Abstract
The in vitro activities of temafloxacin (A63004) and lomefloxacin (SC-47111; NY-198) were compared with those of seven other antibiotics against 146 isolates of bacterial enteric pathogens, including Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. Ciprofloxacin was the most active drug against the Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia, and Vibrio spp. tested. Lomefloxacin, temafloxacin, and difloxacin were the most active drugs tested against Campylobacter spp. (MIC for 90% of strains, 0.125 to 0.25 micrograms/ml).
Full text
PDF


Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Chin N. X., Figueredo V. M., Novelli A., Neu H. C. In vitro activity of temafloxacin, a new difluoro quinolone antimicrobial agent. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988 Feb;7(1):58–63. doi: 10.1007/BF01962176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chin N. X., Novelli A., Neu H. C. In vitro activity of lomefloxacin (SC-47111; NY-198), a difluoroquinolone 3-carboxylic acid, compared with those of other quinolones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 May;32(5):656–662. doi: 10.1128/aac.32.5.656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chow A. W., Cheng N., Bartlett K. H. In vitro susceptibility of Clostridium difficile to new beta-lactam and quinolone antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Dec;28(6):842–844. doi: 10.1128/aac.28.6.842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delmee M., Avesani V. Comparative in vitro activity of seven quinolones against 100 clinical isolates of Clostridium difficile. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Feb;29(2):374–375. doi: 10.1128/aac.29.2.374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ericsson C. D., Johnson P. C., Dupont H. L., Morgan D. R., Bitsura J. A., de la Cabada F. J. Ciprofloxacin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as initial therapy for travelers' diarrhea. A placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Feb;106(2):216–220. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-2-216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fliegelman R. M., Petrak R. M., Goodman L. J., Segreti J., Trenholme G. M., Kaplan R. L. Comparative in vitro activities of twelve antimicrobial agents against Campylobacter species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Mar;27(3):429–430. doi: 10.1128/aac.27.3.429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goodman L. J., Fliegelman R. M., Trenholme G. M., Kaplan R. L. Comparative in vitro activity of ciprofloxacin against Campylobacter spp. and other bacterial enteric pathogens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Apr;25(4):504–506. doi: 10.1128/aac.25.4.504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goossens H., De Mol P., Coignau H., Levy J., Grados O., Ghysels G., Innocent H., Butzler J. P. Comparative in vitro activities of aztreonam, ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, HR 810 (a new cephalosporin), RU28965 (a new macrolide), and other agents against enteropathogens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Mar;27(3):388–392. doi: 10.1128/aac.27.3.388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hardy D. J., Swanson R. N., Hensey D. M., Ramer N. R., Bower R. R., Hanson C. W., Chu D. T., Fernandes P. B. Comparative antibacterial activities of temafloxacin hydrochloride (A-62254) and two reference fluoroquinolones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Nov;31(11):1768–1774. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.11.1768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harvey S. M. Hippurate hydrolysis by Campylobacter fetus. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Apr;11(4):435–437. doi: 10.1128/jcm.11.4.435-437.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hirose T., Okezaki E., Kato H., Ito Y., Inoue M., Mitsuhashi S. In vitro and in vivo activity of NY-198, a new difluorinated quinolone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Jun;31(6):854–859. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.6.854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keusch G. T. Antimicrobial therapy for enteric infections and typhoid fever: state of the art. Rev Infect Dis. 1988 Jan-Feb;10 (Suppl 1):S199–S205. doi: 10.1093/clinids/10.supplement_1.s199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morrison P. J., Mant T. G., Norman G. T., Robinson J., Kunka R. L. Pharmacokinetics and tolerance of lomefloxacin after sequentially increasing oral doses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Oct;32(10):1503–1507. doi: 10.1128/aac.32.10.1503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pichler H. E., Diridl G., Stickler K., Wolf D. Clinical efficacy of ciprofloxacin compared with placebo in bacterial diarrhea. Am J Med. 1987 Apr 27;82(4A):329–332. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stone J. W., Andrews J. M., Ashby J. P., Griggs D., Wise R. Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of orally administered lomefloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Oct;32(10):1508–1510. doi: 10.1128/aac.32.10.1508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van der Auwera P., Grenier P., Glupczynski Y., Pierard D. In-vitro activity of lomefloxacin in comparison with pefloxacin and ofloxacin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989 Feb;23(2):209–219. doi: 10.1093/jac/23.2.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wise R., Andrews J. M., Ashby J. P., Matthews R. S. In vitro activity of lomefloxacin, a new quinolone antimicrobial agent, in comparison with those of other agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 May;32(5):617–622. doi: 10.1128/aac.32.5.617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]