Skip to main content
PMC home page
Injury Prevention logoLink to Injury Prevention
. 1999 Jun;5(2):136–141. doi: 10.1136/ip.5.2.136

Comparing pediatric intentional injury surveillance data with data from publicly available sources: consequences for a public health response to violence

D Stone 1, S Kharasch 1, C Perron 1, K Wilson 1, B Jacklin 1, R Sege 1
PMCID: PMC1730497  PMID: 10385835

Abstract

Objective—A hospital based intentional injury surveillance system for youth (aged 3–18) was compared with other publicly available sources of information on youth violence. The comparison addressed whether locally conducted surveillance provides data that are sufficiently more complete, detailed, and timely that clinicians and public health practitioners interested in youth violence prevention would find surveillance worth conducting.

Setting—The Boston Emergency Department Surveillance (BEDS) project was conducted at Boston Medical Center and the Children's Hospital, Boston.

Method—MEDLINE and other databases were searched for data sources that report separate data for youth and data on intentional injury. Sources that met these criteria (one national and three local) were then compared with BEDS data. Comparisons were made in the following categories: age, gender, victim-offender relationship, injury circumstance, geographic location, weapon rates, and violent injury rates.

Results—Of 14 sources dealing with violence, only four met inclusion criteria. Each source provided useful breakdowns for age and gender; however, only the BEDS data were able to demonstrate that 32.6% of intentional injuries occurred among youth aged 12 and under. Comparison data sources provided less detail regarding the victim-offender relationship, injury circumstance, and weapon use. Comparison of violent injury rates showed the difficulties for practitioners estimating intentional injury from sources based on arrest data, crime victim data, or weapon related injury.

Conclusions—Comparison suggests that surveillance is more complete, detailed, and timely than publicly available sources of data. Clinicians and public health practitioners should consider developing similar systems.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (120.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Agran P. F., Winn D. G., Anderson C. L. Surveillance of pediatric injury hospitalizations in Southern California. Inj Prev. 1995 Dec;1(4):234–237. doi: 10.1136/ip.1.4.234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DuRant R. H., Kahn J., Beckford P. H., Woods E. R. The association of weapon carrying and fighting on school property and other health risk and problem behaviors among high school students. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997 Apr;151(4):360–366. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1997.02170410034004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Finkelhor D., Asdigian N. L. Risk factors for youth victimization: beyond a lifestyles/routine activities theory approach. Violence Vict. 1996 Spring;11(1):3–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Garmezy N. Children in poverty: resilience despite risk. Psychiatry. 1993 Feb;56(1):127–136. doi: 10.1080/00332747.1993.11024627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Guyer B., Lescohier I., Gallagher S. S., Hausman A., Azzara C. V. Intentional injuries among children and adolescents in Massachusetts. N Engl J Med. 1989 Dec 7;321(23):1584–1589. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198912073212306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hartzog T. H., Timerding B. L., Alson R. L. Pediatric trauma: enabling factors, social situations, and outcome. Acad Emerg Med. 1996 Mar;3(3):213–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03423.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hausman A. J., Spivak H., Prothrow-Stith D. Adolescents' knowledge and attitudes about and experience with violence. J Adolesc Health. 1994 Jul;15(5):400–406. doi: 10.1016/1054-139x(94)90264-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kraus J. F., Hooten E. G., Brown K. A., Peek-Asa C., Heye C., McArthur D. L. Child pedestrian and bicyclist injuries: results of community surveillance and a case-control study. Inj Prev. 1996 Sep;2(3):212–218. doi: 10.1136/ip.2.3.212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Li G., Baker S. P., DiScala C., Fowler C., Ling J., Kelen G. D. Factors associated with the intent of firearm-related injuries in pediatric trauma patients. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996 Nov;150(11):1160–1165. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170360050008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lyons R. A., Lo S. V., Heaven M., Littlepage B. N. Injury surveillance in children--usefulness of a centralised database of accident and emergency attendances. Inj Prev. 1995 Sep;1(3):173–176. doi: 10.1136/ip.1.3.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Saner H., Ellickson P. Concurrent risk factors for adolescent violence. J Adolesc Health. 1996 Aug;19(2):94–103. doi: 10.1016/1054-139X(96)00131-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sege R., Stigol L. C., Perry C., Goldstein R., Spivak H. Intentional injury surveillance in a primary care pediatric setting. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996 Mar;150(3):277–283. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170280047008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Weiss H. B. Limitations of child injury data from the CPSC's National Electronic Injury Surveillance System: the case of baby walker related data. Inj Prev. 1996 Mar;2(1):61–66. doi: 10.1136/ip.2.1.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zwi K. J., Zwi A. B., Smettanikov E., Söderlund N., Logan S. Patterns of injury in children and adolescents presenting to a South African township health centre. Inj Prev. 1995 Mar;1(1):26–30. doi: 10.1136/ip.1.1.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Injury Prevention are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES