Skip to main content
PMC home page
Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ logoLink to Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ
. 2004 May;21(3):323–326. doi: 10.1136/emj.2002.000356

Prospective, randomised, double blind, controlled comparison of metoclopramide and pethidine in the emergency treatment of acute primary vascular and tension type headache episodes

M Cicek 1, O Karcioglu 1, I Parlak 1, V Ozturk 1, O Duman 1, M Serinken 1, M Guryay 1
PMCID: PMC1726328  PMID: 15107371

Abstract

Study objective: To compare analgesic effects of metoclopramide (MTP), pethidine (PET), and combination of metoclopramide-pethidine (M-PET) in the treatment of adult patients with acute primary vascular and tension type headache admitted in the emergency department (ED).

Methods: All consecutive adult patients admitted into a university hospital ED in six months with acute vascular and tension type headache were recruited. The patients whose complaints had lasted no longer than seven days were randomised to four groups and thereby received 10 mg MTP intravenously plus placebo intramuscularly (MTP), 10 mg MTP intravenously plus 50 mg PET intramuscularly (M-PET), 50 mg PET intramuscularly plus placebo intravenously (PET); and intramuscular and intravenous placebo (PLC) in a blinded fashion. The patients were asked to report the degree of pain at 0, 15, 30, and 45 minutes on visual analogue scale (VAS) and demographic data and any side effects encountered were recorded. Rescue medication was used if required by the patient because of poor pain relief.

Results: Data regarding 336 patients meeting inclusion criteria were analysed. Mean VAS values recorded at 45 minutes were significantly higher in PLC group than in others (p = 0.000). When the PLC group was excluded, VAS scores in MTP and M-PET groups were significantly lower than in PET group (p = 0.038). Though unimportant, the incidence of side effects recorded in PET group was found to be significantly higher than in the other groups (p = 0.003).

Conclusion: These data suggest that MTP produces more effective analgesia than PET in both vascular and tension type headache in patients with acute primary headache episodes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (178.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Belgrade M. J., Ling L. J., Schleevogt M. B., Ettinger M. G., Ruiz E. Comparison of single-dose meperidine, butorphanol, and dihydroergotamine in the treatment of vascular headache. Neurology. 1989 Apr;39(4):590–592. doi: 10.1212/wnl.39.4.590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cameron J. D., Lane P. L., Speechley M. Intravenous chlorpromazine vs intravenous metoclopramide in acute migraine headache. Acad Emerg Med. 1995 Jul;2(7):597–602. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1995.tb03596.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carleton S. C., Shesser R. F., Pietrzak M. P., Chudnofsky C. R., Starkman S., Morris D. L., Johnson G., Rhee K. J., Barton C. W., Chelly J. E. Double-blind, multicenter trial to compare the efficacy of intramuscular dihydroergotamine plus hydroxyzine versus intramuscular meperidine plus hydroxyzine for the emergency department treatment of acute migraine headache. Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Aug;32(2):129–138. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70126-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chabriat H., Joire J. E., Danchot J., Grippon P., Bousser M. G. Combined oral lysine acetylsalicylate and metoclopramide in the acute treatment of migraine: a multicentre double-blind placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 1994 Aug;14(4):297–300. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1994.1404297.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coppola M., Yealy D. M., Leibold R. A. Randomized, placebo-controlled evaluation of prochlorperazine versus metoclopramide for emergency department treatment of migraine headache. Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Nov;26(5):541–546. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70001-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis C. P., Torre P. R., Williams C., Gray C., Barrett K., Krucke G., Peake D., Bass B., Jr Ketorolac versus meperidine-plus-promethazine treatment of migraine headache: evaluations by patients. Am J Emerg Med. 1995 Mar;13(2):146–150. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(95)90081-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ellis G. L., Delaney J., DeHart D. A., Owens A. The efficacy of metoclopramide in the treatment of migraine headache. Ann Emerg Med. 1993 Feb;22(2):191–195. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)80201-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gross D. W., Donat J. R., Boyle C. A. Dihydroergotamine and metoclopramide in the treatment of organic headache. Headache. 1995 Nov-Dec;35(10):637–638. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1995.hed3510637.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Harden R. N., Gracely R. H., Carter T., Warner G. The placebo effect in acute headache management: ketorolac, meperidine, and saline in the emergency department. Headache. 1996 Jun;36(6):352–356. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1996.3606352.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Harden R. N., Rogers D., Fink K., Gracely R. H. Controlled trial of ketorolac in tension-type headache. Neurology. 1998 Feb;50(2):507–509. doi: 10.1212/wnl.50.2.507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Henry P., Hiesse-Provost O., Dillenschneider A., Ganry H., Insuasty J. Efficacité et tolérance de l'association effervescente aspirine-métoclopramide dans le traitement de la crise de migraine sans aura. Essai randomisé en double aveugle contre placebo. Presse Med. 1995 Feb 4;24(5):254–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hugues F. C., Lacoste J. P., Danchot J., Joire J. E. Repeated doses of combined oral lysine acetylsalicylate and metoclopramide in the acute treatment of migraine. Headache. 1997 Jul-Aug;37(7):452–454. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1997.3707452.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jones J., Pack S., Chun E. Intramuscular prochlorperazine versus metoclopramide as single-agent therapy for the treatment of acute migraine headache. Am J Emerg Med. 1996 May;14(3):262–264. doi: 10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90171-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Klapper J. A., Stanton J. Current emergency treatment of severe migraine headaches. Headache. 1993 Nov-Dec;33(10):560–562. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1993.hed3310560.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lane P. L., McLellan B. A., Baggoley C. J. Comparative efficacy of chlorpromazine and meperidine with dimenhydrinate in migraine headache. Ann Emerg Med. 1989 Apr;18(4):360–365. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80570-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MacCumber M. W., Jaffe G. J., McCuen B. W., 2nd Treatment of migraine headache after ocular surgery with intravenous metoclopramide hydrochloride. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 Jan;121(1):96–97. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70542-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pradalier A., Guérard des Lauriers A., Scheck F., Peraudeau P., Lacoste J. P., Cajfinger F. Association carbasalate calcique-métoclopramide versus di-hydroergotamine dans le traitement de la crise de migraine. Pathol Biol (Paris) 1995 Nov;43(9):806–813. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Scherl E. R., Wilson J. F. Comparison of dihydroergotamine with metoclopramide versus meperidine with promethazine in the treatment of acute migraine. Headache. 1995 May;35(5):256–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1995.hed3505256.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Spence J. Migraine and other causes of headache. Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Apr;27(4):448–450. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70228-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Stiell I. G., Dufour D. G., Moher D., Yen M., Beilby W. J., Smith N. A. Methotrimeprazine versus meperidine and dimenhydrinate in the treatment of severe migraine: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 1991 Nov;20(11):1201–1205. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81471-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sztajnkrycer M., Jauch E. C. Unusual headaches. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1998 Nov;16(4):741-60, vi. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8627(05)70031-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tek D. S., McClellan D. S., Olshaker J. S., Allen C. L., Arthur D. C. A prospective, double-blind study of metoclopramide hydrochloride for the control of migraine in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Oct;19(10):1083–1087. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81508-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Yealy D. M. Ketorolac in the treatment of acute pain: the pendulum swings. Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Aug;21(8):985–986. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82941-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES