Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1989 Oct;33(10):1714–1720. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.10.1714

Postantibiotic effects of imipenem, norfloxacin, and amikacin in vitro and in vivo.

J Renneberg 1, M Walder 1
PMCID: PMC172743  PMID: 2511798

Abstract

The postantibiotic effects (PAEs) of imipenem and norfloxacin were tested against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus (Enterococcus) faecalis, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Amikacin was tested against the same bacteria except Streptococcus faecalis. For in vitro tests, a viable count-washing method was used, and for in vivo tests, the thread technique in normal mice was used. All three drugs produced PAEs of 1.1 to 3.8 h in vitro and 1.4 to 4.3 h in vivo against the pathogens tested. In vitro and in vivo results correlated well. The PAE had a significantly (P less than 0.01 to 0.001) longer duration in vivo than in vitro, but the PAE of imipenem on Staphylococcus aureus was longer in vitro. The PAE was not due to residual antibiotics at the site of infection, and no PAE was obtained if at any time the antibiotic concentration at the infection site reached the MIC for the pathogen tested. The results indicate that the presence of a PAE may enable antibiotics to be given more intermittently without a loss of efficacy and that the PAE can only be induced if the level of the antibiotic exceeds the MIC for the pathogen in question for at least several minutes.

Full text

PDF
1714

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baquero F., Culebras E., Patrón C., Pérez-Díaz J. C., Medrano J. C., Vicente M. F. Postantibiotic effect of imipenem on gram-positive and gram-negative micro-organisms. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1986 Dec;18 (Suppl E):47–59. doi: 10.1093/jac/18.supplement_e.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bodey G. P., Pan T. Effect of cephalothin on growth patterns of micro-organisms. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 1976 Oct;29(10):1092–1095. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.29.1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bundtzen R. W., Gerber A. U., Cohn D. L., Craig W. A. Postantibiotic suppression of bacterial growth. Rev Infect Dis. 1981 Jan-Feb;3(1):28–37. doi: 10.1093/clinids/3.1.28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bustamante C. I., Drusano G. L., Tatem B. A., Standiford H. C. Postantibiotic effect of imipenem on Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Nov;26(5):678–682. doi: 10.1128/aac.26.5.678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Craig W. Pharmacokinetic and experimental data on beta-lactam antibiotics in the treatment of patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Dec;3(6):575–578. doi: 10.1007/BF02013628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dalhoff A., Stübner G. Comparative analysis of the antimicrobial action of polymorphonuclear leucocytes in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1985 Jan;15 (Suppl A):283–291. doi: 10.1093/jac/15.suppl_a.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Drake T. A., Scheld W. M., Sande M. A. Effects of sub-bactericidal concentrations of antibiotics in experimental models of endocarditis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1985 Jan;15 (Suppl A):293–296. doi: 10.1093/jac/15.suppl_a.293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. EAGLE H., FLEISCHMAN R., MUSSELMAN A. D. The bactericidal action of penicillin in vivo: the participation of the host, and the slow recovery of the surviving organisms. Ann Intern Med. 1950 Sep;33(3):544–571. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-33-3-544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eagle H., Musselman A. D. THE SLOW RECOVERY OF BACTERIA FROM THE TOXIC EFFECTS OF PENICILLIN. J Bacteriol. 1949 Oct;58(4):475–490. doi: 10.1128/jb.58.4.475-490.1949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eagle H. THE RECOVERY OF BACTERIA FROM THE TOXIC EFFECTS OF PENICILLIN. J Clin Invest. 1949 Sep;28(5 Pt 1):832–836. doi: 10.1172/JCI102161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fuursted K. Post-antibiotic effect and killing activity of ciprofloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B. 1987 Jun;95(3):199–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1987.tb03112.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fuursted K. Post-antibiotic effect of ciprofloxacin on Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Jun;6(3):271–274. doi: 10.1007/BF02017611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gengo F. M., Mannion T. W., Nightingale C. H., Schentag J. J. Integration of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of methicillin in curative treatment of experimental endocarditis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Dec;14(6):619–631. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.6.619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gerber A. U., Craig W. A., Brugger H. P., Feller C., Vastola A. P., Brandel J. Impact of dosing intervals on activity of gentamicin and ticarcillin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in granulocytopenic mice. J Infect Dis. 1983 May;147(5):910–917. doi: 10.1093/infdis/147.5.910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gudmundsson S., Vogelman B., Craig W. A. The in-vivo postantibiotic effect of imipenem and other new antimicrobials. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1986 Dec;18 (Suppl E):67–73. doi: 10.1093/jac/18.supplement_e.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Haag R. Post-MIC effect of fosfomycin on Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro and in experimentally infected mice. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1985 Jan;15 (Suppl A):265–271. doi: 10.1093/jac/15.suppl_a.265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hunter P. A., Rolinson G. N., Witting D. A. Comparative activity of amoxycillin and ampicillin in an experimental bacterial infection in mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Sep;4(3):285–293. doi: 10.1128/aac.4.3.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ingerman M. J., Pitsakis P. G., Rosenberg A. F., Levison M. E. The importance of pharmacodynamics in determining the dosing interval in therapy for experimental pseudomonas endocarditis in the rat. J Infect Dis. 1986 Apr;153(4):707–714. doi: 10.1093/infdis/153.4.707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kunin C. M. Dosage schedules of antimicrobial agents: a historical review. Rev Infect Dis. 1981 Jan-Feb;3(1):4–11. doi: 10.1093/clinids/3.1.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lorian V. Low concentrations of antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1985 Jan;15 (Suppl A):15–26. doi: 10.1093/jac/15.suppl_a.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McDonald P. J., Craig W. A., Kunin C. M. Persistent effect of antibiotics on Staphylococcus aureus after exposure for limited periods of time. J Infect Dis. 1977 Feb;135(2):217–223. doi: 10.1093/infdis/135.2.217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. McDonald P. J., Wetherall B. L., Pruul H. Postantibiotic leukocyte enhancement: increased susceptibility of bacteria pretreated with antibiotics to activity of leukocytes. Rev Infect Dis. 1981 Jan-Feb;3(1):38–44. doi: 10.1093/clinids/3.1.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Odenholt I., Holm S. E., Cars O. An in vivo model for evaluation of the postantibiotic effect. Scand J Infect Dis. 1988;20(1):97–103. doi: 10.3109/00365548809117224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Olling S., Hanson L. A., Holmgren J., Jodal U., Lincoln K., Lindberg U. The bactericidal effect of normal human serum on E. coli strains from normals and from patients with urinary tract infections. Infection. 1973;1(1):24–28. doi: 10.1007/BF01638251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Parker R. F., Luse S. The Action of Penicillin on Staphylococcus: Further Observations on the Effect of a Short Exposure. J Bacteriol. 1948 Jul;56(1):75–81. doi: 10.1128/jb.56.1.75-81.1948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Peterson L. R., Hall W. H., Zinneman H. H., Gerding D. N. Standardization of a preparative ultracentrifuge method for quantitative determination or protein binding of seven antibiotics. J Infect Dis. 1977 Dec;136(6):778–783. doi: 10.1093/infdis/136.6.778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Powell S. H., Thompson W. L., Luthe M. A., Stern R. C., Grossniklaus D. A., Bloxham D. D., Groden D. L., Jacobs M. R., DiScenna A. O., Cash H. A. Once-daily vs. continuous aminoglycoside dosing: efficacy and toxicity in animal and clinical studies of gentamicin, netilmicin, and tobramycin. J Infect Dis. 1983 May;147(5):918–932. doi: 10.1093/infdis/147.5.918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Renneberg J., Walder M. A mouse model for simultaneous pharmacokinetic and efficacy studies of antibiotics at sites of infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988 Jul;22(1):51–60. doi: 10.1093/jac/22.1.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Roosendaal R., Bakker-Woudenberg I. A., van den Berg J. C., Michel M. F. Therapeutic efficacy of continuous versus intermittent administration of ceftazidime in an experimental Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia in rats. J Infect Dis. 1985 Aug;152(2):373–378. doi: 10.1093/infdis/152.2.373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sande M. A., Korzeniowski O. M., Allegro G. M., Brennan R. O., Zak O., Scheld W. M. Intermittent or continuous therapy of experimental meningitis due to Streptococcus pneumoniae in rabbits: preliminary observations on the postantibiotic effect in vivo. Rev Infect Dis. 1981 Jan-Feb;3(1):98–109. doi: 10.1093/clinids/3.1.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Täuber M. G., Zak O., Scheld W. M., Hengstler B., Sande M. A. The postantibiotic effect in the treatment of experimental meningitis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae in rabbits. J Infect Dis. 1984 Apr;149(4):575–583. doi: 10.1093/infdis/149.4.575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Van Etta L. L., Fasching C. E., Peterson L. R., Gerding D. N. Comparison study of the kinetics of ceftizoxime penetration into extravascular spaces with known surface area/volume ratio in vitro and in vivo in rabbits. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Jan;23(1):49–53. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.1.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Vogelman B. S., Craig W. A. Postantibiotic effects. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1985 Jan;15 (Suppl A):37–46. doi: 10.1093/jac/15.suppl_a.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Vogelman B., Gudmundsson S., Turnidge J., Leggett J., Craig W. A. In vivo postantibiotic effect in a thigh infection in neutropenic mice. J Infect Dis. 1988 Feb;157(2):287–298. doi: 10.1093/infdis/157.2.287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES