Skip to main content
PMC home page
Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ logoLink to Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ
. 2005 Aug;22(8):538–540. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.013755

Cranial computed tomography in trauma: the accuracy of interpretation by staff in the emergency department

B Mucci 1, C Brett 1, L Huntley 1, M Greene 1
PMCID: PMC1726873  PMID: 16046750

Abstract

Objectives: Cranial computed tomography (CT) is replacing skull radiography in head trauma. Rapid radiological opinions on these images may not always be available. We assessed the ability of our permanent emergency department staff to interpret the images.

Methods: A retrospective series of 100 consecutive cases was reviewed and interpreted by five permanent emergency department medical staff, and their interpretation compared with the consensus opinion of two radiologists.

Results: An overall agreement of 86.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 83.4 to 89.9) was achieved, with a false negative rate of 4.2% (95% CI 3.9 to 4.3). No findings that would have changed the overnight management of any patient were missed.

Conclusions: Our results for CT scans are similar to studies of interpretation of other radiographic images in emergency departments. Our emergency staff could safely make the initial interpretation of cranial CT images in trauma out of hours, and formal reporting may wait until a suitably experienced radiologist is available.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (51.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alfaro D., Levitt M. A., English D. K., Williams V., Eisenberg R. Accuracy of interpretation of cranial computed tomography scans in an emergency medicine residency program. Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Feb;25(2):169–174. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70319-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benger J. R., Lyburn I. D. What is the effect of reporting all emergency department radiographs? Emerg Med J. 2003 Jan;20(1):40–43. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.1.40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eachempati S. R., Flomenbaum N., Seifert C., Fischer E., Hydo L. J., Barie P. S. Alterations of preliminary readings on radiographic examinations minimally affect outcomes of trauma patients discharged from the emergency department. J Trauma. 2000 Apr;48(4):654–658. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200004000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Espinosa J. A., Nolan T. W. Reducing errors made by emergency physicians in interpreting radiographs: longitudinal study. BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):737–740. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Guly H. R. Diagnostic errors in an accident and emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2001 Jul;18(4):263–269. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.4.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hillier J. C., Tattersall D. J., Gleeson F. V. Trainee reporting of computed tomography examinations: do they make mistakes and does it matter? Clin Radiol. 2004 Feb;59(2):159–158. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(03)00309-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Levitt M. A., Dawkins R., Williams V., Bullock S. Abbreviated educational session improves cranial computed tomography scan interpretations by emergency physicians. Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Nov;30(5):616–621. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70079-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mann F. A., Danz P. L. The night stalker effect: quality improvements with a dedicated night-call rotation. Invest Radiol. 1993 Jan;28(1):92–96. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199301000-00032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Perron A. D., Huff J. S., Ullrich C. G., Heafner M. D., Kline J. A. A multicenter study to improve emergency medicine residents' recognition of intracranial emergencies on computed tomography. Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Nov;32(5):554–562. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70032-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Robinson P. J., Wilson D., Coral A., Murphy A., Verow P. Variation between experienced observers in the interpretation of accident and emergency radiographs. Br J Radiol. 1999 Apr;72(856):323–330. doi: 10.1259/bjr.72.856.10474490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Roszler M. H., McCarroll K. A., Rashid T., Donovan K. R., Kling G. A. Resident interpretation of emergency computed tomographic scans. Invest Radiol. 1991 Apr;26(4):374–376. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199104000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Vincent C. A., Driscoll P. A., Audley R. J., Grant D. S. Accuracy of detection of radiographic abnormalities by junior doctors. Arch Emerg Med. 1988 Jun;5(2):101–109. doi: 10.1136/emj.5.2.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wardrope J., Chennells P. M. Should all casualty radiographs be reviewed? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Jun 1;290(6482):1638–1640. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6482.1638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wysoki M. G., Nassar C. J., Koenigsberg R. A., Novelline R. A., Faro S. H., Faerber E. N. Head trauma: CT scan interpretation by radiology residents versus staff radiologists. Radiology. 1998 Jul;208(1):125–128. doi: 10.1148/radiology.208.1.9646802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. de Lacey G., Barker A., Harper J., Wignall B. An assessment of the clinical effects of reporting accident and emergency radiographs. Br J Radiol. 1980 Apr;53(628):304–309. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-53-628-304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES