Skip to main content
PMC home page
Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ logoLink to Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ
. 2004 Mar;21(2):155–161. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.005413

Randomised controlled comparison of continuous positive airways pressure, bilevel non-invasive ventilation, and standard treatment in emergency department patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema

S Crane 1, M Elliott 1, P Gilligan 1, K Richards 1, A Gray 1
PMCID: PMC1726258  PMID: 14988338

Abstract

Background: Continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP) and bilevel non-invasive ventilation may have beneficial effects in the treatment of patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. The efficacy of both treatments was assessed in the UK emergency department setting, in a randomised comparison with standard oxygen therapy.

Methods: Sixty patients presenting with acidotic (pH<7.35) acute, cardiogenic pulmonary oedema, were randomly assigned conventional oxygen therapy, CPAP (10 cm H2O), or bilevel ventilation (IPAP 15 cm H2O, EPAP 5 cm H2O) provided by a standard ventilator through a face mask. The main end points were treatment success at two hours and in-hospital mortality. Analyses were by intention to treat.

Results: Treatment success (defined as all of respiratory rate<23 bpm, oxygen saturation of>90%, and arterial blood pH>7.35 (that is, reversal of acidosis), at the end of the two hour study period) occurred in three (15%) patients in the control group, seven (35%) in the CPAP group, and nine (45%) in the bilevel group (p = 0.116). Fourteen (70%) of the control group patients survived to hospital discharge, compared with 20 (100%) in the CPAP group and 15 (75%) in the bilevel group (p = 0.029; Fisher's test).

Conclusions: In this study, patients presenting with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema and acidosis, were more likely to survive to hospital discharge if treated with CPAP, rather than with bilevel ventilation or with conventional oxygen therapy. There was no relation between in hospital survival and early physiological changes. Survival rates were similar to other studies despite a low rate of endotracheal intubation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (267.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baratz D. M., Westbrook P. R., Shah P. K., Mohsenifar Z. Effect of nasal continuous positive airway pressure on cardiac output and oxygen delivery in patients with congestive heart failure. Chest. 1992 Nov;102(5):1397–1401. doi: 10.1378/chest.102.5.1397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bersten A. D., Holt A. W., Vedig A. E., Skowronski G. A., Baggoley C. J. Treatment of severe cardiogenic pulmonary edema with continuous positive airway pressure delivered by face mask. N Engl J Med. 1991 Dec 26;325(26):1825–1830. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199112263252601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cotter G., Metzkor E., Kaluski E., Faigenberg Z., Miller R., Simovitz A., Shaham O., Marghitay D., Koren M., Blatt A. Randomised trial of high-dose isosorbide dinitrate plus low-dose furosemide versus high-dose furosemide plus low-dose isosorbide dinitrate in severe pulmonary oedema. Lancet. 1998 Feb 7;351(9100):389–393. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08417-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Crane Steven D. Epidemiology, treatment and outcome of acidotic, acute, cardiogenic pulmonary oedema presenting to an emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med. 2002 Dec;9(4):320–324. doi: 10.1097/00063110-200212000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cross A. M. Review of the role of non-invasive ventilation in the emergency department. J Accid Emerg Med. 2000 Mar;17(2):79–85. doi: 10.1136/emj.17.2.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Delclaux C., L'Her E., Alberti C., Mancebo J., Abroug F., Conti G., Guérin C., Schortgen F., Lefort Y., Antonelli M. Treatment of acute hypoxemic nonhypercapnic respiratory insufficiency with continuous positive airway pressure delivered by a face mask: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000 Nov 8;284(18):2352–2360. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.18.2352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hotchkiss J. R., Marini J. J. Noninvasive ventilation: an emerging supportive technique for the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Oct;32(4):470–479. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70177-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Katz J. A., Marks J. D. Inspiratory work with and without continuous positive airway pressure in patients with acute respiratory failure. Anesthesiology. 1985 Dec;63(6):598–607. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198512000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kelly C. A., Newby D. E., McDonagh T. A., Mackay T. W., Barr J., Boon N. A., Dargie H. J., Douglas N. J. Randomised controlled trial of continuous positive airway pressure and standard oxygen therapy in acute pulmonary oedema; effects on plasma brain natriuretic peptide concentrations. Eur Heart J. 2002 Sep;23(17):1379–1386. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2001.3156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kelly C., Newby D. E., Boon N. A., Douglas N. J. Support ventilation versus conventional oxygen. Lancet. 2001 Apr 7;357(9262):1126–1126. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04272-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lenique F., Habis M., Lofaso F., Dubois-Randé J. L., Harf A., Brochard L. Ventilatory and hemodynamic effects of continuous positive airway pressure in left heart failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Feb;155(2):500–505. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.155.2.9032185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Levitt M. A. A prospective, randomized trial of BiPAP in severe acute congestive heart failure. J Emerg Med. 2001 Nov;21(4):363–369. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(01)00385-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lin M., Chiang H. T. The efficacy of early continuous positive airway pressure therapy in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. J Formos Med Assoc. 1991 Aug;90(8):736–743. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lin M., Yang Y. F., Chiang H. T., Chang M. S., Chiang B. N., Cheitlin M. D. Reappraisal of continuous positive airway pressure therapy in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Short-term results and long-term follow-up. Chest. 1995 May;107(5):1379–1386. doi: 10.1378/chest.107.5.1379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Masip J., Betbesé A. J., Páez J., Vecilla F., Cañizares R., Padró J., Paz M. A., de Otero J., Ballús J. Non-invasive pressure support ventilation versus conventional oxygen therapy in acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2000 Dec 23;356(9248):2126–2132. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03492-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mehta S., Jay G. D., Woolard R. H., Hipona R. A., Connolly E. M., Cimini D. M., Drinkwine J. H., Hill N. S. Randomized, prospective trial of bilevel versus continuous positive airway pressure in acute pulmonary edema. Crit Care Med. 1997 Apr;25(4):620–628. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199704000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Naughton M. T., Rahman M. A., Hara K., Floras J. S., Bradley T. D. Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on intrathoracic and left ventricular transmural pressures in patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation. 1995 Mar 15;91(6):1725–1731. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.6.1725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pang D., Keenan S. P., Cook D. J., Sibbald W. J. The effect of positive pressure airway support on mortality and the need for intubation in cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a systematic review. Chest. 1998 Oct;114(4):1185–1192. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.4.1185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Park M., Lorenzi-Filho G., Feltrim M. I., Viecili P. R., Sangean M. C., Volpe M., Leite P. F., Mansur A. J. Oxygen therapy, continuous positive airway pressure, or noninvasive bilevel positive pressure ventilation in the treatment of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2001 Mar;76(3):221–230. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2001000300005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Räsänen J., Heikkilä J., Downs J., Nikki P., Väisänen I., Viitanen A. Continuous positive airway pressure by face mask in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Am J Cardiol. 1985 Feb 1;55(4):296–300. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90364-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sharon A., Shpirer I., Kaluski E., Moshkovitz Y., Milovanov O., Polak R., Blatt A., Simovitz A., Shaham O., Faigenberg Z. High-dose intravenous isosorbide-dinitrate is safer and better than Bi-PAP ventilation combined with conventional treatment for severe pulmonary edema. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Sep;36(3):832–837. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00785-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Takeda S., Nejima J., Takano T., Nakanishi K., Takayama M., Sakamoto A., Ogawa R. Effect of nasal continuous positive airway pressure on pulmonary edema complicating acute myocardial infarction. Jpn Circ J. 1998 Aug;62(8):553–558. doi: 10.1253/jcj.62.553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Väisänen I. T., Räsänen J. Continuous positive airway pressure and supplemental oxygen in the treatment of cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Chest. 1987 Sep;92(3):481–485. doi: 10.1378/chest.92.3.481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wood K. A., Lewis L., Von Harz B., Kollef M. H. The use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the emergency department: results of a randomized clinical trial. Chest. 1998 May;113(5):1339–1346. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.5.1339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES