Abstract
Objective—To determine the sensitivity and representativeness of the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program (CHIRPP).
Setting—The study was conducted in the Ottawa-Carleton region of Ontario, Canada (June through August, 1992).
Methods—Surveillance system sensitivity was estimated by dividing the number of injured children attending the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (the only CHIRPP center in Ottawa-Carleton) by the total number of emergency department attended childhood injuries in the region. CHIRPP representativeness was assessed by comparing the injuries missed by the system with those captured on social, demographic, and clinical factors.
Results—Sensitivity was 65% (1552/2386). Missed and captured injuries were similar on sex, day, time of presentation, injury intent, and delay before presentation. Children older than 14 years, however, were more likely to be missed by the system; adjusted odds ratio 3.52 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.87 to 4.32). Conversely, children admitted to hospital were less likely to be missed; adjusted odds ratio 0.43 (95% CI 0.23 to 0.80).
Conclusion—Given the systematic errors in capture, CHIRPP data should be used cautiously in studies of etiology.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (67.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bergman A. B., Rivara F. P. Sweden's experience in reducing childhood injuries. Pediatrics. 1991 Jul;88(1):69–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Langley J. D., Centers for Disease Control (CDC) The role of surveillance in reducing morbidity and mortality from injuries. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1992 Dec;41 (Suppl):181–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Macarthur C., Dougherty G., Pless I. B. Reliability and validity of proxy respondent information about childhood injury: an assessment of a Canadian surveillance system. Am J Epidemiol. 1997 May 1;145(9):834–841. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Macarthur C., Pless I. B. Evaluation of the quality of an injury surveillance system. Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Mar 15;149(6):586–592. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thacker S. B., Berkelman R. L. Public health surveillance in the United States. Epidemiol Rev. 1988;10:164–190. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vimpani G. Injury surveillance: a key to effective control of childhood injuries. Aust Paediatr J. 1989 Feb;25(1):10–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1989.tb01405.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]