Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to develop and evaluate an evidence based educational booklet on whiplash associated disorders.
Methods: A comprehensive review of the available scientific evidence produced a set of unambiguous patient centred messages that challenge unhelpful beliefs about whiplash and promote an active approach to recovery. These messages were incorporated into a novel booklet, which was then evaluated qualitatively for end user acceptability and its ability to impart the intended messages, and quantitatively for its ability to improve beliefs about whiplash and what to do about it. The subjects comprised people attending accident and emergency or manipulative practice with a whiplash associated disorder, along with a sample of workers without a whiplash associated disorder (n = 142).
Results: The qualitative results showed that the booklet was considered easy to read, understandable, believable, and conveyed its key messages. Quantitatively, it produced a substantial statistically significant improvement in beliefs about whiplash among accident and emergency patients (mean 6.5, 95% CI 3.9 to 9.1, p<0.001), and among workers (mean 9.4, 95% CI 7.9 to 10.9, p<0.001), but the shift in the more chronic manipulation patients was substantially smaller (mean 3.3, 95% CI 0.5 to 6.1, p<0.05).
Conclusions: A rigorously developed educational booklet on whiplash (The Whiplash Book) was found acceptable to patients, and capable of improving beliefs about whiplash and its management; it seems suitable for use in the accident and emergency environment, and for wider distribution at the population level. A randomised controlled trial would be required to determine whether it exerts an effect on behaviour and clinical outcomes.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (123.7 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Burton A. K., Waddell G., Burtt R., Blair S. Patient educational material in the management of low back pain in primary care. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1996;55(3):138–141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burton A. K., Waddell G., Tillotson K. M., Summerton N. Information and advice to patients with back pain can have a positive effect. A randomized controlled trial of a novel educational booklet in primary care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999 Dec 1;24(23):2484–2491. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199912010-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coulter A. Evidence based patient information. is important, so there needs to be a national strategy to ensure it. BMJ. 1998 Jul 25;317(7153):225–226. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7153.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Côté P., Cassidy J. D., Carroll L., Frank J. W., Bombardier C. A systematic review of the prognosis of acute whiplash and a new conceptual framework to synthesize the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001 Oct 1;26(19):E445–E458. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200110010-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Côté P., Hogg-Johnson S., Cassidy J. D., Carroll L., Frank J. W. The association between neck pain intensity, physical functioning, depressive symptomatology and time-to-claim-closure after whiplash. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Mar;54(3):275–286. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00319-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gargan M. F., Bannister G. C. The rate of recovery following whiplash injury. Eur Spine J. 1994;3(3):162–164. doi: 10.1007/BF02190579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gargan M., Bannister G., Main C., Hollis S. The behavioural response to whiplash injury. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Jul;79(4):523–526. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.79b4.6940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grimshaw J. M., Russell I. T. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993 Nov 27;342(8883):1317–1322. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maimaris C., Barnes M. R., Allen M. J. 'Whiplash injuries' of the neck: a retrospective study. Injury. 1988 Nov;19(6):393–396. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(88)90131-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mayou R., Bryant B. Outcome of 'whiplash' neck injury. Injury. 1996 Nov;27(9):617–623. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(96)00114-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McClune T., Burton A. K., Waddell G. Whiplash associated disorders: a review of the literature to guide patient information and advice. Emerg Med J. 2002 Nov;19(6):499–506. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.6.499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Obelieniene D., Schrader H., Bovim G., Miseviciene I., Sand T. Pain after whiplash: a prospective controlled inception cohort study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999 Mar;66(3):279–283. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.66.3.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spitzer W. O., Skovron M. L., Salmi L. R., Cassidy J. D., Duranceau J., Suissa S., Zeiss E. Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining "whiplash" and its management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995 Apr 15;20(8 Suppl):1S–73S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suissa S., Harder S., Veilleux M. The relation between initial symptoms and signs and the prognosis of whiplash. Eur Spine J. 2001 Feb;10(1):44–49. doi: 10.1007/s005860000220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Symonds T. L., Burton A. K., Tillotson K. M., Main C. J. Do attitudes and beliefs influence work loss due to low back trouble? Occup Med (Lond) 1996 Feb;46(1):25–32. doi: 10.1093/occmed/46.1.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Virani S. N., Ferrari R., Russell A. S. Physician resistance to the late whiplash syndrome. J Rheumatol. 2001 Sep;28(9):2096–2099. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]