Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Injury Prevention logoLink to Injury Prevention
. 2004 Oct;10(5):314–319. doi: 10.1136/ip.2004.005850

Lost working days, productivity, and restraint use among occupants of motor vehicles that crashed in the United States

B Ebel 1, C Mack 1, P Diehr 1, F Rivara 1
PMCID: PMC1730133  PMID: 15470014

Abstract

Background: In 2001, 6.3 million passengers were involved in motor vehicle crashes. This study aimed to determine the number of work days lost as a result of motor vehicle crashes and factors that influenced people's return to work.

Methods: This was a retrospective, population based cohort study of occupants in motor vehicles involved in crashes from the 1993–2001 Crashworthiness Data System produced by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The sample population of people aged 18–65 years included two groups: occupants who survived and were working before the crash and occupants who were injured fatally and were estimated to have been working before the crash. Multivariate linear regression was used to analyze the impact of restraint use and injury type on return to work.

Results: Overall, 30.1% of occupants of vehicles that crashed missed one or more days of work. A crash resulted in a mean 28.0 (95% confidence interval 15.8 to 40.1) days lost from work, including losses associated with fatalities. The 2.1 million working occupants of vehicles that crashed in 2001 lost a total of 60 million days of work, resulting in annual productivity losses of over $7.5 billion (2964 to 12 075). Unrestrained vehicle occupants accounted for $5.6 billion in lost productivity.

Conclusions: Motor vehicle crashes result in large and potentially preventable productive losses that are mostly attributable to fatal injuries.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (74.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baldry Currens J. A. Evaluation of disability and handicap following injury. Injury. 2000 Mar;31(2):99–106. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(99)00246-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baldry Currens J. A. Evaluation of disability and handicap following injury. Injury. 2000 Mar;31(2):99–106. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(99)00246-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Campbell B. J. Safety belt injury reduction related to crash severity and front seated position. J Trauma. 1987 Jul;27(7):733–739. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198707000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cooper P. J. Estimating overinvolvement of seat belt nonwearers in crashes and the effect of lap/shoulder restraint use on different crash severity consequences. Accid Anal Prev. 1994 Apr;26(2):263–275. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(94)90096-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cummings Peter, Wells James D., Rivara Frederick P. Estimating seat belt effectiveness using matched-pair cohort methods. Accid Anal Prev. 2003 Jan;35(1):143–149. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(01)00087-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Engels Jean Mundahl, Diehr Paula. Imputation of missing longitudinal data: a comparison of methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Oct;56(10):968–976. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00170-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Greenland S., Finkle W. D. A critical look at methods for handling missing covariates in epidemiologic regression analyses. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Dec 15;142(12):1255–1264. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lumley Thomas, Diehr Paula, Emerson Scott, Chen Lu. The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets. Annu Rev Public Health. 2001 Oct 25;23:151–169. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MacKenzie E. J., Cushing B. M., Jurkovich G. J., Morris J. A., Jr, Burgess A. R., deLateur B. J., McAndrew M. P., Swiontkowski M. F. Physical impairment and functional outcomes six months after severe lower extremity fractures. J Trauma. 1993 Apr;34(4):528–539. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199304000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. MacKenzie E. J., Morris J. A., Jr, Jurkovich G. J., Yasui Y., Cushing B. M., Burgess A. R., DeLateur B. J., McAndrew M. P., Swiontkowski M. F. Return to work following injury: the role of economic, social, and job-related factors. Am J Public Health. 1998 Nov;88(11):1630–1637. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.11.1630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MacKenzie E. J., Shapiro S., Smith R. T., Siegel J. H., Moody M., Pitt A. Factors influencing return to work following hospitalization for traumatic injury. Am J Public Health. 1987 Mar;77(3):329–334. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.3.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Marine W. M., Kerwin E. M., Moore E. E., Lezotte D. C., Baron A. E., Grosso M. A. Mandatory seatbelts: epidemiologic, financial, and medical rationale from the Colorado matched pairs study. J Trauma. 1994 Jan;36(1):96–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mason Suzanne, Wardrope Jim, Turpin Graham, Rowlands Alison. Outcomes after injury: a comparison of workplace and nonworkplace injury. J Trauma. 2002 Jul;53(1):98–103. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200207000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McGee D. L., Rhodes P. Estimating trends in the effectiveness of seat belts in saving lives, 1975-1985. Stat Med. 1989 Mar;8(3):379–385. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780080319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Miller T. R. Costs and functional consequences of U.S. roadway crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 1993 Oct;25(5):593–607. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(93)90011-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mock C., MacKenzie E., Jurkovich G., Burgess A., Cushing B., deLateur B., McAndrew M., Morris J., Swiontkowski M. Determinants of disability after lower extremity fracture. J Trauma. 2000 Dec;49(6):1002–1011. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200012000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Newman R. J. A prospective evaluation of the protective effect of car seatbelts. J Trauma. 1986 Jun;26(6):561–564. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198606000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Orsay E. M., Dunne M., Turnbull T. L., Barrett J. A., Langenberg P., Orsay C. P. Prospective study of the effect of safety belts in motor vehicle crashes. Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Mar;19(3):258–261. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82040-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rivara F. P., Koepsell T. D., Grossman D. C., Mock C. Effectiveness of automatic shoulder belt systems in motor vehicle crashes. JAMA. 2000 Jun 7;283(21):2826–2828. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.21.2826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ruffolo C. F., Friedland J. F., Dawson D. R., Colantonio A., Lindsay P. H. Mild traumatic brain injury from motor vehicle accidents: factors associated with return to work. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Apr;80(4):392–398. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90275-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wagner Amy K., Hammond Flora M., Sasser Howell C., Wiercisiewski David. Return to productive activity after traumatic brain injury: relationship with measures of disability, handicap, and community integration. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Jan;83(1):107–114. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.27470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. van der Sluis C. K., Eisma W. H., Groothoff J. W., ten Duis H. J. Long-term physical, psychological and social consequences of severe injuries. Injury. 1998 May;29(4):281–285. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(97)00199-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Injury Prevention are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES