Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 1999 May;81(5):470–477. doi: 10.1136/hrt.81.5.470

Appropriateness of referral of coronary angiography patients in Sweden

S Bernstein 1, B Brorsson 1, T Aberg 1, H Emanuelsson 1, R Brook 1, L Werko 1
PMCID: PMC1729044  PMID: 10212163

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To evaluate the appropriateness of referral following coronary angiography in Sweden. 
DESIGN—Prospective survey and review of medical records.
PATIENTS—Consecutive series of 2767 patients who underwent coronary angiography in Sweden between May 1994 and January 1995 and were considered for coronary revascularisation. 
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES—Percentage of patients referred for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) for indications that were judged necessary, appropriate, uncertain, and inappropriate by a multispecialty Swedish national expert panel using the RAND/University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) appropriateness method, and the percentage of patients referred for continued medical management who met necessity criteria for revascularisation.
RESULTS—Half the patients were referred for CABG, 25% for PTCA, and 25% for continued medical therapy. CABG was judged appropriate or necessary for 78% of patients, uncertain for 12% and inappropriate for 10%. For PTCA the figures were 32%, 30% and 38%, respectively. Two factors contributed to the high inappropriate rate. Many of these patients did not have "significant" coronary artery disease (although all had at least one stenosis > 50%) or they were treated with less than "optimal" medical therapy. While 96% of patients who met necessity criteria for revascularisation were appropriately referred for revascularisation, 4% were referred for continued medical therapy.
CONCLUSIONS—Using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method and the definitions agreed to by the expert panel, which may be considered conservative today, it was found that 19% of Swedish patients were referred for coronary revascularisation judged inappropriate. Since some cardiovascular procedures evolve rapidly, the proportion of patients referred for inappropriate indications today remains unknown. Nevertheless, physicians should actively identify those patients who will and will not benefit from coronary revascularisation and ensure that they are appropriately treated.


Keywords: coronary artery bypass graft surgery; angioplasty; quality of health care; health policy

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (127.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bengtson A., Herlitz J., Karlsson T., Brandrup-Wognsen G., Hjalmarson A. The appropriateness of performing coronary angiography and coronary artery revascularization in a Swedish population. JAMA. 1994 Apr 27;271(16):1260–1265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernstein S. J., Rigter H., Brorsson B., Hilborne L. H., Leape L. L., Meijler A. P., Scholma J. K., Nord A. S. Waiting for coronary revascularization: a comparison between New York State, The Netherlands and Sweden. Health Policy. 1997 Oct;42(1):15–27. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(97)00039-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carrié D., Elbaz M., Puel J., Fourcade J., Karouny E., Fournial G., Galinier M. Five-year outcome after coronary angioplasty versus bypass surgery in multivessel coronary artery disease: results from the French Monocentric Study. Circulation. 1997 Nov 4;96(9 Suppl):II–1-6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Detre K. M., Wright E., Murphy M. L., Takaro T. Observer agreement in evaluating coronary angiograms. Circulation. 1975 Dec;52(6):979–986. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.52.6.979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fisher L. D., Judkins M. P., Lesperance J., Cameron A., Swaye P., Ryan T., Maynard C., Bourassa M., Kennedy J. W., Gosselin A. Reproducibility of coronary arteriographic reading in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1982;8(6):565–575. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810080605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goy J. J., Eeckhout E., Burnand B., Vogt P., Stauffer J. C., Hurni M., Stumpe F., Ruchat P., Sadeghi H., Kappenberger L. Coronary angioplasty versus left internal mammary artery grafting for isolated proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis. Lancet. 1994 Jun 11;343(8911):1449–1453. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)92579-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hamm C. W., Reimers J., Ischinger T., Rupprecht H. J., Berger J., Bleifeld W. A randomized study of coronary angioplasty compared with bypass surgery in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary disease. German Angioplasty Bypass Surgery Investigation (GABI) N Engl J Med. 1994 Oct 20;331(16):1037–1043. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199410203311601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hilborne L. H., Leape L. L., Bernstein S. J., Park R. E., Fiske M. E., Kamberg C. J., Roth C. P., Brook R. H. The appropriateness of use of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in New York State. JAMA. 1993 Feb 10;269(6):761–765. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hueb W. A., Bellotti G., de Oliveira S. A., Arie S., de Albuquerque C. P., Jatene A. D., Pileggi F. The Medicine, Angioplasty or Surgery Study (MASS): a prospective, randomized trial of medical therapy, balloon angioplasty or bypass surgery for single proximal left anterior descending artery stenoses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Dec;26(7):1600–1605. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00384-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kahan J. P., Bernstein S. J., Leape L. L., Hilborne L. H., Park R. E., Parker L., Kamberg C. J., Brook R. H. Measuring the necessity of medical procedures. Med Care. 1994 Apr;32(4):357–365. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199404000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. King S. B., 3rd, Lembo N. J., Weintraub W. S., Kosinski A. S., Barnhart H. X., Kutner M. H., Alazraki N. P., Guyton R. A., Zhao X. Q. A randomized trial comparing coronary angioplasty with coronary bypass surgery. Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial (EAST) N Engl J Med. 1994 Oct 20;331(16):1044–1050. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199410203311602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kravitz R. L., Laouri M., Kahan J. P., Guzy P., Sherman T., Hilborne L., Brook R. H. Validity of criteria used for detecting underuse of coronary revascularization. JAMA. 1995 Aug 23;274(8):632–638. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kussmaul W. G., 3rd, Popp R. L., Norcini J. Accuracy and reproducibility of visual coronary stenosis estimates using information from multiple observers. Clin Cardiol. 1992 Mar;15(3):154–162. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960150305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Leape L. L., Hilborne L. H., Park R. E., Bernstein S. J., Kamberg C. J., Sherwood M., Brook R. H. The appropriateness of use of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in New York State. JAMA. 1993 Feb 10;269(6):753–760. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Naylor C. D., McGlynn E. A., Leape L. L., Pinfold S. P., Bernstein S. J., Hilborne L. H., Park R. E., Kahan J. P., Brook R. H. Coronary angiography and revascularization: defining procedural indications through formal group processes. The Canadian Revascularization Panel, the Canadian Coronary Angiography Panel. Can J Cardiol. 1994 Jan-Feb;10(1):41–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Park R. E., Fink A., Brook R. H., Chassin M. R., Kahn K. L., Merrick N. J., Kosecoff J., Solomon D. H. Physician ratings of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures. Am J Public Health. 1986 Jul;76(7):766–772. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.7.766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rigter H., Meijler A. P., McDonnell J., Scholma J. K., Bernstein S. J. Indications for coronary revascularisation: a Dutch perspective. Heart. 1997 Mar;77(3):211–218. doi: 10.1136/hrt.77.3.211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rodriguez A., Boullon F., Perez-Baliño N., Paviotti C., Liprandi M. I., Palacios I. F. Argentine randomized trial of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery in multivessel disease (ERACI): in-hospital results and 1-year follow-up. ERACI Group. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Oct;22(4):1060–1067. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90416-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Shekelle P. G., Kahan J. P., Bernstein S. J., Leape L. L., Kamberg C. J., Park R. E. The reproducibility of a method to identify the overuse and underuse of medical procedures. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jun 25;338(26):1888–1895. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199806253382607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Varnauskas E. Twelve-year follow-up of survival in the randomized European Coronary Surgery Study. N Engl J Med. 1988 Aug 11;319(6):332–337. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198808113190603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES