Skip to main content
PMC home page
Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ logoLink to Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ
. 2003 Jan;20(1):3–5. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.1.3

Rapid sequence intubation in Scottish urban emergency departments

C Graham 1, D Beard 1, A Oglesby 1, S Thakore 1, J Beale 1, J Brittliff 1, M Johnston 1, D McKeown 1, T Parke 1
PMCID: PMC1726022  PMID: 12533357

Abstract

Objective: Airway care is the cornerstone of resuscitation. In UK emergency department practice, this care is provided by anaesthetists and emergency physicians. The aim of this study was to determine current practice for rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in a sample of emergency departments in Scotland.

Methods: Two year, multicentre, prospective observational study of endotracheal intubation in the emergency departments of seven Scottish urban teaching hospitals.

Results: 1631 patients underwent an intubation attempt in the emergency department and 735 patients satisfied the criteria for RSI. Emergency physicians intubated 377 patients and anaesthetists intubated 355 patients. There was no difference in median age between the groups but there was a significantly greater proportion of men (73.2% versus 65.3%, p=0.024) and trauma patients (48.5% versus 37.4%, p=0.003) in the anaesthetic group. Anaesthetists had a higher initial success rate (91.8% versus 83.8%, p=0.001) and achieved more good (Cormack-Lehane Grade I and II) views at laryngoscopy (94.0% versus 89.3%, p=0.039). There was a non-significant trend to more complications in the group of patients intubated by emergency physicians (8.7% versus 12.7%, p=0.104). Emergency physicians intubated a higher proportion of patients with physiological compromise (91.8% versus 86.1%, p=0.027) and a higher proportion of patients within 15 minutes of arrival (32.6% versus 11.3%, p<0.0001).

Conclusion: Anaesthetists achieve more good views at laryngoscopy with higher initial success rates during RSI. Emergency physicians perform RSI on a higher proportion of critically ill patients and a higher proportion of patients within 15 minutes of arrival. Complications may be fewer in the anaesthetists' group, but this could be related to differences in patient populations. Training issues for RSI and emergency airway care are discussed. Complication rates for both groups are in keeping with previous studies.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (75.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barr A. M., Thornley B. A. Thiopentone and suxamethonium crash induction. An assessment of the potential hazards. Anaesthesia. 1976 Jan-Feb;31(1):23–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1976.tb11741.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beard D., Henry J. M., Grant P. T. National audit of the management of injured patients in 20 Scottish hospitals. Health Bull (Edinb) 2000 Mar;58(2):118–126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cormack R. S., Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 1984 Nov;39(11):1105–1111. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dufour D. G., Larose D. L., Clement S. C. Rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 1995 Sep-Oct;13(5):705–710. doi: 10.1016/0736-4679(95)00089-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Li J., Murphy-Lavoie H., Bugas C., Martinez J., Preston C. Complications of emergency intubation with and without paralysis. Am J Emerg Med. 1999 Mar;17(2):141–143. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(99)90046-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ligier B., Buchman T. G., Breslow M. J., Deutschman C. S. The role of anesthetic induction agents and neuromuscular blockade in the endotracheal intubation of trauma victims. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991 Dec;173(6):477–481. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mackay C. A., Terris J., Coats T. J. Prehospital rapid sequence induction by emergency physicians: is it safe? Emerg Med J. 2001 Jan;18(1):20–24. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.1.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McBrien M. E., Pollok A. J., Steedman D. J. Advanced airway control in trauma resuscitation. Arch Emerg Med. 1992 Jun;9(2):177–180. doi: 10.1136/emj.9.2.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sakles J. C., Laurin E. G., Rantapaa A. A., Panacek E. A. Airway management in the emergency department: a one-year study of 610 tracheal intubations. Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Mar;31(3):325–332. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70342-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schwartz D. E., Matthay M. A., Cohen N. H. Death and other complications of emergency airway management in critically ill adults. A prospective investigation of 297 tracheal intubations. Anesthesiology. 1995 Feb;82(2):367–376. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199502000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tayal V. S., Riggs R. W., Marx J. A., Tomaszewski C. A., Schneider R. E. Rapid-sequence intubation at an emergency medicine residency: success rate and adverse events during a two-year period. Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Jan;6(1):31–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00091.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Walker A., Brenchley J. Survey of the use of rapid sequence induction in the accident and emergency department. J Accid Emerg Med. 2000 Mar;17(2):95–97. doi: 10.1136/emj.17.2.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Walls R. M. Rapid-sequence intubation comes of age. Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Jul;28(1):79–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES