Skip to main content
Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ logoLink to Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ
. 2004 Sep;21(5):614–618. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.011247

The emerging role of the emergency care practitioner

S Cooper 1, B Barrett 1, S Black 1, C Evans 1, C Real 1, S Williams 1, B Wright 1
PMCID: PMC1726445  PMID: 15333548

Abstract

Method: A constructivist methodology taking account of stakeholder input and drawing upon the constant comparisons of different group's construction of reality. Four practitioners completed reflective patient case studies and adapted patient report forms, which were compared with a second case group of 11 paramedics. In addition individual and focus groups interviews were performed with key stakeholders.

Results: In the comparison between ECP and paramedic roles, 331 paramedic incidents were compared with 170 ECP reports. ECPs treated 28% of patients on scene compared with 18% by paramedics (p = 0.007). Fifty per cent of ECPs patients were conveyed compared with 64% of paramedics (p = 0.000). Analysis of the 269 reflective reports and 14 stakeholder interviews revealed four key themes. Firstly, ECPs had a beneficial impact on the deployment of resources, especially relating to non-conveyance. Secondly, their training and education improved their decision making repertoire and developed their confidence for a leadership role. Thirdly, inter-agency collaboration and cooperation was improved, and finally, care benefits were increased especially relating to immediacy of treatment and referral mechanisms.

Conclusions: The results indicate that an investment in the ECP role could be beneficial, however, more work is required to evaluate the development of practice, the quality of care, and cost benefits.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (79.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bulstrode C., Bell Y., Gray M. Senior house officers: the lost tribes. 1993 Nov 17-Dec 14Br J Hosp Med. 50(10):572–573. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dale J., Higgins J., Williams S., Foster T., Snooks H., Crouch R., Hartley-Sharpe C., Glucksman E., Hooper R., George S. Computer assisted assessment and advice for "non-serious" 999 ambulance service callers: the potential impact on ambulance despatch. Emerg Med J. 2003 Mar;20(2):178–183. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.2.178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Girot E. A. Graduate nurses: critical thinkers or better decision makers? J Adv Nurs. 2000 Feb;31(2):288–297. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01298.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Marks P. J., Daniel T. D., Afolabi O., Spiers G., Nguyen-Van-Tam J. S. Emergency (999) calls to the ambulance service that do not result in the patient being transported to hospital: an epidemiological study. Emerg Med J. 2002 Sep;19(5):449–452. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.5.449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Woods L. P. Implementing advanced practice: identifying the factors that facilitate and inhibit the process. J Clin Nurs. 1998 May;7(3):265–273. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.1998.00199.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Web-only Appendices]
emermedj_21_5_614__1.pdf (84.7KB, pdf)

Articles from Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES