Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 1999 Jul;82(1):11–14. doi: 10.1136/hrt.82.1.11

The relation between transaortic pressure difference and flow during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis

S Takeda 1, H Rimington 1, J Chambers 1
PMCID: PMC1729105  PMID: 10377300

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To investigate the relation between transaortic pressure difference and flow in patients with aortic stenosis.
METHODS—50 asymptomatic patients with all grades of aortic stenosis were studied using dobutamine stress echocardiography. Individual plots of mean pressure drop against flow were drawn. Comparisons were made between grades of aortic stenosis as defined by the continuity equation.
RESULTS—A significant linear relation between pressure difference and flow was found in 34 patients (68%). There was a significant curvilinear relation in four (8%), while no significant regression line could be fitted in 12 (24%). In the 34 patients with linear fits, the slopes (mean (SD)) were 0.08 (0.07) in mild, 0.10 (0.04) in moderate, and 0.22 (0.16) in severe aortic stenosis (p = 0.0055).
CONCLUSIONS—Transaortic pressure difference can be related directly to flow in many patients with all grades of aortic stenosis. However, there are individual differences in slope and intercept suggesting that resistance calculated at rest may not always be representative. Raw pressure drop/flow plots may be an alternative method of describing valve function.


Keywords: aortic stenosis; continuity equation; resistance; Doppler echocardiography

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (116.1 KB).

Figure 1  .

Figure 1  

Open in a new tab

Pressure drop/flow slopes in patients with mild, moderate, and severe aortic stenosis.

Figure 2  .

Figure 2  

Open in a new tab

Individual pressure drop/flow slopes in all patients with mild (A), moderate (B), and severe (C) aortic stenosis.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burwash I. G., Pearlman A. S., Kraft C. D., Miyake-Hull C., Healy N. L., Otto C. M. Flow dependence of measures of aortic stenosis severity during exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Nov 1;24(5):1342–1350. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90118-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burwash I. G., Thomas D. D., Sadahiro M., Pearlman A. S., Verrier E. D., Thomas R., Kraft C. D., Otto C. M. Dependence of Gorlin formula and continuity equation valve areas on transvalvular volume flow rate in valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation. 1994 Feb;89(2):827–835. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.2.827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cannon J. D., Jr, Zile M. R., Crawford F. A., Jr, Carabello B. A. Aortic valve resistance as an adjunct to the Gorlin formula in assessing the severity of aortic stenosis in symptomatic patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Dec;20(7):1517–1523. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90445-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cannon S. R., Richards K. L., Crawford M. Hydraulic estimation of stenotic orifice area: a correction of the Gorlin formula. Circulation. 1985 Jun;71(6):1170–1178. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.71.6.1170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Casale P. N., Palacios I. F., Abascal V. M., Harrell L., Davidoff R., Weyman A. E., Fifer M. A. Effects of dobutamine on Gorlin and continuity equation valve areas and valve resistance in valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1992 Nov 1;70(13):1175–1179. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90051-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ford L. E., Feldman T., Carroll J. D. Valve resistance. Circulation. 1994 Feb;89(2):893–895. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.2.893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GORLIN R., GORLIN S. G. Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I. Am Heart J. 1951 Jan;41(1):1–29. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(51)90002-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ho P. P., Pauls G. L., Lamberton D. F., Portnoff J. S., Pai R. G., Shah P. M. Doppler derived aortic valve resistance in aortic stenosis: its hemodynamic validation. J Heart Valve Dis. 1994 May;3(3):283–287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Isaaz K., Munoz L., Ports T., Schiller N. B. Demonstration of postvalvuloplasty hemodynamic improvement in aortic stenosis based on Doppler measurement of valvular resistance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Dec;18(7):1661–1670. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90500-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. RODRIGO F. A. Estimation of valve area and valvular resistance; a critical study of the physical basis of the methods employed. Am Heart J. 1953 Jan;45(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(53)90002-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sahn D. J., DeMaria A., Kisslo J., Weyman A. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation. 1978 Dec;58(6):1072–1083. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.58.6.1072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Segal J., Lerner D. J., Miller D. C., Mitchell R. S., Alderman E. A., Popp R. L. When should Doppler-determined valve area be better than the Gorlin formula?: Variation in hydraulic constants in low flow states. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Jun;9(6):1294–1305. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(87)80469-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Skjaerpe T., Hegrenaes L., Hatle L. Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation. 1985 Oct;72(4):810–818. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.72.4.810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sprigings D. C., Forfar J. C. How should we manage symptomatic aortic stenosis in the patient who is 80 or older? Br Heart J. 1995 Nov;74(5):481–484. doi: 10.1136/hrt.74.5.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ubago J. L., Figueroa A., Colman T., Ochoteco A., Duran C. G. Hemodynamic factors that affect calculated orifice areas in the mitral hancock xenograft valve. Circulation. 1980 Feb;61(2):388–394. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.61.2.388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Voelker W., Reul H., Nienhaus G., Stelzer T., Schmitz B., Steegers A., Karsch K. R. Comparison of valvular resistance, stroke work loss, and Gorlin valve area for quantification of aortic stenosis. An in vitro study in a pulsatile aortic flow model. Circulation. 1995 Feb 15;91(4):1196–1204. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.4.1196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES