Skip to main content
PMC home page
Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ logoLink to Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ
. 2005 Mar;22(3):165–170. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.007674

Urban legend versus rural reality: patients' experience of attendance at accident and emergency departments in west Wales

C Palmer 1, K Jones 1, P Jones 1, S Polacarz 1, G Evans 1
PMCID: PMC1726710  PMID: 15735261

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate why and how patients decide to attend accident and emergency (A&E) departments, and to assess their satisfaction with the experience, in a predominantly rural west Wales population.

Methods: This was a semi-structured follow up telephone interview of patients who walked in to A&E in one of four general hospitals in west Wales and were triaged as Manchester Triage score 4 or 5. Patients were recruited by nurses during the period July–November 2002. The study sample consisted of 176 male and 145 female patients, mean (SD) age 36.6 (20.0) years. The main outcome measure was a quantitative and qualitative description of the recalled experiences of A&E attenders, the circumstances of their attendance, and their satisfaction with the experience.

Results: Of the study sample, 78% attended with injury or illnesses of recent origin, and 50% with actual or presumed musculoskeletal injury, 73% of which were sustained within 10 miles of home. Travel to hospital was by private transport for 86%, average distance 7.4 miles. The majority (90%) were registered with a local GP, but 32% felt A&E was the obvious choice, and a further 44% considered their GP inaccessible to their needs. Patients' reasons for seeking health care at A&E were similar to those described in an English urban study. Waiting times were rarely excessive; 80% left within 2 hours, and patient satisfaction was generally high. Among the 87 patients (27%) who reported a less satisfactory experience, 48 (55%) of these complained of dismissive attitudes of doctors.

Conclusions: Anecdotal accounts of abuse of A&E services and unreasonable patient expectations gain the status of "urban legends" within the medical profession. Among the predominantly settled rural population in west Wales, there is little evidence of unreasonable patient expectations, and most patients report high satisfaction levels. Patients' bad experiences most frequently arise from a dismissive attitude on the part of medical staff. These attitudes are often consequent on an A&E culture that views some patients' attendances as less appropriate than others.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (82.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Avery A. J., Groom L., Boot D., Earwicker S., Carlisle R. What problems do patients present with outside normal general practice surgery hours? A prospective study of the use of general practice and accident and emergency services. J Public Health Med. 1999 Mar;21(1):88–94. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/21.1.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell J. L. General practitioner appointment systems, patient satisfaction, and use of accident and emergency services--a study in one geographical area. Fam Pract. 1994 Dec;11(4):438–445. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.4.438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carlisle R., Groom L. M., Avery A. J., Boot D., Earwicker S. Relation of out of hours activity by general practice and accident and emergency services with deprivation in Nottingham: longitudinal survey. BMJ. 1998 Feb 14;316(7130):520–523. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7130.520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coleman P., Irons R., Nicholl J. Will alternative immediate care services reduce demands for non-urgent treatment at accident and emergency? Emerg Med J. 2001 Nov;18(6):482–487. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.6.482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dale J., Dolan B. Do patients use minor injury units appropriately? J Public Health Med. 1996 Jun;18(2):152–156. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dale J., Green J., Reid F., Glucksman E., Higgs R. Primary care in the accident and emergency department: II. Comparison of general practitioners and hospital doctors. BMJ. 1995 Aug 12;311(7002):427–430. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7002.427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dale J., Green J., Reid F., Glucksman E. Primary care in the accident and emergency department: I. Prospective identification of patients. BMJ. 1995 Aug 12;311(7002):423–426. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7002.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dale J., Lang H., Roberts J. A., Green J., Glucksman E. Cost effectiveness of treating primary care patients in accident and emergency: a comparison between general practitioners, senior house officers, and registrars. BMJ. 1996 May 25;312(7042):1340–1344. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7042.1340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dale J. Primary care: the old bugbear of accident and emergency services. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Mar;42(356):90–91. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Freeman G. K., Meakin R. P., Lawrenson R. A., Leydon G. M., Craig G. Primary care units in A&E departments in North Thames in the 1990s: initial experience and future implications. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Feb;49(439):107–110. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gaffney P., Crane S., Johnson G., Playforth M. An analysis of calls referred to the emergency 999 service by NHS Direct. Emerg Med J. 2001 Jul;18(4):302–304. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.4.302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hull S. A., Jones I. R., Moser K. Factors influencing the attendance rate at accident and emergency departments in East London: the contributions of practice organization, population characteristics and distance. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997 Jan;2(1):6–13. doi: 10.1177/135581969700200104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jankowski R. F., Mandalia S. Comparison of attendance and emergency admission patterns at accident and emergency departments in and out of London. BMJ. 1993 May 8;306(6887):1241–1243. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6887.1241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Murphy A. W. 'Inappropriate' attenders at accident and emergency departments I: definition, incidence and reasons for attendance. Fam Pract. 1998 Feb;15(1):23–32. doi: 10.1093/fampra/15.1.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Murphy A. W. 'Inappropriate' attenders at accident and emergency departments II: health service responses. Fam Pract. 1998 Feb;15(1):33–37. doi: 10.1093/fampra/15.1.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Murphy A. W., Bury G., Plunkett P. K., Gibney D., Smith M., Mullan E., Johnson Z. Randomised controlled trial of general practitioner versus usual medical care in an urban accident and emergency department: process, outcome, and comparative cost. BMJ. 1996 May 4;312(7039):1135–1142. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7039.1135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sanders J. A review of health professional attitudes and patient perceptions on 'inappropriate' accident and emergency attendances. The implications for current minor injury service provision in England and Wales. J Adv Nurs. 2000 May;31(5):1097–1105. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01379.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stoddart D., Ireland A. J., Crawford R., Kelly B. Impact on an accident and emergency department of Glasgow's new primary care emergency service. Health Bull (Edinb) 1999 May;57(3):186–191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Walsh M. The health belief model and use of accident and emergency services by the general public. J Adv Nurs. 1995 Oct;22(4):694–699. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22040694.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wise M. Inappropriate attendance in accident and emergency. Accid Emerg Nurs. 1997 Apr;5(2):102–106. doi: 10.1016/s0965-2302(97)90091-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES