Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 1998 Mar;79(3):262–267. doi: 10.1136/hrt.79.3.262

A normal electrocardiogram precludes the need for left ventriculography in the assessment of coronary artery disease

M Khan 1, S Sinha 1, S Hayton 1, S Fynn 1, R Henderson 1, D Bennett 1
PMCID: PMC1728645  PMID: 9602660

Abstract

Objective—To assess whether a normal electrocardiogram can identify good left ventricular function and obviate the need for routine left ventriculography in patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation for suspected coronary artery disease.
Design—A prospective study of patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation.
Setting—A regional cardiac centre.
Patients—The electrocardiograms, coronary angiograms, and left ventriculograms of 391 consecutive patients undergoing investigations for suspected coronary artery disease were entered into the study. Patients with arrhythmias and cardiac pathologies other than coronary artery disease were excluded.
Main outcome measures—The electrocardiogram was assessed using a 29 point QRS scoring system, and classified by two cardiologists and a trainee cardiologist as normal or abnormal. Left ventricular function was assessed by digital ventriculography.
Results—The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of a QRS score of 0 (normal QRS complexes) for discriminating good left ventricular function (ejection fraction ⩾ 50%) were 92.6%, 41.5%, and 97.2%, respectively. The figures for a normal electrocardiogram as assessed by a doctor were 96.3%, 40.4%, and 98.6% for cardiologist A; 96.3%, 37.4%, and 98.4% for cardiologist B; and 94.4%, 49.6%, and 98.2% for the cardiology trainee.
Conclusions—If a cardiologist judges the ECG to be normal, left ventriculography is unnecessary and a formal QRS score does not improve reliability of this clinical judgment. Adopting this strategy would save £30-40 000 in consumables and 65-87 hours of catheter laboratory and staff time for a department catheterising 3000 patients with suspected coronary artery disease annually.

 Keywords: cardiac catheterisation;  electrocardiogram;  left ventricular ejection fraction

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (138.1 KB).

Figure 1  .

Figure 1  

Open in a new tab

A comparison between ejection fraction and QRS score.

Figure 2  .

Figure 2  

Open in a new tab

A Venn diagram to show differences in ECG interpretation between the three doctors. Numbers inside circles represent ECGs classified as abnormal.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson C. I., Harrison D. G., Stack N. C., Hindman N. B., Ideker R. E., Palmeri S. T., Selvester R. H., Wagner G. S. Evaluation of serial QRS changes during acute inferior myocardial infarction using a QRS scoring system. Am J Cardiol. 1983 Aug;52(3):252–256. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(83)90117-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chesebro J. H., Knatterud G., Roberts R., Borer J., Cohen L. S., Dalen J., Dodge H. T., Francis C. K., Hillis D., Ludbrook P. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial, Phase I: A comparison between intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase. Clinical findings through hospital discharge. Circulation. 1987 Jul;76(1):142–154. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.76.1.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DePace N. L., Iskandrian A. S., Hakki A. H., Kane S. A., Segal B. L. Use of QRS scoring and thallium-201 scintigraphy to assess left ventricular function after myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1982 Dec;50(6):1262–1268. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(82)90460-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fioretti P., Brower R. W., Lazzeroni E., Simoons M. L., Wijns W., Reiber J. H., Bos R. J., Hugenholtz P. G. Limitations of a QRS scoring system to assess left ventricular function and prognosis at hospital discharge after myocardial infarction. Br Heart J. 1985 Mar;53(3):248–252. doi: 10.1136/hrt.53.3.248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fisher M. L., Gottlieb S. S., Plotnick G. D., Greenberg N. L., Patten R. D., Bennett S. K., Hamilton B. P. Beneficial effects of metoprolol in heart failure associated with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Mar 15;23(4):943–950. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90641-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gaasch W. H. Diagnosis and treatment of heart failure based on left ventricular systolic or diastolic dysfunction. JAMA. 1994 Apr 27;271(16):1276–1280. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ideker R. E., Wagner G. S., Ruth W. K., Alonso D. R., Bishop S. P., Bloor C. M., Fallon J. T., Gottlieb G. J., Hackel D. B., Phillips H. R. Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size. II. Correlation with quantitative anatomic findings for anterior infarcts. Am J Cardiol. 1982 May;49(7):1604–1614. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(82)90235-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Khan M. A., King D., Davies K. N., Silas J. H. Practical cardiological skills and ECG interpretation amongst doctors. Br J Clin Pract. 1993 Jul-Aug;47(4):183–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nestico P. F., Hakki A. H., Iskandrian A. S. Effects of cardiac medications on ventricular performance: emphasis on evaluation with radionuclide angiography. Am Heart J. 1985 May;109(5 Pt 1):1070–1084. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(85)90251-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Packer M. Beta-blockade in the management of chronic heart failure. Another step in the conceptual evolution of a neurohormonal model of the disease. Eur Heart J. 1996 Apr;17 (Suppl B):21–23. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/17.suppl_b.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Palmeri S. T., Harrison D. G., Cobb F. R., Morris K. G., Harrell F. E., Ideker R. E., Selvester R. H., Wagner G. S. A QRS scoring system for assessing left ventricular function after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1982 Jan 7;306(1):4–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198201073060102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pfeffer M. A., Braunwald E., Moyé L. A., Basta L., Brown E. J., Jr, Cuddy T. E., Davis B. R., Geltman E. M., Goldman S., Flaker G. C. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Results of the survival and ventricular enlargement trial. The SAVE Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1992 Sep 3;327(10):669–677. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199209033271001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Roark S. F., Ideker R. E., Wagner G. S., Alonso D. R., Bishop S. P., Bloor C. M., Bramlet D. A., Edwards J. E., Fallon J. T., Gottlieb G. J. Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size. III. Correlation with quantitative anatomic findings for inferior infarcts. Am J Cardiol. 1983 Feb;51(3):382–389. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(83)80069-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sandler H., Dodge H. T. The use of single plane angiocardiograms for the calculation of left ventricular volume in man. Am Heart J. 1968 Mar;75(3):325–334. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(68)90089-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Seino Y., Staniloff H. M., Shell W. E., Mickle D., Shah P. K., Vyden J. K. Evaluation of a QRS scoring system in acute myocardial infarction: relation to infarct size, early stage left ventricular ejection fraction, and exercise performance. Am J Cardiol. 1983 Jul;52(1):37–42. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(83)90065-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sheehan F. H., Bolson E. L., Dodge H. T., Mathey D. G., Schofer J., Woo H. W. Advantages and applications of the centerline method for characterizing regional ventricular function. Circulation. 1986 Aug;74(2):293–305. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.74.2.293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Vasan R. S., Benjamin E. J., Levy D. Congestive heart failure with normal left ventricular systolic function. Clinical approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of diastolic heart failure. Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jan 22;156(2):146–157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wagner G. S., Freye C. J., Palmeri S. T., Roark S. F., Stack N. C., Ideker R. E., Harrell F. E., Jr, Selvester R. H. Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size. I. Specificity and observer agreement. Circulation. 1982 Feb;65(2):342–347. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.65.2.342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Young S. G., Abouantoun S., Savvides M., Madsen E. B., Froelicher V. Limitations of electrocardiographic scoring systems for estimation of left ventricular function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983 Jun;1(6):1479–1488. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(83)80052-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES