Abstract
Objective: To describe the epidemiology of work related injury in a group of small scale, independent commercial fishers.
Design: Cross sectional survey (baseline instrument of a prospective cohort study).
Setting and subjects: Commercial fishers in eastern North Carolina.
Results: A cohort of 219 commercial fishers was established and 215 subjects completed an injury questionnaire. The main types of fishing conducted by the cohort were finfishing (159/215) and crabbing (154/215). Of the 215 fishers, 83 reported that they had suffered an injury event in the previous 12 months, a retrospective recall incidence proportion of 38.6 per 100 workers (95% confidence interval 32.1 to 45.1). The 83 injury events resulted in 94 injuries; 47% were penetrating wounds and 24% were strains/sprains. Half of injuries were to the hand/wrist/digits and 13% were to the back. Of the penetrating wounds, 87% were to the hand/wrist/digits, 32% became infected, and 80% were caused by contact with finfish, shellfish, or other marine animal. Of the strains/sprains, 48% were to the back and 26% were to the shoulder. Seventy percent of strains/sprains were caused by moving heavy objects, mainly either while hauling in nets, pots, or lines or loading/unloading the boat.
Conclusion: In this group of small scale, independent fishers, the most common reported injuries were penetrating wounds to the hand/wrist/digits from marine animals and strains/sprains to the back while moving heavy objects.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (78.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Harel Y., Overpeck M. D., Jones D. H., Scheidt P. C., Bijur P. E., Trumble A. C., Anderson J. The effects of recall on estimating annual nonfatal injury rates for children and adolescents. Am J Public Health. 1994 Apr;84(4):599–605. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.4.599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jensen O. C. Work related injuries in Danish fishermen. Occup Med (Lond) 1996 Dec;46(6):414–420. doi: 10.1093/occmed/46.6.414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laing R. M., Burridge J. D., Marshall S. W., Keast D. E. Hand and lower arm injuries among New Zealand meat workers and use of protective clothing. N Z Med J. 1997 Sep 26;110(1052):358–361. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McDonald Mary Anne, Loomis Dana, Kucera Kristen L., Lipscomb Hester J. Use of qualitative methods to map job tasks and exposures to occupational hazards for commercial fishermen. Am J Ind Med. 2004 Jul;46(1):23–31. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mock C., Acheampong F., Adjei S., Koepsell T. The effect of recall on estimation of incidence rates for injury in Ghana. Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Aug;28(4):750–755. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.4.750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moe C. L., Turf E., Oldach D., Bell P., Hutton S., Savitz D., Koltai D., Turf M., Ingsrisawang L., Hart R. Cohort studies of health effects among people exposed to estuarine waters: North Carolina, Virginia, and Maryland. Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Oct;109 (Suppl 5):781–786. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109s5781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Norrish A. E., Cryer P. C. Work related injury in New Zealand commercial fishermen. Br J Ind Med. 1990 Nov;47(11):726–732. doi: 10.1136/oem.47.11.726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schnitzer P. G., Landen D. D., Russell J. C. Occupational injury deaths in Alaska's fishing industry, 1980 through 1988. Am J Public Health. 1993 May;83(5):685–688. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.5.685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas T. K., Lincoln J. M., Husberg B. J., Conway G. A. Is it safe on deck? Fatal and non-fatal workplace injuries among Alaskan commercial fishermen. Am J Ind Med. 2001 Dec;40(6):693–702. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Törner M., Almström C., Karlsson R., Kadefors R. Working on a moving surface--a biomechanical analysis of musculo-skeletal load due to ship motions in combination with work. Ergonomics. 1994 Feb;37(2):345–362. doi: 10.1080/00140139408963651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]