Abstract
Methods: Data were analysed from a prospective, observational study of all patients transported to hospital by ambulance, who subsequently received intravenous thrombolysis at 20 hospitals and two ambulance services in Victoria, Australia (n = 1147). Regression models estimated the association between predictor variables age, sex, route of referral, symptom onset to call time, ambulance pre-notification of the receiving hospital, emergency department thrombolysis, and the outcome, time to thrombolysis. Further modelling estimated the number needed to treat to save one life by several recommended interventions to reduce time delays.
Results: Presentation via a rural hospital or general practitioner was associated with an approximate doubling of the onset to call time (2.08 and 2.30 respectively). Ambulance-hospital pre-notification and emergency department thrombolysis reduced door to needle times by 21% and 27% respectively. Modelling showed that each of the following interventions would be expected to save one life: 1069 hospital pre-notifications, 714 cases of emergency department thrombolysis, 184 cases of prehospital thrombolysis, 340 cases to bypass their rural hospital, or 50 cases to bypass their general practitioner.
Conclusions: Hospital pre-notification and emergency department thrombolysis reduce time delays, although the mortality impact seems to be modest. Prehospital thrombolysis has the potential to save lives, although validation in real practice is required. Advising patients to call directly for an ambulance, rather than the general practitioner, has the greatest potential to save lives.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (59.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Banerjee S., Rhoden W. E. Fast-tracking of myocardial infarction by paramedics. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1998 Jan-Feb;32(1):36–38. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Birkhead J. S. Trends in the provision of thrombolytic treatment between 1993 and 1997. Myocardial Infarction Audit Group. Heart. 1999 Oct;82(4):438–442. doi: 10.1136/hrt.82.4.438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boersma E., Maas A. C., Deckers J. W., Simoons M. L. Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: reappraisal of the golden hour. Lancet. 1996 Sep 21;348(9030):771–775. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)02514-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bryant M., Kelly A. M. "Point of entry" treatment gives best time to thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. Aust Health Rev. 2001;24(1):157–160. doi: 10.1071/ah010157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edhouse J. A., Sakr M., Wardrope J., Morris F. P. Thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: the safety and efficiency of treatment in the accident and emergency department. J Accid Emerg Med. 1999 Sep;16(5):325–330. doi: 10.1136/emj.16.5.325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelly Anne-Maree, Kerr Debra, Patrick Ian, Walker Tony. Call-to-needle times for thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction in Victoria. Med J Aust. 2003 Apr 21;178(8):381–385. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05255.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Millar-Craig M. W., Joy A. V., Adamowicz M., Furber R., Thomas B. Reduction in treatment delay by paramedic ECG diagnosis of myocardial infarction with direct CCU admission. Heart. 1997 Nov;78(5):456–461. doi: 10.1136/hrt.78.5.456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morrison L. J., Verbeek P. R., McDonald A. C., Sawadsky B. V., Cook D. J. Mortality and prehospital thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis. JAMA. 2000 May 24;283(20):2686–2692. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.20.2686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pitt K. Prehospital selection of patients for thrombolysis by paramedics. Emerg Med J. 2002 May;19(3):260–263. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.3.260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weaver W. D., Cerqueira M., Hallstrom A. P., Litwin P. E., Martin J. S., Kudenchuk P. J., Eisenberg M. Prehospital-initiated vs hospital-initiated thrombolytic therapy. The Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Trial. JAMA. 1993 Sep 8;270(10):1211–1216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White H. D. Moving cardiology to the front of the hospital. Heart. 2000 Dec;84(6):573–574. doi: 10.1136/heart.84.6.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]