Skip to main content
PMC home page
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 2001 Apr;85(4):375–379. doi: 10.1136/heart.85.4.375

How different from pacemaker patients are recipients of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators with respect to psychosocial adaptation, affective disorders, and quality of life?

F Duru 1, S Buchi 1, R Klaghofer 1, H Mattmann 1, T Sensky 1, C Buddeberg 1, R Candinas 1
PMCID: PMC1729685  PMID: 11250956

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To assess differences in psychosocial adaptation, quality of life, and incidence of affective disorders between patients with pacemakers and those with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs).
DESIGN—Patients aged 40-70 years who underwent a first pectoral implantation of a pacemaker or an ICD system were studied. All subjects were asked to complete the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HAD), the short form general health survey (SF-36), and a specially designed device related questionnaire. Data analysis was performed for three patient groups: pacemaker (n = 76), ICD patients who received therapeutic shocks (n = 45), and ICD patients who did not receive shocks (n = 31).
RESULTS—There were no differences between the three patient groups in HAD scores or in any of the SF-36 subscales or summary ratings. Probable depressive disorder (depression score > 10) was observed in 5.2%, 6.5%, and 6.6%, and probable anxiety disorder (anxiety score > 10) in 13.1%, 9.7%, 13.3% of the pacemaker, non-shocked ICD, and shocked ICD patients, respectively. There were no sex differences. However, patients in the shocked ICD group were more likely than those in the other groups to report limitations in their leisure activities, to perceive their device as a "life extender," and to admit anxiety about battery depletion and technical problems. Forty per cent of shocked ICD patients would be interested in joining a support group.
CONCLUSIONS—Despite having distinctly different medical histories and treatments, patients with pacemakers and ICDs responded similarly to validated tools of health status assessment. ICD patients who had received shocks perceived their device as prolonging their life and had greater anxiety about technical problems. Their endorsement of the potential benefits of a support group warrants further investigation.


Keywords: pacemaker; implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; affective disorder; quality of life

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (113.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aydemir O., Ozmen E., Küey L., Kültür S., Yeşil M., Postaci N., Bayata S. Psychiatric morbidity and depressive symptomatology in patients with permanent pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Jun;20(6):1628–1632. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb03531.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Deharo J. C., Badier M., Thirion X., Ritter P., Provenier F., Graux P., Guillot C., Mugica J., Jordaens L., Djiane P. A randomized, single-blind crossover comparison of the effects of chronic DDD and dual sensor VVIR pacing mode on quality-of-life and cardiopulmonary performance in complete heart block. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996 Sep;19(9):1320–1326. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb04210.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dougherty C. M. Psychological reactions and family adjustment in shock versus no shock groups after implantation of internal cardioverter defibrillator. Heart Lung. 1995 Jul-Aug;24(4):281–291. doi: 10.1016/s0147-9563(05)80071-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dunbar S. B., Warner C. D., Purcell J. A. Internal cardioverter defibrillator device discharge: experiences of patients and family members. Heart Lung. 1993 Nov-Dec;22(6):494–501. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hegel M. T., Griegel L. E., Black C., Goulden L., Ozahowski T. Anxiety and depression in patients receiving implanted cardioverter-defibrillators: a longitudinal investigation. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1997;27(1):57–69. doi: 10.2190/1G9V-EQMD-MTLQ-E0BW. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Heller S. S., Ormont M. A., Lidagoster L., Sciacca R. R., Steinberg S. Psychosocial outcome after ICD implantation: a current perspective. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Jun;21(6):1207–1215. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00179.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Herrmann C., von zur Mühen F., Schaumann A., Buss U., Kemper S., Wantzen C., Gonska B. D. Standardized assessment of psychological well-being and quality-of-life in patients with implanted defibrillators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Jan;20(1 Pt 1):95–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb04817.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Isner J. M. Jeffrey Michael Isner, MD: a conversation with the editor. Interview by William Clifford Roberts. Am J Cardiol. 1999 Jan 1;83(1):68–88. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00809-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lamas G. A., Orav E. J., Stambler B. S., Ellenbogen K. A., Sgarbossa E. B., Huang S. K., Marinchak R. A., Estes N. A., 3rd, Mitchell G. F., Lieberman E. H. Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing. Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1998 Apr 16;338(16):1097–1104. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199804163381602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Linde-Edelstam C., Nordlander R., Undén A. L., Orth-Gomér K., Rydén L. Quality-of-life in patients treated with atrioventricular synchronous pacing compared to rate modulated ventricular pacing: a long-term, double-blind, crossover study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992 Oct;15(10 Pt 1):1467–1476. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb02920.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lukl J., Doupal V., Heinc P. Quality-of-life during DDD and dual sensor VVIR pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994 Nov;17(11 Pt 2):1844–1848. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb03760.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lüderitz B., Jung W., Deister A., Manz M. Patient acceptance of implantable cardioverter defibrillator devices: changing attitudes. Am Heart J. 1994 Apr;127(4 Pt 2):1179–1184. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90107-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lüderitz B., Jung W., Deister A., Marneros A., Manz M. Patient acceptance of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator in ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1993 Sep;16(9):1815–1821. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1993.tb01816.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Oto M. A., Müderrisoglu H., Ozin M. B., Korkmaz M. E., Karamehmetoglu A., Oram A., Oram E., Ugurlu S. Quality of life in patients with rate responsive pacemakers: a randomized, cross-over study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 May;14(5 Pt 1):800–806. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb04110.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pycha C., Calabrese J. R., Gulledge A. D., Maloney J. D. Patient and spouse acceptance and adaptation to implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Cleve Clin J Med. 1990 Jul-Aug;57(5):441–444. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.57.5.441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pycha C., Gulledge A. D., Hutzler J., Kadri N., Maloney J. Psychological responses to the implantable defibrillator: preliminary observations. Psychosomatics. 1986 Dec;27(12):841–845. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3182(86)72589-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zigmond A. S., Snaith R. P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES