Abstract
Background: Performance of emergency departments in England and Wales has declined in recent years. Data from the authors' department has shown that junior doctors now see fewer patients and spend longer over their assessment than was the case previously. This study aimed to determine how the assessment of patients with isolated ankle injuries changed over an 11 year period.
Methods: A retrospective case note review was conducted. Data regarding the duration of assessment, clinical information recorded, investigations, and treatments were retrieved.
Results: During the period studied 13 555 patients presented with isolated ankle injuries; case notes of 550 of these patients were reviewed in the present study. Linear regression demonstrated that the median length of time from arrival in the department until seen by a clinician increased (b = 3.0 min/year, 95% CI 0.7 to 5.2, p = 0.015), but the median length of time from seeing a clinician until leaving the department was unchanged (b = 0.6 min/year, 95% CI –1.3 to 2.5, p = 0.475). More clinical information was being recorded, but the proportion of patients having radiographs of the ankle (b = 0.24% per year, 95% CI –1.40% to 1.87%, p = 0.751) or in whom a fracture was diagnosed (b = –0.20% per year, 95% CI –1.59% to 1.19% per year, p = 0.752) remained unchanged.
Conclusion: It appears from this study that the duration of assessment of patients with minor injuries is not changing although this result should be interpreted cautiously.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (68.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Armon K., Stephenson T., Gabriel V., MacFaul R., Eccleston P., Werneke U., Smith S. Determining the common medical presenting problems to an accident and emergency department. Arch Dis Child. 2001 May;84(5):390–392. doi: 10.1136/adc.84.5.390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bazarian J. J., Schneider S. M., Newman V. J., Chodosh J. Do admitted patients held in the emergency department impact the throughput of treat-and-release patients? Acad Emerg Med. 1996 Dec;3(12):1113–1118. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03370.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cooke M. W., Wilson S., Pearson S. The effect of a separate stream for minor injuries on accident and emergency department waiting times. Emerg Med J. 2002 Jan;19(1):28–30. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.1.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Locker T., Mason S., Wardrope J., Walters S. Targets and moving goal posts: changes in waiting times in a UK emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2005 Oct;22(10):710–714. doi: 10.1136/emj.2004.019042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sakr M., Angus J., Perrin J., Nixon C., Nicholl J., Wardrope J. Care of minor injuries by emergency nurse practitioners or junior doctors: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1999 Oct 16;354(9187):1321–1326. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)02447-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stiell I. G., Greenberg G. H., McKnight R. D., Nair R. C., McDowell I., Worthington J. R. A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Apr;21(4):384–390. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82656-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stiell I. G., McKnight R. D., Greenberg G. H., McDowell I., Nair R. C., Wells G. A., Johns C., Worthington J. R. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules. JAMA. 1994 Mar 16;271(11):827–832. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]