Abstract
Objective: To compare availability, urban price, and affordability of child/family safety devices between 18 economically diverse countries.
Design: Descriptive: urban price surveys by local safety organisations or shoppers.
Setting: Retail stores and internet vendors.
Main outcome measures: Prices expressed in US dollars, and affordability measured by hours of factory work needed to buy a child safety seat, a belt-positioning booster seat, a child bicycle helmet, and a smoke alarm.
Results: Prices of child and family safety devices varied widely between countries but the variation for child safety seats and bicycle helmets did not relate strongly to country income. Safety devices were expensive, often prohibitively so, in lower income countries. Far more hours of factory work were required to earn a child safety device in lower income than middle income, and middle income than higher income, countries. A bicycle helmet, for example, cost 10 hours of factory work in lower income countries but less than an hour in higher income countries. Smoke alarms and booster seats were not available in many lower income countries.
Conclusions: Bicycles and two-axle motor vehicles were numerous in lower and middle income countries, but corresponding child safety devices were often unaffordable and sometimes not readily available. The apparent market distortions and their causes merit investigation. Advocacy, social marketing, local device production, lowering of tariffs, and mandatory use legislation might stimulate market growth. Arguably, a moral obligation exists to offer subsidies that give all children a fair chance of surviving to adulthood.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (71.7 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Conrad P., Bradshaw Y. S., Lamsudin R., Kasniyah N., Costello C. Helmets, injuries and cultural definitions: motorcycle injury in urban Indonesia. Accid Anal Prev. 1996 Mar;28(2):193–200. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(95)00056-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Durbin Dennis R., Elliott Michael R., Winston Flaura K. Belt-positioning booster seats and reduction in risk of injury among children in vehicle crashes. JAMA. 2003 Jun 4;289(21):2835–2840. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.21.2835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ichikawa Masao, Chadbunchachai Witaya, Marui Eiji. Effect of the helmet act for motorcyclists in Thailand. Accid Anal Prev. 2003 Mar;35(2):183–189. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(01)00102-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller T. R., Levy D. T. Cost outcome analysis in injury prevention and control: a primer on methods. Inj Prev. 1997 Dec;3(4):288–293. doi: 10.1136/ip.3.4.288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller T. R., Levy D. T. Cost-outcome analysis in injury prevention and control: eighty-four recent estimates for the United States. Med Care. 2000 Jun;38(6):562–582. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200006000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scuffham P., Alsop J., Cryer C., Langley J. D. Head injuries to bicyclists and the New Zealand bicycle helmet law. Accid Anal Prev. 2000 Jul;32(4):565–573. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00081-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson D. C., Rivara F. P., Thompson R. S. Effectiveness of bicycle safety helmets in preventing head injuries. A case-control study. JAMA. 1996 Dec 25;276(24):1968–1973. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zaza S., Sleet D. A., Thompson R. S., Sosin D. M., Bolen J. C., Task Force on Community Preventive Services Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to increase use of child safety seats. Am J Prev Med. 2001 Nov;21(4 Suppl):31–47. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00377-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]