Skip to main content
PMC home page
Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ logoLink to Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ
. 2005 Mar;22(3):209–215. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.013482

Limited benefits of ambulance telemetry in delivering early thrombolysis: a randomised controlled trial

M Woollard 1, K Pitt 1, A Hayward 1, N Taylor 1
PMCID: PMC1726702  PMID: 15735276

Abstract

Methods: This prospective randomised controlled trial recruited patients using the 999 ambulance service in a rural area of the UK with signs or symptoms of coronary heart disease. Subjects were assigned to receive either standard paramedic treatment or transmission of 12 lead ECG, blood pressure, pulse oximetry, and relevant medical history to a general hospital coronary care unit. Cardiology senior house officers then determined each patient's suitability for pre-hospital thrombolysis time, and transmitted this decision back to the ambulance. This was documented as the potential thrombolysis, although no thrombolytic agents were administered by paramedics. The between groups difference in time to potential thrombolysis (intervention group) and actual thrombolysis (controls) was compared. The proportion of intervention group subjects ultimately receiving thrombolysis in hospital was compared with that recommended for pre-hospital thrombolysis.

Results: The potential reduction in call to treatment time for telemetry patients recommended for pre-hospital thrombolysis was 55 minutes (p = 0.022). Following hospital admission,21/213 of the telemetry patients were thrombolysed (10%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 6% to 15%). Of these patients, 3/21 received a recommendation for thrombolysis in the ambulance (14%, 95% CI 3.1% to 36.3%). The sensitivity and specificity of the telemetry system in detecting patients requiring thrombolysis was 13.6 and 99.5% respectively. Errors were made in the pre-hospital treatment recommendations for two patients.

Conclusions: Continuous telemetry systems may significantly reduce call to treatment times for patients recommended for pre-hospital thrombolysis in a rural setting. However, this benefit must be balanced against the very small proportion of eligible patients identified as suitable for pre-hospital thrombolysis. This limitation may be due to communications problems, the criteria used to identify eligible patients, or the seniority of physicians tasked with making treatment decisions.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (84.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altman D. G. Statistics and ethics in medical research: III How large a sample? Br Med J. 1980 Nov 15;281(6251):1336–1338. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6251.1336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aufderheide T. P., Hendley G. E., Woo J., Lawrence S., Valley V., Teichman S. L. A prospective evaluation of prehospital 12-lead ECG application in chest pain patients. J Electrocardiol. 1992;24 (Suppl):8–13. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(10)80004-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aufderheide T. P., Keelan M. H., Hendley G. E., Robinson N. A., Hastings T. E., Lewin R. F., Hewes H. F., Daniel A., Engle D., Gimbel B. K. Milwaukee Prehospital Chest Pain Project--phase I: feasibility and accuracy of prehospital thrombolytic candidate selection. Am J Cardiol. 1992 Apr 15;69(12):991–996. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90852-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boersma E., Maas A. C., Deckers J. W., Simoons M. L. Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: reappraisal of the golden hour. Lancet. 1996 Sep 21;348(9030):771–775. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)02514-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gibler W. B., Kereiakes D. J., Dean E. N., Martin L., Anderson L., Abbottsmith C. W., Blanton J., Blanton D., Morris J. A., Jr, Gibler C. D. Prehospital diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction: a north-south perspective. The Cincinnati Heart Project and the Nashville Prehospital TPA Trial. Am Heart J. 1991 Jan;121(1 Pt 1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(91)90948-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Karagounis L., Ipsen S. K., Jessop M. R., Gilmore K. M., Valenti D. A., Clawson J. J., Teichman S., Anderson J. L. Impact of field-transmitted electrocardiography on time to in-hospital thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1990 Oct 1;66(10):786–791. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90352-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Keeling Phil, Hughes Debbie, Price Linnie, Shaw Steve, Barton Andy. Safety and feasibility of prehospital thrombolysis carried out by paramedics. BMJ. 2003 Jul 5;327(7405):27–28. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7405.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kereiakes D. J., Gibler W. B., Martin L. H., Pieper K. S., Anderson L. C. Relative importance of emergency medical system transport and the prehospital electrocardiogram on reducing hospital time delay to therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a preliminary report from the Cincinnati Heart Project. Am Heart J. 1992 Apr;123(4 Pt 1):835–840. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(92)90684-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pedley David K., Bissett Kim, Connolly Elizabeth M., Goodman Carol G., Golding Ian, Pringle T. H., McNeill G. P., Pringle S. D., Jones M. C. Prospective observational cohort study of time saved by prehospital thrombolysis for ST elevation myocardial infarction delivered by paramedics. BMJ. 2003 Jul 5;327(7405):22–26. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7405.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pitt K. Prehospital selection of patients for thrombolysis by paramedics. Emerg Med J. 2002 May;19(3):260–263. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.3.260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rawles J. M. Quantification of the benefit of earlier thrombolytic therapy: five-year results of the Grampian Region Early Anistreplase Trial (GREAT). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Nov 1;30(5):1181–1186. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00299-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Saltissi S., Mushahwar S. S. The management of acute myocardial infarction. Postgrad Med J. 1995 Sep;71(839):534–541. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.71.839.534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Weaver W. D., Eisenberg M. S., Martin J. S., Litwin P. E., Shaeffer S. M., Ho M. T., Kudenchuk P., Hallstrom A. P., Cerqueira M. D., Copass M. K. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project--phase I: patient characteristics and feasibility of prehospital initiation of thrombolytic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Apr;15(5):925–931. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90218-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES