Skip to main content
Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ logoLink to Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ
. 2004 May;21(3):327–332. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.012351

Headache management—Are we doing enough? An observational study of patients presenting with headache to the emergency department

T Locker 1, S Mason 1, A Rigby 1
PMCID: PMC1726346  PMID: 15107372

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the causes of acute headache presenting to the emergency department (ED), assess the adequacy of history, examination, and investigation, and determine which clinical features are predictive of secondary headache.

Method: A retrospective study of alert (GCS⩾14) patients presenting with headache, to an ED over a one year period. Patients were followed up for three months. The adequacy of history, examination, and investigation were compared with published standards. Analysis using Bayes's theorem determined which clinical features were predictive of secondary headache.

Results: Headache in alert patients accounted for 0.5% (n = 353) of new patient episodes, 81.2% (n = 280) of patients had a primary headache disorder. One patient (0.3%) had an adequate history recorded. No patient had a complete examination recorded. Seventy seven (21.8%) patients underwent computed tomography of the head; 80.5% (n = 62) were normal. Lumbar puncture was performed in 23 (6.5%) cases; 18 (78.3%) were normal. A number of clinical features were found to be predictive of secondary headache.

Conclusion: Headache is an uncommon symptom in alert patients presenting to the ED. The recorded history, examination, and subsequent investigation do not comply with published standards. A number of predictive features have been identified that may permit the development of a clinical prediction rule to improve the management of this patient group.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (258.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Buckley N. A., Whyte I. M., Dawson A. H., Reith D. A. Preformatted admission charts for poisoning admissions facilitate clinical assessment and research. Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Oct;34(4 Pt 1):476–482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Edlow J. A., Caplan L. R. Avoiding pitfalls in the diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jan 6;342(1):29–36. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200001063420106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Edmeads J. Challenges in the diagnosis of acute headache. Headache. 1990;30 (Suppl 2):537–540. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1990.hed30s2537.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fodden D. I., Peatfield R. C., Milsom P. L. Beware the patient with a headache in the accident and emergency department. Arch Emerg Med. 1989 Mar;6(1):7–12. doi: 10.1136/emj.6.1.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Freitag F. G., Diamond M. Emergency treatment of headache. Med Clin North Am. 1991 May;75(3):749–761. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)30447-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MacNamara A. F., Brazil E., Evans P. A. Computed tomography of the head by the accident and emergency department--why 24 hour access is vital. J Accid Emerg Med. 1998 Sep;15(5):294–297. doi: 10.1136/emj.15.5.294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Marks D. R., Rapoport A. M. Practical evaluation and diagnosis of headache. Semin Neurol. 1997;17(4):307–312. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1040943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Newman L. C., Lipton R. B. Emergency department evaluation of headache. Neurol Clin. 1998 May;16(2):285–303. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8619(05)70065-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rasmussen B. K. Epidemiology of headache. Cephalalgia. 1995 Feb;15(1):45–68. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1995.1501045.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rigby A. S. Development of a scoring system to assist in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Methods Inf Med. 1991;30(1):23–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Schievink W. I. Intracranial aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 1997 Jan 2;336(1):28–40. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199701023360106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stiell I. G., Wells G. A. Methodologic standards for the development of clinical decision rules in emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Apr;33(4):437–447. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70309-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Vermeulen M., Hasan D., Blijenberg B. G., Hijdra A., van Gijn J. Xanthochromia after subarachnoid haemorrhage needs no revisitation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989 Jul;52(7):826–828. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.52.7.826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Vermeulen M., van Gijn J. The diagnosis of subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990 May;53(5):365–372. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.53.5.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wasson J. H., Sox H. C., Neff R. K., Goldman L. Clinical prediction rules. Applications and methodological standards. N Engl J Med. 1985 Sep 26;313(13):793–799. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198509263131306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES