Abstract
Methods—A questionnaire survey and notes review of 267 adults presenting to the A&E department of a large teaching hospital in Sheffield, England, triaged to the two lowest priority treatment streams, was conducted over seven weeks. Using defined criteria, patients were classified by the suitability of the presenting health problem to be managed by alternative immediate care services or only by A&E, and also by the likelihood, in similar circumstances, of patients presenting to other services given their reasons for seeking A&E care.
Results—Full data were obtained for 96% of participants (255 of 267). Using objective criteria, it is estimated that 55% (95% CI 50%, 62%) of the health problems presented by a non-urgent population attending A&E are suitable for treatment in either general practice, or a minor injury unit, or a walk in centre or by self care after advice from NHS Direct. However, in almost one quarter (24%) of low priority patients who self referred, A&E was not the first contact with the health services for the presenting health problem. The reason for attending A&E cited most frequently by the patients was a belief that radiography was necessary. The reason given least often was seeking advice from a nurse practitioner. Taking into account the objective suitability of the health problem to be treated elsewhere, and the reasons for attending A&E given by the patients, it is estimated that, with similar health problems, as few as 7% (95% CI 3%, 10%) of the non-urgent A&E population may be expected to present to providers other than A&E in the future.
Conclusions—The increasing availability of alternative services offering first contact care for non-urgent health problems, is likely to have little impact on the demand for A&E services.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (143.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Dale J., Green J., Reid F., Glucksman E., Higgs R. Primary care in the accident and emergency department: II. Comparison of general practitioners and hospital doctors. BMJ. 1995 Aug 12;311(7002):427–430. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7002.427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dale J., Lang H., Roberts J. A., Green J., Glucksman E. Cost effectiveness of treating primary care patients in accident and emergency: a comparison between general practitioners, senior house officers, and registrars. BMJ. 1996 May 25;312(7042):1340–1344. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7042.1340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davison A. G., Hildrey A. C., Floyer M. A. Use and misuse of an accident and emergency department in the East End of London. J R Soc Med. 1983 Jan;76(1):37–40. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Green J., Dale J. Primary care in accident and emergency and general practice: a comparison. Soc Sci Med. 1992 Oct;35(8):987–995. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90238-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lattimer V., George S., Thompson F., Thomas E., Mullee M., Turnbull J., Smith H., Moore M., Bond H., Glasper A. Safety and effectiveness of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: randomised controlled trial. The South Wiltshire Out of Hours Project (SWOOP) Group. BMJ. 1998 Oct 17;317(7165):1054–1059. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7165.1054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lowy A., Kohler B., Nicholl J. Attendance at accident and emergency departments: unnecessary or inappropriate? J Public Health Med. 1994 Jun;16(2):134–140. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Munro J., Nicholl J., O'Cathain A., Knowles E. Impact of NHS direct on demand for immediate care: observational study. BMJ. 2000 Jul 15;321(7254):150–153. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7254.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murphy A. W., Bury G., Plunkett P. K., Gibney D., Smith M., Mullan E., Johnson Z. Randomised controlled trial of general practitioner versus usual medical care in an urban accident and emergency department: process, outcome, and comparative cost. BMJ. 1996 May 4;312(7039):1135–1142. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7039.1135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murphy A. W., Leonard C., Plunkett P. K., Bury G., Lynam F., Smith M., Gibney D. Effect of the introduction of a financial incentive for fee-paying A&E attenders to consult their general practitioner before attending the A&E department. Fam Pract. 1997 Oct;14(5):407–410. doi: 10.1093/fampra/14.5.407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robertson-Steel I. R. Providing primary care in the accident and emergency department. BMJ. 1998 Feb 7;316(7129):409–410. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7129.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sakr M., Angus J., Perrin J., Nixon C., Nicholl J., Wardrope J. Care of minor injuries by emergency nurse practitioners or junior doctors: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1999 Oct 16;354(9187):1321–1326. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)02447-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ward P., Huddy J., Hargreaves S., Touquet R., Hurley J., Fothergill J. Primary care in London: an evaluation of general practitioners working in an inner city accident and emergency department. J Accid Emerg Med. 1996 Jan;13(1):11–15. doi: 10.1136/emj.13.1.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Young G. P., Wagner M. B., Kellermann A. L., Ellis J., Bouley D. Ambulatory visits to hospital emergency departments. Patterns and reasons for use. 24 Hours in the ED Study Group. JAMA. 1996 Aug 14;276(6):460–465. doi: 10.1001/jama.276.6.460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]