Skip to main content
Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ logoLink to Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ
. 2002 Mar;19(2):155–159. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.2.155

Delphi type methodology to develop consensus on the future design of EMS systems in the United Kingdom

T Hassan 1, D Barnett 1
PMCID: PMC1725813  PMID: 11904271

Abstract

Design: A Delphi questionnaire design with two rounds to gain a consensus of opinion. Investigation of four aspects of EMS design is reported—type of response to a priority based dispatch category, transportation options, enhancement of paramedic skills, and structure of a first responder system.

Subjects: Chief executives, directors of operations, and medical directors of Ambulance Trusts in the United Kingdom.

Outcome measures: Likert scales (0–9) to score opinion on a series of statements with achievement of inter-round consistency. A median score of 0–4 was classified as disagreement and 6–9 as agreement.

Results: A 65% response to the first questionnaire and with iteration, 52% response to the second questionnaire was attained. A tiered response (paramedics, technicians, and basic life support first responders) with technicians responding to selected category A and B calls and all category C calls (median score (MS) 7.5, interquartile range (IQR) 4), was recommended. Inter-unit handover of selected calls to maintain paramedic availablity ( MS 7.5, IQR 3.75) and enhancement of paramedic skills (MS 7.0, IQR 4.0) was also proposed. Finally, the development of a first responder system fully integrated into the EMS (MS 8.0, IQR 2.75) involving other agencies including the police force, fire service, and trained members of the local community was agreed.

Conclusions: Senior expert staff from Ambulance Trusts in the UK achieved consensus on certain design characteristics of EMS systems. These are significantly different from the present EMS model.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (85.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Braun O., McCallion R., Fazackerley J. Characteristics of midsized urban EMS systems. Ann Emerg Med. 1990 May;19(5):536–546. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82186-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cady G., Scott T. 1995 almanac. EMS in the United States. 1995 survey of providers in the 200 most populous cities. JEMS. 1995 Jan;20(1):76–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cocks R. A., Glucksman E. What does London need from its ambulance service? BMJ. 1993 May 29;306(6890):1428–1429. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6890.1428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Delbridge T. R., Bailey B., Chew J. L., Jr, Conn A. K., Krakeel J. J., Manz D., Miller D. R., O'Malley P. J., Ryan S. D., Spaite D. W. EMS agenda for the future: where we are ... where we want to be. EMS Agenda for the Future Steering Committee. Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Feb;31(2):251–263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eisenberg M. S., Horwood B. T., Cummins R. O., Reynolds-Haertle R., Hearne T. R. Cardiac arrest and resuscitation: a tale of 29 cities. Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Feb;19(2):179–186. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81805-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Guly U. M., Mitchell R. G., Cook R., Steedman D. J., Robertson C. E. Paramedics and technicians are equally successful at managing cardiac arrest outside hospital. BMJ. 1995 Apr 29;310(6987):1091–1094. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6987.1091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jones J., Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ. 1995 Aug 5;311(7001):376–380. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7001.376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kessner D. M., Kalk C. E., Singer J. Assessing health quality--the case for tracers. N Engl J Med. 1973 Jan 25;288(4):189–194. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197301252880406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kuehl A. E., Kerr J. T., Thompson J. M. Urban emergency medical systems: a consensus. Am J Emerg Med. 1984 Nov;2(6):559–563. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(84)90084-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Maio R. F., Garrison H. G., Spaite D. W., Desmond J. S., Gregor M. A., Cayten C. G., Chew J. L., Jr, Hill E. M., Joyce S. M., MacKenzie E. J. Emergency medical services outcomes project I (EMSOP I): prioritizing conditions for outcomes research. Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Apr;33(4):423–432. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70307-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mann C. J., Guly H. Paramedic interventions increase the rate of return of spontaneous circulation in out of hospital cardiac arrests. J Accid Emerg Med. 1997 May;14(3):149–150. doi: 10.1136/emj.14.3.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mosesso V. N., Jr, Davis E. A., Auble T. E., Paris P. M., Yealy D. M. Use of automated external defibrillators by police officers for treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Aug;32(2):200–207. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70137-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nichol G., Detsky A. S., Stiell I. G., O'Rourke K., Wells G., Laupacis A. Effectiveness of emergency medical services for victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a metaanalysis. Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Jun;27(6):700–710. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70187-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Reines H. D., Bartlett R. L., Chudy N. E., Kiragu K. R., McKnew M. A. Is advanced life support appropriate for victims of motor vehicle accidents: the South Carolina Highway Trauma Project. J Trauma. 1988 May;28(5):563–570. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198805000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Walters G., Glucksman E. Retention of skills by advanced trained ambulance staff: implications for monitoring and retraining. BMJ. 1989 Mar 11;298(6674):649–650. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6674.649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES