Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ logoLink to Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ
. 2005 Mar;22(3):171–176. doi: 10.1136/emj.2004.020180

Rationing in the emergency department: the good, the bad, and the unacceptable

E Cross 1, S Goodacre 1, A O'Cathain 1, J Arnold 1
PMCID: PMC1726698  PMID: 15735262

Abstract

Objectives: Waiting times in emergency departments (EDs) are an important government priority. Although substantial efforts are currently being made to reduce waiting times, little attention has been paid to the patients' view. We used qualitative methods to explore patients' perspectives on waiting times and other approaches to rationing and prioritisation.

Methods: Face to face, in depth, qualitative interviews (n = 11) explored how patients valued waiting times for non-urgent ED care. The framework approach (identifying a thematic framework through repeated re-reading) was used to analyse transcripts.

Results: Interviewees found some forms of rationing and prioritisation acceptable. They expected rationing by delay, but required explanations or information on the reason for their wait. They valued prioritisation by triage (rationing by selection) and thought that this role could be expanded for the re-direction of non-urgent patients elsewhere (rationing by deflection). Interviewees were mainly unwilling or unable to engage in prioritisation of different types of patients, openly prioritising only those with obvious clinical need, and children. However, some interviewees were willing to ration implicitly, labelling some attenders as inappropriate, such as those causing a nuisance. Others felt it was unacceptable to blame "inappropriate" attenders, as their attendance may relate to lack of information or awareness of service use. Explicit rationing between services was not acceptable, although some believed there were more important priorities for NHS resources than ED waiting times. Interviewees disagreed with the hypothetical notion of paying to be seen more quickly in the ED (rationing by charging).

Conclusions: Interviewees expected to wait and accepted the need for prioritisation, although they were reluctant to engage in judgements regarding prioritisation. They supported the re-direction of patients with certain non-urgent complaints. However, they perceived a need for more explanation and information about their wait, the system, and alternative services.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (79.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bruce T. A., Bowman J. M., Brown S. T. Factors that influence patient satisfaction in the emergency department. J Nurs Care Qual. 1998 Dec;13(2):31–37. doi: 10.1097/00001786-199812000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bursch B., Beezy J., Shaw R. Emergency department satisfaction: what matters most? Ann Emerg Med. 1993 Mar;22(3):586–591. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81947-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cheung W. W. H., Heeney L., Pound J. L. An advance triage system. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2002 Jan;10(1):10–16. doi: 10.1054/aaen.2001.0315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cookson R., Dolan P. Public views on health care rationing: a group discussion study. Health Policy. 1999 Oct;49(1-2):63–74. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(99)00043-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Frank-Soltysiak Marie, Court Charles. Délais d'attente et satisfaction des patients aux urgences chirurgicales d'un centre universitaire. Presse Med. 2002 Nov 9;31(36):1690–1695. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goldwag Rachel, Berg Ayelet, Yuval Dan, Benbassat Jochanan. Predictors of patient dissatisfaction with emergency care. Isr Med Assoc J. 2002 Aug;4(8):603–606. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hedges Jerris R., Trout Andrew, Magnusson A. Roy. Satisfied Patients Exiting the Emergency Department (SPEED) Study. Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Jan;9(1):15–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01161.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jeffery R. Normal rubbish: deviant patients in casualty departments. Sociol Health Illn. 1979 Jun;1(1):90–107. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11006793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kologlu M., Agalar F., Cakmakci M. Emergency department information: does it effect patients' perception and satisfaction about the care given in an emergency department? Eur J Emerg Med. 1999 Sep;6(3):245–248. doi: 10.1097/00063110-199909000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Krishel S., Baraff L. J. Effect of emergency department information on patient satisfaction. Ann Emerg Med. 1993 Mar;22(3):568–572. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81943-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Leung G. M., Chan S. S., Chau P. Y., Chua S. C. Using conjoint analysis to assess patients' preferences when visiting emergency departments in Hong Kong. Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Sep;8(9):894–898. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01151.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lloyd G., Skarratts D., Robinson N., Reid C. Communication skills training for emergency department senior house officers--a qualitative study. J Accid Emerg Med. 2000 Jul;17(4):246–250. doi: 10.1136/emj.17.4.246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Maitra A., Chikhani C. Waiting times and patient satisfaction in the accident and emergency department. Arch Emerg Med. 1993 Dec;10(4):388–389. doi: 10.1136/emj.10.4.388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Morgan A., Shackley P., Pickin M., Brazier J. Quantifying patient preferences for out-of-hours primary care. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000 Oct;5(4):214–218. doi: 10.1177/135581960000500405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nelson D., Coleman K., Walker J. Why are you waiting? Formulating an information pamphlet for use in an accident and emergency department. Accid Emerg Nurs. 1997 Jan;5(1):39–41. doi: 10.1016/s0965-2302(97)90062-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Olsson M., Hansagi H. Repeated use of the emergency department: qualitative study of the patient's perspective. Emerg Med J. 2001 Nov;18(6):430–434. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.6.430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pope C., Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ. 1995 Jul 1;311(6996):42–45. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6996.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pope C., Ziebland S., Mays N. Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ. 2000 Jan 8;320(7227):114–116. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rajpar S. F., Smith M. A., Cooke M. W. Study of choice between accident and emergency departments and general practice centres for out of hours primary care problems. J Accid Emerg Med. 2000 Jan;17(1):18–21. doi: 10.1136/emj.17.1.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Smith J. On complexities of health systems, journals and associations. Aust Health Rev. 1998;21(1):3–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Thompson D. A., Yarnold P. R. Relating patient satisfaction to waiting time perceptions and expectations: the disconfirmation paradigm. Acad Emerg Med. 1995 Dec;2(12):1057–1062. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1995.tb03150.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Thompson D. A., Yarnold P. R., Williams D. R., Adams S. L. Effects of actual waiting time, perceived waiting time, information delivery, and expressive quality on patient satisfaction in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Dec;28(6):657–665. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70090-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Trout A., Magnusson A. R., Hedges J. R. Patient satisfaction investigations and the emergency department: what does the literature say? Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Jun;7(6):695–709. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb02050.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vázquez Quiroga B., Pardo Moreno G., Fernández Cantalejo G., Canals Aracil M., Delgado Nicolás M. A., Navas Alonso M. Por qué acuden nuestros pacientes a urgencias del hospital? Aten Primaria. 2000 Feb 28;25(3):172–175. doi: 10.1016/S0212-6567(00)78482-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Waseem Muhammad, Ravi Lalitha, Radeos Michael, Ganti Sandhya. Parental perception of waiting time and its influence on parental satisfaction in an urban pediatric emergency department: are parents accurate in determining waiting time? South Med J. 2003 Sep;96(9):880–883. doi: 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000054911.92771.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES