Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 2001 Jan;85(1):44–47. doi: 10.1136/heart.85.1.44

Slow pathway modification for atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia: fast junctional tachycardia predicts adverse prognosis

K Lipscomb 1, A Zaidi 1, A Fitzpatrick 1, D LEFROY 1
PMCID: PMC1729591  PMID: 11119460

Abstract

D LEFROY Deputy Editor

OBJECTIVE—To examine the cycle length of the junctional tachycardia often seen during successful slow pathway ablation for atrioventricular (AV) node re-entrant tachycardia, to determine whether shorter cycle lengths predict imminent atrioventricular block.
DESIGN—Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing slow pathway modification. Intracardiac recordings were analysed after digital storage to determine the development of junctional tachycardia, its duration and maximum, minimum, and mean cycle length, occurrence of heart block, persistent slow pathway conduction, or later confirmed recurrence of AV node re-entrant tachycardia.
SETTING—Regional cardiac centre.
PATIENTS—136 consecutive patients undergoing electrophysiological study found to have typical "slow-fast" AV node re-entrant tachycardia and subject to 137 slow pathway modification procedures.
RESULTS—During successful temperature feedback controlled radiofrequency energy application, junctional tachycardia developed in 133 of 137 procedures. During ablation, 10 patients had evidence of AV block (first degree in seven patients and third degree in three), and 17 others had retrograde junctional atrial (JA) block. In these 27 patients, the junctional tachycardia was rapid, with a minimum (SD) cycle length 291 (47) ms. Conduction recovered quickly in all but two patients, one of whom required permanent pacing. Junctional tachycardia with normal AV and JA conduction in the other 111 patients was of a significantly slower minimum cycle length (537 (123) ms; p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS—Fast junctional tachycardia with cycle lengths under 350 ms seen during slow pathway modification is a predictor of conduction block, suggesting proximity to the compact node. Radiofrequency energy application should be terminated immediately to prevent development of AV block. An "auto cut off" facility for cycle lengths shorter than 350 ms could be built into radiofrequency ablation systems to increase safety.


Keywords: junctional tachycardia; atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia; slow pathway modification

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (86.3 KB).

Figure 1  .

Figure 1  

Open in a new tab

Position of the "fast" and "slow" electrical pathways in the region of the AV node. CS, coronary sinus catheter; FP, fast pathway; RA, right atrial catheter; RAO, right anterior oblique projection; RV right ventricular catheter; SP, slow pathway.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boyle N. G., Anselme F., Monahan K., Papageorgiou P., Zardini M., Zebede J., Josephson M. E. Origin of junctional rhythm during radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in patients without structural heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 1997 Sep 1;80(5):575–580. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00424-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen S. A., Chiang C. E., Tai C. T., Lee S. H., Chiou C. W., Ueng K. C., Wen Z. C., Chang M. S. Transient complete atrioventricular block during radiofrequency ablation of slow pathway for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Am J Cardiol. 1996 Jun 15;77(15):1367–1370. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00209-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Epstein M. R., Saul J. P., Fishberger S. B., Triedman J. K., Walsh E. P. Spontaneous accelerated junctional rhythm: an unusual but useful observation prior to radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia in young patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Jun;20(6):1654–1661. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb03535.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hindricks G. Incidence of complete atrioventricular block following attempted radiofrequency catheter modification of the atrioventricular node in 880 patients. Results of the Multicenter European Radiofrequency Survey (MERFS) The Working Group on Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 1996 Jan;17(1):82–88. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jackman W. M., Beckman K. J., McClelland J. H., Wang X., Friday K. J., Roman C. A., Moulton K. P., Twidale N., Hazlitt H. A., Prior M. I. Treatment of supraventricular tachycardia due to atrioventricular nodal reentry, by radiofrequency catheter ablation of slow-pathway conduction. N Engl J Med. 1992 Jul 30;327(5):313–318. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199207303270504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jazayeri M. R., Akhtar M. Electrophysiological behavior of atrioventricular node after selective fast or slow pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1993 Mar;16(3 Pt 2):623–628. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1993.tb01634.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jazayeri M. R., Hempe S. L., Sra J. S., Dhala A. A., Blanck Z., Deshpande S. S., Avitall B., Krum D. P., Gilbert C. J., Akhtar M. Selective transcatheter ablation of the fast and slow pathways using radiofrequency energy in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Circulation. 1992 Apr;85(4):1318–1328. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.85.4.1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jentzer J. H., Goyal R., Williamson B. D., Man K. C., Niebauer M., Daoud E., Strickberger S. A., Hummel J. D., Morady F. Analysis of junctional ectopy during radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Circulation. 1994 Dec;90(6):2820–2826. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.6.2820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kay G. N., Epstein A. E., Dailey S. M., Plumb V. J. Selective radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway for the treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Evidence for involvement of perinodal myocardium within the reentrant circuit. Circulation. 1992 May;85(5):1675–1688. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.85.5.1675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Manolis A. S., Wang P. J., Estes N. A., 3rd Radiofrequency ablation of slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Do arrhythmia recurrences correlate with persistent slow pathway conduction or site of successful ablation? Circulation. 1994 Dec;90(6):2815–2819. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.6.2815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Prystowsky E. N. Atrioventricular node reentry: physiology and radiofrequency ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Feb;20(2 Pt 2):552–571. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb06210.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schumacher B., Tebbenjohanns J., Pfeiffer D., Jung W., Lüderitz B. Junktionale Arrhythmien bei der Radiofrequenzmodifikation des atrioventrikulären Knotens. Z Kardiol. 1995 Dec;84(12):977–985. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Thakur R. K., Klein G. J., Yee R., Stites H. W. Junctional tachycardia: a useful marker during radiofrequency ablation for atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Nov 15;22(6):1706–1710. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90600-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wathen M., Natale A., Wolfe K., Yee R., Newman D., Klein G. An anatomically guided approach to atrioventricular node slow pathway ablation. Am J Cardiol. 1992 Oct 1;70(9):886–889. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90732-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Yeung-Lai-Wah J. A., Alison J. F., Lonergan L., Mohama R., Leather R., Kerr C. R. High success rate of atrioventricular node ablation with radiofrequency energy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Dec;18(7):1753–1758. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90516-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES