Abstract
Methods: Patients suffering from chest pain or trauma were randomised to receive either a rapid dosing regimen (10 mg over 30 seconds, repeated once after three minutes if pain score remained above three) or a cautious regimen (5 mg over two minutes, repeated at three minute intervals if pain score remained above three to a maximum dose of 20 mg). Data were collected on analgesic effectiveness, changes in vital signs, and patient reported side effects.
Results: The pain score fell by a mean of 4.29 and 3.49 in the rapid and cautious regimen groups respectively (difference = 0.79, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.5, p = 0.028). However, over half the patients in both groups continued to suffer significant pain on arrival at hospital. There were no significant changes in vital signs after nalbuphine, but there was a greater incidence of patient reported drowsiness in rapid regimen patients (42% compared with 21%, 95% CI = 6.96 to 34.12%, p = 0.003).
Conclusion: A rapid dosing regimen of nalbuphine using 10 mg increments is more effective than and equally as safe as a cautious regimen using 5 mg increments. Further research is required to determine if a maximum dose exceeding 20 mg would result in fewer patients continuing to suffer significant pain before arrival at hospital.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (262.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bailey P. L., Clark N. J., Pace N. L., Isern M., Stanley T. H. Failure of nalbuphine to antagonize morphine: a double-blind comparison with naloxone. Anesth Analg. 1986 Jun;65(6):605–611. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bolton J. E., Wilkinson R. C. Responsiveness of pain scales: a comparison of three pain intensity measures in chiropractic patients. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998 Jan;21(1):1–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bondestam E., Hovgren K., Gaston Johansson F., Jern S., Herlitz J., Holmberg S. Pain assessment by patients and nurses in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction. J Adv Nurs. 1987 Nov;12(6):677–682. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1987.tb01369.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chambers J. A., Guly H. R. Prehospital intravenous nalbuphine administered by paramedics. Resuscitation. 1994 Mar;27(2):153–158. doi: 10.1016/0300-9572(94)90008-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ekblom A., Hansson P. Pain intensity measurements in patients with acute pain receiving afferent stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988 Apr;51(4):481–486. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.51.4.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Houlihan K. P., Mitchell R. G., Flapan A. D., Steedman D. J. Excessive morphine requirements after pre-hospital nalbuphine analgesia. J Accid Emerg Med. 1999 Jan;16(1):29–31. doi: 10.1136/emj.16.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jamidar H. A., Crooks S. W., Adgey A. A. Nalbuphine versus diamorphine early in the course of suspected myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1987 Jun;8(6):597–602. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a062328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moher D., Schulz K. F., Altman D. G. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet. 2001 Apr 14;357(9263):1191–1194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nikoda V. V., Lebedeva R. N., Artamoshina M. P., Storozhenko I. N. Sravnitel'naia otsenka primeneniia nalbufina i buprenorfina v usloviiakh okazaniia dogospital'noi pomoshchi. Anesteziol Reanimatol. 1998 Sep-Oct;(5):23–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohnhaus E. E., Adler R. Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain. 1975 Dec;1(4):379–384. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(75)90075-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Price D. D., Bush F. M., Long S., Harkins S. W. A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain. 1994 Feb;56(2):217–226. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90097-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seymour R. A. The use of pain scales in assessing the efficacy of analgesics in post-operative dental pain. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1982;23(5):441–444. doi: 10.1007/BF00605995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stene J. K., Stofberg L., MacDonald G., Myers R. A., Ramzy A., Burns B. Nalbuphine analgesia in the prehospital setting. Am J Emerg Med. 1988 Nov;6(6):634–639. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(88)90109-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Woollard M., Jones T., Pitt K., Vetter N. Hitting them where it hurts? Low dose nalbuphine therapy. Emerg Med J. 2002 Nov;19(6):565–570. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.6.565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]