Abstract
Methods—This was a descriptive survey using two anonymous questionnaires to gauge current opinion, one designed for medical staff and the other for ambulance staff. Questionnaires were distributed to medical staff in two teaching hospital accident and emergency (A&E) departments and ambulance personnel in the Tayside region of Scotland.
Results—30 medical and 67 ambulance staff completed questionnaires. Some 19.4% of ambulance staff received formal training in giving a handover, 83% of the remaining felt there was a need for training. Medical staff conveyed their belief that handovers were very variable between crews and that they did not feel radio reports were well structured. Ambulance crews felt that medical staff did not pay attention to their handovers. Ambulance staff seemed satisfied with the quality of their handovers, although medical staff were less positive particularly in the context of self poisoning and chest pain. Both seem to be least confident with regards to the handover of paediatric emergencies. Medical staff were generally less satisfied with the reporting of vital signs than the history provided.
Conclusions—Despite a generally positive perception of handovers there may be some room for improvement, in particular in the area of medical emergencies. Ambulance staff training should produce a structure for the handover that is recognisable to medical staff. The aim being a smooth and efficient transfer from prehospital agencies to A&E staff.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (105.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Gerndt S. J., Conley J. L., Lowell M. J., Holmes J., Marsh E., Larin L. R., Taheri P. A., Polley T. Z., Rodriquez J. L. Prehospital classification combined with an in-hospital trauma radio system response reduces cost and duration of evaluation of the injured patient. Surgery. 1995 Oct;118(4):789–796. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6060(05)80051-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morrison W. G., Pennycook A. G., Makower R. M., Swann I. J. The general practitioner's use and expectations of an accident and emergency department. J R Soc Med. 1990 Apr;83(4):237–240. doi: 10.1177/014107689008300412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roughton V. J., Severs M. P. The junior doctor handover: current practices and future expectations. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1996 May-Jun;30(3):213–214. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sherlock C. The patient handover: a study of its form, function and efficiency. Nurs Stand. 1995 Sep 20;9(52):33–36. doi: 10.7748/ns.9.52.33.s34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thurgood G. Verbal handover reports: what skills are needed? 1995 Jun 22-Jul 12Br J Nurs. 4(12):720–722. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1995.4.12.720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamamoto L. G., Wiebe R. A., Maiava D. M., Merry C. J. A one-year series of pediatric prehospital care: I. Ambulance runs; II. Prehospital communication; III. Interhospital transport services. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1991 Aug;7(4):206–214. doi: 10.1097/00006565-199108000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]