Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 1999 Apr;81(4):352–358. doi: 10.1136/hrt.81.4.352

Quality of life four years after acute myocardial infarction: short form 36 scores compared with a normal population

N Brown 1, M Melville 1, D Gray 1, T Young 1, J Munro 1, A Skene 1, J Hampton 1
PMCID: PMC1728997  PMID: 10092560

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—To assess the impact of myocardial infarction on quality of life in four year survivors compared to data from "community norms", and to determine factors associated with a poor quality of life.
DESIGN—Cohort study based on the Nottingham heart attack register.
SETTING—Two district general hospitals serving a defined urban/rural population.
SUBJECTS—All patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction during 1992 and alive at a median of four years.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES—Short form 36 (SF 36) domain and overall scores.
RESULTS—Of 900 patients with an acute myocardial infarction in 1992, there were 476 patients alive and capable of responding to a questionnaire in 1997. The response rate was 424 (89.1%). Compared to age and sex adjusted normative data, patients aged under 65 years exhibited impairment in all eight domains, the largest differences being in physical functioning (mean difference 20 points), role physical (mean difference 23 points), and general health (mean difference 19 points). In patients over 65 years mean domain scores were similar to community norms. Multiple regression analysis revealed that impaired quality of life was closely associated with inability to return to work through ill health, a need for coronary revascularisation, the use of anxiolytics, hypnotics or inhalers, the need for two or more angina drugs, a frequency of chest pain one or more times per week, and a Rose dyspnoea score of ⩾ 2.
CONCLUSIONS—The SF 36 provides valuable additional information for the practising clinician. Compared to community norms the greatest impact on quality of life is seen in patients of working age. Impaired quality of life was reported by patients unfit for work, those with angina and dyspnoea, patients with coexistent lung disease, and those with anxiety and sleep disturbances. Improving quality of life after myocardial infarction remains a challenge for physicians.

 Keywords: quality of life; acute myocardial infarction; short form 36

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (145.2 KB).

Figure 1  .

Figure 1  

Open in a new tab

Mean (95% CI) SF 36 scores for four year myocardial infarction survivors aged under 65 years compared to age and sex adjusted Oxford norms.

Figure 2  .

Figure 2  

Open in a new tab

Mean (95% CI) SF 36 scores for four year myocardial infarction survivors aged over 65 years compared to age and sex adjusted Sheffield norms.

Figure 3  .

Figure 3  

Open in a new tab

Mean (95% CI) age specific SF 36 domain scores for four year myocardial infarction survivors compared to normative data.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brazier J. E., Harper R., Jones N. M., O'Cathain A., Thomas K. J., Usherwood T., Westlake L. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992 Jul 18;305(6846):160–164. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Calkins D. R., Rubenstein L. V., Cleary P. D., Davies A. R., Jette A. M., Fink A., Kosecoff J., Young R. T., Brook R. H., Delbanco T. L. Failure of physicians to recognize functional disability in ambulatory patients. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Mar 15;114(6):451–454. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-114-6-451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cook D. G., Shaper A. G., MacFarlane P. W. Using the WHO (Rose) angina questionnaire in cardiovascular epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 1989 Sep;18(3):607–613. doi: 10.1093/ije/18.3.607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Glasziou P. P., Bromwich S., Simes R. J. Quality of life six months after myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy. AUS-TASK Group. Australian arm of International tPA/SK Mortality Trial. Med J Aust. 1994 Nov 7;161(9):532–536. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1994.tb127596.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gray D., Keating N. A., Murdock J., Skene A. M., Hampton J. R. Impact of hospital thrombolysis policy on out-of-hospital response to suspected myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1993 Mar 13;341(8846):654–657. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90420-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hunt S. M., McEwen J., McKenna S. P. Perceived health: age and sex comparisons in a community. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1984 Jun;38(2):156–160. doi: 10.1136/jech.38.2.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jenkinson C., Coulter A., Wright L. Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. BMJ. 1993 May 29;306(6890):1437–1440. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6890.1437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jenkinson C., Wright L., Coulter A. The SF 36 health survey questionnaire. ...if used within its limits. BMJ. 1993 Aug 14;307(6901):449–449. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6901.449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jones D. A., West R. R. Psychological rehabilitation after myocardial infarction: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 1996 Dec 14;313(7071):1517–1521. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7071.1517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mark D. B., Naylor C. D., Hlatky M. A., Califf R. M., Topol E. J., Granger C. B., Knight J. D., Nelson C. L., Lee K. L., Clapp-Channing N. E. Use of medical resources and quality of life after acute myocardial infarction in Canada and the United States. N Engl J Med. 1994 Oct 27;331(17):1130–1135. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199410273311706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McHorney C. A., Ware J. E., Jr, Raczek A. E. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993 Mar;31(3):247–263. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199303000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Oldridge N., Guyatt G., Jones N., Crowe J., Singer J., Feeny D., McKelvie R., Runions J., Streiner D., Torrance G. Effects on quality of life with comprehensive rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1991 May 15;67(13):1084–1089. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90870-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pocock S. J., Henderson R. A., Seed P., Treasure T., Hampton J. R. Quality of life, employment status, and anginal symptoms after coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery. 3-year follow-up in the Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) Trial. Circulation. 1996 Jul 15;94(2):135–142. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.2.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ross C. K., Sinacore J. M., Stiers W., Budiman-Mak E. The role of expectations and preferences in health care satisfaction of patients with arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 1990 Jun;3(2):92–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ruta D., Garratt A., Abdalla M., Buckingham K., Russell I. The SF 36 health survey questionnaire. A valid measure of health status... BMJ. 1993 Aug 14;307(6901):448–449. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6901.448-b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Singleton N., Turner A. Measuring patients' views of their health. SF 36 is suitable for elderly patients. BMJ. 1993 Jul 10;307(6896):126–127. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6896.126-b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ware J. E., Jr, Sherbourne C. D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473–483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Westin L., Carlsson R., Israelsson B., Willenheimer R., Cline C., McNeil T. F. Quality of life in patients with ischaemic heart disease: a prospective controlled study. J Intern Med. 1997 Sep;242(3):239–247. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1997.00203.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wiklund I., Herlitz J., Hjalmarson A. Quality of life five years after myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1989 May;10(5):464–472. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES