Skip to main content
PMC home page
Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ logoLink to Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ
. 2003 Mar;20(2):178–183. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.2.178

Computer assisted assessment and advice for "non-serious" 999 ambulance service callers: the potential impact on ambulance despatch

J Dale 1, J Higgins 1, S Williams 1, T Foster 1, H Snooks 1, R Crouch 1, C Hartley-Sharpe 1, E Glucksman 1, R Hooper 1, S George 1
PMCID: PMC1726071  PMID: 12642540

Abstract

Design: Pragmatic controlled trial. Calls identified using priority dispatch protocols as non-serious were allocated to intervention and control groups according to time of call. Ambulance dispatch occurred according to existing procedures. During intervention sessions, nurses or paramedics within the control room used a computerised decision support system to provide telephone assessment, triage and, if appropriate, offer advice to permit estimation of the potential impact on ambulance dispatch.

Setting: Ambulance services in London and the West Midlands.

Subjects: Patients for whom emergency calls were made to the ambulance services between April 1998 and May 1999 during four hour sessions sampled across all days of the week between 0700 and 2300.

Main outcome measures: Triage decision, ambulance cancellation, attendance at an emergency department.

Results: In total, there were 635 intervention calls and 611 controls. Of those in the intervention group, 330 (52.0%) were triaged as not requiring an emergency ambulance, and 119 (36.6%) of these did not attend an emergency department. This compares with 55 (18.1%) of those triaged by a nurse or paramedic as requiring an ambulance (odds ratio 2.62; 95% CI 1.78 to 3.85). Patients triaged as not requiring an emergency ambulance were less likely to be admitted to an inpatient bed (odds ratio 0.55; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.93), but even so 30 (9.2%) were admitted. Nurses were more likely than paramedics to triage calls into the groups classified as not requiring an ambulance. After controlling for age, case mix, time of day, day of week, season, and ambulance service, the results of a logistic regression analysis revealed that this difference was significant with an odds ratio for nurses:paramedics of 1.28 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.47).

Conclusions: The findings indicate that telephone assessment of Category C calls identifies patients who are less likely to require emergency department care and that this could have a significant impact on emergency ambulance dispatch rates. Nurses were more likely than paramedics to assess calls as requiring an alternative response to emergency ambulance despatch, but the extent to which this relates to aspects of training and professional perspective is unclear. However, consideration should be given to the acceptability, reliability, and cost consequences of this intervention before it can be recommended for full evaluation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (98.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Billittier A. J., Moscati R., Janicke D., Lerner E. B., Seymour J., Olsson D. A multisite survey of factors contributing to medically unnecessary ambulance transports. Acad Emerg Med. 1996 Nov;3(11):1046–1052. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03352.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown E., Sindelar J. The emergent problem of ambulance misuse. Ann Emerg Med. 1993 Apr;22(4):646–650. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81841-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen J. C., Bullard M. J., Liaw S. J. Ambulance use, misuse, and unmet needs in a developing emergency medical services system. Eur J Emerg Med. 1996 Jun;3(2):73–78. doi: 10.1097/00063110-199606000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gardner G. J. The use and abuse of the emergency ambulance service: some of the factors affecting the decision whether to call an emergency ambulance. Arch Emerg Med. 1990 Jun;7(2):81–89. doi: 10.1136/emj.7.2.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gibson G. Measures of emergency ambulance effectiveness: unmet need and inappropriate use. JACEP. 1977 Sep;6(9):389–392. doi: 10.1016/s0361-1124(77)80002-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Holm O., Berlac P. A., Jensen P. K., Sillesen I. B., Fog T., Lausten G. S. Relevansen af alarm 112-opkald blandt skadestueklientel i amtssygehuset i herlevs optagelsesområde. Ugeskr Laeger. 1997 Mar 17;159(12):1749–1751. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kongelf E., Lereim I., Hald K. Rekvirering av ambulanse til akutt syke og skadede. Misbrukes akuttambulansetjenesten? Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1989 Nov 30;109(33):3447–3451. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lattimer V., George S., Thompson F., Thomas E., Mullee M., Turnbull J., Smith H., Moore M., Bond H., Glasper A. Safety and effectiveness of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: randomised controlled trial. The South Wiltshire Out of Hours Project (SWOOP) Group. BMJ. 1998 Oct 17;317(7165):1054–1059. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7165.1054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Little G. F., Barton D. Inappropriate use of the ambulance service. Eur J Emerg Med. 1998 Sep;5(3):307–311. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Morris D. L., Cross A. B. Is the emergency ambulance service abused? Br Med J. 1980 Jul 12;281(6233):121–123. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6233.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. O'Leary C., Bury G., McCabe M., Kelly C., McGoldrick F., Ward F. Ambulance-user analysis in an accident and emergency department. Ir Med J. 1987 Dec;80(12):422–423. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Palazzo F. F., Warner O. J., Harron M., Sadana A. Misuse of the London ambulance service: How much and why? J Accid Emerg Med. 1998 Nov;15(6):368–370. doi: 10.1136/emj.15.6.368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pennycook A. G., Makower R. M., Morrison W. G. Use of the emergency ambulance service to an inner city accident and emergency department--a comparison of general practitioner and '999' calls. J R Soc Med. 1991 Dec;84(12):726–727. doi: 10.1177/014107689108401211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rademaker A. W., Powell D. G., Read J. H. Inappropriate use and unmet need in paramedic and nonparamedic ambulance systems. Ann Emerg Med. 1987 May;16(5):553–556. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(87)80684-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Richards J. R., Ferrall S. J. Inappropriate use of emergency medical services transport: comparison of provider and patient perspectives. Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Jan;6(1):14–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00088.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES