Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 1999 Jul;82(1):19–22. doi: 10.1136/hrt.82.1.19

Aortic root dilatation in young men with normally functioning bicuspid aortic valves

S Nistri 1, M Sorbo 1, M Marin 1, M Palisi 1, R Scognamiglio 1, G Thiene 1
PMCID: PMC1729087  PMID: 10377302

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To evaluate the dimensions of the aortic root in a selected population of young males with isolated normally functioning bicuspid aortic valve.
DESIGN AND SETTING—Echocardiographic and Doppler evaluation of conscripts with bicuspid aortic valve at the time of military pre-enrolment screening in two military hospitals.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS—66 consecutive young men with a normally functioning bicuspid aortic valve were studied to assess aortic size at four aortic levels: annulus, sinuses of Valsalva, supra-aortic ridge, and proximal ascending aorta; 70 consecutive normal young subjects, matched for age and body surface area, were used as controls.
RESULTS—In men with a bicuspid aortic valve, the diameter of the aortic root was significantly larger than in controls at the sinuses (3.16 (0.37) v 2.87 (0.31) cm, p < 0.001), at the supra-aortic ridge (2.64 (0.46) v 2.47 (0.28) cm, p = 0.01), and at the level of the proximal ascending aorta (3.12 (0.48) v 2.69 (0.28) cm, p < 0.001). The prevalence of aortic root dilatation was 7.5% at the annulus (5/66), 19.6% at the sinuses (13/66), 15% at the supra-aortic ridge (10/66), and 43.9% at the ascending aorta (29/66); 32 subjects (48%) had aortic root dimensions comparable with controls, while 34 (52%) had definitely abnormal aortic root dimensions.
CONCLUSIONS—Aortic root enlargement in people with a bicuspid aortic valve occurs independently of haemodynamic abnormalities, age, and body size. However, there appear to be different subgroups of young adults with bicuspid aortic valves, one of which is characterised by aortic dilatation, possibly caused by a congenital abnormality of the aortic wall.


Keywords: bicuspid aortic valve; aortic root dilatation

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (124.4 KB).

Figure 1  .

Figure 1  

Open in a new tab

Echocardiographic examinations in parasternal short axis view. Left panel: diastole; the presence of a raphé at 1 o'clock simulates a normal tricuspid aortic valve. Right panel: midsystole; it is clearly demonstrated that there are only two cusps.

Figure 2  .

Figure 2  

Open in a new tab

Diagrammatic representation of the aortic root with the sites of measurement: 1, aortic annulus; 2, sinuses of Valsalva; 3, supra-aortic ridge; 4, proximal ascending aorta. Ao, aorta; LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Basso C., Frescura C., Corrado D., Muriago M., Angelini A., Daliento L., Thiene G. Congenital heart disease and sudden death in the young. Hum Pathol. 1995 Oct;26(10):1065–1072. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(95)90267-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Braverman A. C. Bicuspid aortic valve and associated aortic wall abnormalities. Curr Opin Cardiol. 1996 Sep;11(5):501–503. doi: 10.1097/00001573-199609000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Edwards W. D., Leaf D. S., Edwards J. E. Dissecting aortic aneurysm associated with congenital bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation. 1978 May;57(5):1022–1025. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.57.5.1022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GORE I. Dissecting aneurysms of the aorta in persons under forty years of age. AMA Arch Pathol. 1953 Jan;55(1):1–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Giusti S., Cocco P., Thiene G. Valvola aortića biscuspide: una cardiopatia congenita "minore" a rischio di gravi complicanze. G Ital Cardiol. 1991 Feb;21(2):189–201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grundy S. M. Small LDL, atherogenic dyslipidemia, and the metabolic syndrome. Circulation. 1997 Jan 7;95(1):1–4. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hahn R. T., Roman M. J., Mogtader A. H., Devereux R. B. Association of aortic dilation with regurgitant, stenotic and functionally normal bicuspid aortic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Feb;19(2):283–288. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90479-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Larson E. W., Edwards W. D. Risk factors for aortic dissection: a necropsy study of 161 cases. Am J Cardiol. 1984 Mar 1;53(6):849–855. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90418-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lindsay J., Jr Coarctation of the aorta, bicuspid aortic valve and abnormal ascending aortic wall. Am J Cardiol. 1988 Jan 1;61(1):182–184. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)91327-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McKusick V. A. Association of congenital bicuspid aortic valve and erdheim's cystic medial necrosis. Lancet. 1972 May 6;1(7758):1026–1027. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)91211-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mills P., Leech G., Davies M., Leathan A. The natural history of a non-stenotic bicuspid aortic valve. Br Heart J. 1978 Sep;40(9):951–957. doi: 10.1136/hrt.40.9.951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Olson L. J., Subramanian R., Edwards W. D. Surgical pathology of pure aortic insufficiency: a study of 225 cases. Mayo Clin Proc. 1984 Dec;59(12):835–841. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)65618-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pachulski R. T., Weinberg A. L., Chan K. L. Aortic aneurysm in patients with functionally normal or minimally stenotic bicuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol. 1991 Apr 1;67(8):781–782. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90544-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Roberts C. S., Roberts W. C. Dissection of the aorta associated with congenital malformation of the aortic valve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Mar 1;17(3):712–716. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(10)80188-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Roberts W. C. Living with a congenitally bicuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol. 1989 Dec 1;64(19):1408–1409. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90598-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Roman M. J., Devereux R. B., Kramer-Fox R., O'Loughlin J. Two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in normal children and adults. Am J Cardiol. 1989 Sep 1;64(8):507–512. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90430-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Roman M. J., Rosen S. E., Kramer-Fox R., Devereux R. B. Prognostic significance of the pattern of aortic root dilation in the Marfan syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Nov 1;22(5):1470–1476. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90559-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schievink W. I., Mokri B. Familial aorto-cervicocephalic arterial dissections and congenitally bicuspid aortic valve. Stroke. 1995 Oct;26(10):1935–1940. doi: 10.1161/01.str.26.10.1935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Shores J., Berger K. R., Murphy E. A., Pyeritz R. E. Progression of aortic dilatation and the benefit of long-term beta-adrenergic blockade in Marfan's syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1994 May 12;330(19):1335–1341. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199405123301902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Vasan R. S., Larson M. G., Levy D. Determinants of echocardiographic aortic root size. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1995 Feb 1;91(3):734–740. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.3.734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES