Skip to main content
Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ logoLink to Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ
. 2004 Nov;21(6):692–697. doi: 10.1136/emj.2002.003707

Reviewing emergency care systems 2: measuring patient preferences using a discrete choice experiment

K Gerard 1, V Lattimer 1, J Turnbull 1, H Smith 1, S George 1, S Brailsford 1, S Maslin-Prothero 1
PMCID: PMC1726481  PMID: 15496695

Abstract

Objective: To investigate patients' strength of preferences for attributes associated with modernising delivery of out of hours emergency care services in Nottingham.

Methods: A discrete choice experiment was applied to quantify preferences for key attributes of out of hours emergency care. The attributes reflected the findings of previous research, current policy initiatives, and discussions with local key stakeholders. A self complete questionnaire was administered to NHS Direct callers and adults attending accident and emergency, GP services and NHS walk-in centre. Regression analysis was used to estimate the relative importance of the different attributes.

Results: Response was 74% (n = 457) although 61% (n = 378) were useable. All attributes were statistically significant. Being consulted by a doctor was the most important attribute. This was followed by being consulted by a nurse, being kept informed about waiting time, and quality of the consultation. Respondents were prepared to wait an extra 2 hours 20 minutes to be consulted by a doctor. There were no measurable preference differences between patients surveyed at different NHS entry points. Younger respondents preferred single telephone call access to health care out of hours. Although having services provided close to home and making contact in person were generally preferred, they were less important than others, suggesting that a range of service locations may be acceptable to patients.

Conclusions: This study showed that local solutions for reforming emergency out of hours care should take account of the strength of patient preferences. The method was acceptable and the results have directly informed the development of a local service framework for emergency care.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (91.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cooke M. W., Wilson S., Pearson S. The effect of a separate stream for minor injuries on accident and emergency department waiting times. Emerg Med J. 2002 Jan;19(1):28–30. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.1.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lattimer V., Brailsford S., Turnbull J., Tarnaras P., Smith H., George S., Gerard K., Maslin-Prothero S. Reviewing emergency care systems I: insights from system dynamics modelling. Emerg Med J. 2004 Nov;21(6):685–691. doi: 10.1136/emj.2002.003673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Morgan A., Shackley P., Pickin M., Brazier J. Quantifying patient preferences for out-of-hours primary care. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000 Oct;5(4):214–218. doi: 10.1177/135581960000500405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ryan M., Farrar S. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. BMJ. 2000 Jun 3;320(7248):1530–1533. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ryan M., McIntosh E., Dean T., Old P. Trade-offs between location and waiting times in the provision of health care: the case of elective surgery on the Isle of Wight. J Public Health Med. 2000 Jun;22(2):202–210. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/22.2.202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Salisbury C., Trivella M., Bruster S. Demand for and supply of out of hours care from general practitioners in England and Scotland: observational study based on routinely collected data. BMJ. 2000 Mar 4;320(7235):618–621. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7235.618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Salisbury C., Trivella M., Bruster S. Demand for and supply of out of hours care from general practitioners in England and Scotland: observational study based on routinely collected data. BMJ. 2000 Mar 4;320(7235):618–621. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7235.618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Scott Anthony, Watson M. Stuart, Ross Sue. Eliciting preferences of the community for out of hours care provided by general practitioners: a stated preference discrete choice experiment. Soc Sci Med. 2003 Feb;56(4):803–814. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00079-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Venning P., Durie A., Roland M., Roberts C., Leese B. Randomised controlled trial comparing cost effectiveness of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in primary care. BMJ. 2000 Apr 15;320(7241):1048–1053. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7241.1048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Vick S., Scott A. Agency in health care. Examining patients' preferences for attributes of the doctor-patient relationship. J Health Econ. 1998 Oct;17(5):587–605. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(97)00035-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. van der Pol M., Cairns J. Estimating time preferences for health using discrete choice experiments. Soc Sci Med. 2001 May;52(9):1459–1470. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00256-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES