Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 1999 Aug;82(2):143–148. doi: 10.1136/hrt.82.2.143

To operate or not on elderly patients with aortic stenosis: the decision and its consequences

B Bouma 1, R B A van den Brink 1, J H P van der Meulen 1, H Verheul 1, E Cheriex 1, H Hamer 1, E Dekker 1, K Lie 1, J Tijssen 1
PMCID: PMC1729124  PMID: 10409526

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To evaluate the application of guidelines in the decision making process leading to medical or surgical treatment for aortic stenosis in elderly patients.
DESIGN—Cohort analysis based on a prospective inclusive registry.
SETTING—205 consecutive patients (⩾ 70 years) with clinically relevant isolated aortic stenosis and without serious comorbidity, seen for the first time in the Doppler-echocardiographic laboratories of three university hospitals in the Netherlands.
RESULTS—The initial choice was surgery in 94 patients and medical treatment in 111. Only 59% of the patients who should have had valve replacement according to the practice guidelines were actually offered surgical treatment. These were mainly symptomatic patients under 80 years of age with a high gradient. Operative mortality (30 days) was only 2%. The three year survival was 80% in the surgical group (17 deaths among 94 patients) and 49% in the medical group (43/111). Multivariate analysis showed that only patients with a high baseline risk, mainly determined by impaired left ventricular function, had a significantly better three year survival with surgical treatment than with medical treatment.
CONCLUSIONS—In daily practice, elderly patients with clinically relevant symptomatic aortic stenosis are often denied surgical treatment. This study indicates that a surgical approach, especially where there is impaired systolic left ventricular function, is associated with better survival.


Keywords: aortic stenosis; elderly people; clinical decision making

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (99.9 KB).

Figure 1  .

Figure 1  

Open in a new tab

Survival in elderly patients with aortic stenosis stratified by treatment.

Figure 2  .

Figure 2  

Open in a new tab

Survival in patients with (A) low, (B) intermediate, and (C) high individual risk score, stratified by treatment.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bonow R. O., Carabello B., de Leon A. C., Jr, Edmunds L. H., Jr, Fedderly B. J., Freed M. D., Gaasch W. H., McKay C. R., Nishimura R. A., O'Gara P. T. Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease). Circulation. 1998 Nov 3;98(18):1949–1984. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.18.1949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chizner M. A., Pearle D. L., deLeon A. C., Jr The natural history of aortic stenosis in adults. Am Heart J. 1980 Apr;99(4):419–424. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(80)90375-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Connolly H. M., Oh J. K., Orszulak T. A., Osborn S. L., Roger V. L., Hodge D. O., Bailey K. R., Seward J. B., Tajik A. J. Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Prognostic indicators. Circulation. 1997 May 20;95(10):2395–2400. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.10.2395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Currie P. J., Seward J. B., Reeder G. S., Vlietstra R. E., Bresnahan D. R., Bresnahan J. F., Smith H. C., Hagler D. J., Tajik A. J. Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients. Circulation. 1985 Jun;71(6):1162–1169. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.71.6.1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Galan A., Zoghbi W. A., Quiñones M. A. Determination of severity of valvular aortic stenosis by Doppler echocardiography and relation of findings to clinical outcome and agreement with hemodynamic measurements determined at cardiac catheterization. Am J Cardiol. 1991 May 1;67(11):1007–1012. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90175-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Galloway A. C., Colvin S. B., Grossi E. A., Baumann F. G., Sabban Y. P., Esposito R., Ribakove G. H., Culliford A. T., Slater J. N., Glassman E. Ten-year experience with aortic valve replacement in 482 patients 70 years of age or older: operative risk and long-term results. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990 Jan;49(1):84–93. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(90)90360-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Greenfield S., Apolone G., McNeil B. J., Cleary P. D. The importance of co-existent disease in the occurrence of postoperative complications and one-year recovery in patients undergoing total hip replacement. Comorbidity and outcomes after hip replacement. Med Care. 1993 Feb;31(2):141–154. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199302000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kelly T. A., Rothbart R. M., Cooper C. M., Kaiser D. L., Smucker M. L., Gibson R. S. Comparison of outcome of asymptomatic to symptomatic patients older than 20 years of age with valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1988 Jan 1;61(1):123–130. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)91317-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lindroos M., Kupari M., Heikkilä J., Tilvis R. Prevalence of aortic valve abnormalities in the elderly: an echocardiographic study of a random population sample. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Apr;21(5):1220–1225. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90249-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Logeais Y., Langanay T., Roussin R., Leguerrier A., Rioux C., Chaperon J., de Place C., Mabo P., Pony J. C., Daubert J. C. Surgery for aortic stenosis in elderly patients. A study of surgical risk and predictive factors. Circulation. 1994 Dec;90(6):2891–2898. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.6.2891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lund O. Preoperative risk evaluation and stratification of long-term survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Reasons for earlier operative intervention. Circulation. 1990 Jul;82(1):124–139. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.82.1.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. O'Keefe J. H., Jr, Vlietstra R. E., Bailey K. R., Holmes D. R., Jr Natural history of candidates for balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Mayo Clin Proc. 1987 Nov;62(11):986–991. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)65068-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Olsson M., Granström L., Lindblom D., Rosenqvist M., Rydén L. Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians with aortic stenosis: a case-control study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Dec;20(7):1512–1516. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90444-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Otto C. M., Pearlman A. S. Doppler echocardiography in adults with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Diagnostic utility and cost-effectiveness. Arch Intern Med. 1988 Dec;148(12):2553–2560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pellikka P. A., Nishimura R. A., Bailey K. R., Tajik A. J. The natural history of adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Apr;15(5):1012–1017. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90234-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Perry G. J., Helmcke F., Nanda N. C., Byard C., Soto B. Evaluation of aortic insufficiency by Doppler color flow mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Apr;9(4):952–959. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(87)80254-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Quinones M. A., Pickering E., Alexander J. K. Percentage of shortening of the echocardiographic left ventricular dimension. Its use in determining ejection fraction and stroke volume. Chest. 1978 Jul;74(1):59–65. doi: 10.1378/chest.74.1.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. RANKIN J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II. Prognosis. Scott Med J. 1957 May;2(5):200–215. doi: 10.1177/003693305700200504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rankin S. L., Briffa T. G., Morton A. R., Hung J. A specific activity questionnaire to measure the functional capacity of cardiac patients. Am J Cardiol. 1996 Jun 1;77(14):1220–1223. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)89157-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rich S., Sheikh A., Gallastegui J., Kondos G. T., Mason T., Lam W. Determination of left ventricular ejection fraction by visual estimation during real-time two-dimensional echocardiography. Am Heart J. 1982 Sep;104(3):603–606. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(82)90233-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Robiolio P. A., Rigolin V. H., Hearne S. E., Baker W. A., Kisslo K. B., Pierce C. H., Bashore T. M., Harrison J. K. Left ventricular performance improves late after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis and reduced ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol. 1995 Sep 15;76(8):612–615. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80168-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Romhilt D. W., Estes E. H., Jr A point-score system for the ECG diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. Am Heart J. 1968 Jun;75(6):752–758. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(68)90035-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Selzer A. Changing aspects of the natural history of valvular aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1987 Jul 9;317(2):91–98. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198707093170206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Skjaerpe T., Hegrenaes L., Hatle L. Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation. 1985 Oct;72(4):810–818. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.72.4.810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sprigings D. C., Forfar J. C. How should we manage symptomatic aortic stenosis in the patient who is 80 or older? Br Heart J. 1995 Nov;74(5):481–484. doi: 10.1136/hrt.74.5.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Thibault G. E. Too old for what? N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 1;328(13):946–950. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304013281309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Verheul H. A., van den Brink R. B., Bouma B. J., Hoedemaker G., Moulijn A. C., Dekker E., Bossuyt P., Dunning A. J. Analysis of risk factors for excess mortality after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Nov 1;26(5):1280–1286. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00303-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wong J. B., Salem D. N., Pauker S. G. You're never too old. N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 1;328(13):971–975. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304013281319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES