Abstract
Setting: Parents of children 12 years old and under whose child had made at least one visit to a study clinic in the years 2000–2003.
Methods: As part of a randomized controlled trial to improve patient provider communication and preventive practices, parents' responses to telephone interview were compared with observations of safety practices during a home visit. Home visits were completed within nine weeks of the telephone interview. Parents were not told that the visit was part of a validation study and home visit observers were unaware of the interview responses. The authors calculated sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values, and their corresponding confidence intervals.
Results: Sensitivity (0.78 to 0.98) and positive predictive values (0.75 to 1.00) were high for all items. Specificities and negative predictive values were more variable and the highest estimates (specificity 0.95 to 1.00, negative predictive value 0.95 to 0.97) were for car seat types.
Conclusions: The results suggest that parent self report practice of certain injury prevention behaviors (owning a car seat, hot water temperatures) is reliable, whereas self reports on other practices (working smoke detectors, properly fitting bike helmets) may be overstated.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (64.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Chen L-H, Gielen A. C., McDonald E. M. Validity of self reported home safety practices. Inj Prev. 2003 Mar;9(1):73–75. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.1.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ching R. P., Thompson D. C., Thompson R. S., Thomas D. J., Chilcott W. C., Rivara F. P. Damage to bicycle helmets involved with crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 1997 Sep;29(5):555–562. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(97)00008-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clamp M., Kendrick D. A randomised controlled trial of general practitioner safety advice for families with children under 5 years. BMJ. 1998 May 23;316(7144):1576–1579. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7144.1576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelly B., Sein C., McCarthy P. L. Safety education in a pediatric primary care setting. Pediatrics. 1987 May;79(5):818–824. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kendrick D., Hapgood R., Marsh P. Do safety practices differ between responders and non-responders to a safety questionnaire? Inj Prev. 2001 Jun;7(2):100–103. doi: 10.1136/ip.7.2.100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morrongiello Barbara A., Kiriakou Sophie. Mothers' home-safety practices for preventing six types of childhood injuries: what do they do, and why? J Pediatr Psychol. 2004 Jun;29(4):285–297. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsh030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nelson D. E. Validity of self reported data on injury prevention behavior: lessons from observational and self reported surveys of safety belt use in the US. Inj Prev. 1996 Mar;2(1):67–69. doi: 10.1136/ip.2.1.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parada M. A., Cohn L. D., Gonzalez E., Byrd T., Cortes M. The validity of self-reported seatbelt use: Hispanic and non-Hispanic drivers in El Paso. Accid Anal Prev. 2001 Jan;33(1):139–143. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(00)00012-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rivara Frederick P. Modification of the home environment for the reduction of injuries. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004 Jun;158(6):513–513. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.158.6.513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robertson L. S. The validity of self-reported behavioral risk factors: seatbelt and alcohol use. J Trauma. 1992 Jan;32(1):58–59. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199201000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scheidt P. C., Harel Y., Trumble A. C., Jones D. H., Overpeck M. D., Bijur P. E. The epidemiology of nonfatal injuries among US children and youth. Am J Public Health. 1995 Jul;85(7):932–938. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.7.932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Watson M., Kendrick D., Coupland C. Validation of a home safety questionnaire used in a randomised controlled trial. Inj Prev. 2003 Jun;9(2):180–183. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.2.180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]