Skip to main content
Injury Prevention logoLink to Injury Prevention
. 1999 Sep;5(3):177–182. doi: 10.1136/ip.5.3.177

The "Let's Get Alarmed!" initiative: a smoke alarm giveaway programme

C DiGuiseppi 1, S Slater 1, I Roberts 1, L Adams 1, M Sculpher 1, A Wade 1, M McCarthy 1
PMCID: PMC1730526  PMID: 10518263

Abstract

Objectives—To reduce fires and fire related injuries by increasing the prevalence of functioning smoke alarms in high risk households.

Setting—The programme was delivered in an inner London area with above average material deprivation and below average smoke alarm ownership. The target population included low income and rental households and households with elderly persons or young children.

Methods—Forty wards, averaging 4000 households each, were randomised to intervention or control status. Free smoke alarms and fire safety information were distributed in intervention wards by community groups and workers as part of routine activities and by paid workers who visited target neighbourhoods. Recipients provided data on household age distribution and housing tenure. Programme costs were documented from a societal perspective. Data are being collected on smoke alarm ownership and function, and on fires and related injuries and their costs.

Results—Community and paid workers distributed 20 050 smoke alarms, potentially sufficient to increase smoke alarm ownership by 50% in intervention wards. Compared with the total study population, recipients included greater proportions of low income and rental households and households including children under 5 years or adults aged 65 and older. Total programme costs were £145 087.

Conclusions—It is possible to implement a large scale smoke alarm giveaway programme targeted to high risk households in a densely populated, multicultural, materially deprived community. The programme's effects on the prevalence of installed and functioning alarms and the incidence of fires and fire related injuries, and its cost effectiveness, are being evaluated as a randomised controlled trial.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (104.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. DiGuiseppi C., Roberts I. Injury mortality among children and teenagers in England and Wales, 1992. Inj Prev. 1997 Mar;3(1):47–49. doi: 10.1136/ip.3.1.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DiGuiseppi C., Roberts I., Li L. Smoke alarm ownership and house fire death rates in children. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Nov;52(11):760–761. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.11.760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Guyer B., Gallagher S. S., Chang B. H., Azzara C. V., Cupples L. A., Colton T. Prevention of childhood injuries: evaluation of the Statewide Childhood Injury Prevention Program (SCIPP). Am J Public Health. 1989 Nov;79(11):1521–1527. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.11.1521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jarman B. Underprivileged areas: validation and distribution of scores. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Dec 8;289(6458):1587–1592. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6458.1587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MacKay A. M., Rothman K. J. The incidence and severity of burn injuries following Project Burn Prevention. Am J Public Health. 1982 Mar;72(3):248–252. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.3.248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mallonee S., Istre G. R., Rosenberg M., Reddish-Douglas M., Jordan F., Silverstein P., Tunell W. Surveillance and prevention of residential-fire injuries. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jul 4;335(1):27–31. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199607043350106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McLoughlin E., Vince C. J., Lee A. M., Crawford J. D. Project Burn Prevention: outcome and implications. Am J Public Health. 1982 Mar;72(3):241–247. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.3.241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Paul C. L., Redman S., Evans D. The cost and availability of devices for preventing childhood injuries. J Paediatr Child Health. 1992 Feb;28(1):22–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1992.tb02612.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Roberts I., Power C. Does the decline in child injury mortality vary by social class? A comparison of class specific mortality in 1981 and 1991. BMJ. 1996 Sep 28;313(7060):784–786. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7060.784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Roberts I. Smoke alarm use: prevalence and household predictors. Inj Prev. 1996 Dec;2(4):263–265. doi: 10.1136/ip.2.4.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Runyan C. W., Bangdiwala S. I., Linzer M. A., Sacks J. J., Butts J. Risk factors for fatal residential fires. N Engl J Med. 1992 Sep 17;327(12):859–863. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199209173271207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schwarz D. F., Grisso J. A., Miles C., Holmes J. H., Sutton R. L. An injury prevention program in an urban African-American community. Am J Public Health. 1993 May;83(5):675–680. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.5.675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Injury Prevention are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES