Abstract
Objectives—To determine the effects of a 1988 Maryland law that banned "Saturday night special" handguns on the types of guns used in crime. To determine if controls on the lawful market for handguns affect the illegal market as well.
Setting—Baltimore, Maryland, and 15 other US cities participating in a crime gun tracing project.
Methods—Cross sectional comparison of the proportion of crime guns that are banned by the Maryland law, comparing Baltimore, MD with 15 other cities outside of Maryland. Multivariate linear regression analysis to determine if observed differences between Baltimore and 15 other cities are explained by demographic or regional differences among the cities rather than Maryland's law.
Results—Among crime guns, a gun banned by Maryland's law is more than twice as likely (relative risk (RR) 2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0 to 2.5) to be the subject of a crime gun trace request in 15 other cities combined, than in Baltimore. Among homicide guns, a crime especially relevant for public safety, a comparable difference (RR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.2) was observed. The proportion of Baltimore's crime guns that are banned is 12 percentage points lower than would be expected based on its demographic and regional characteristics alone. Among crime guns purchased after 1990, a much smaller proportion in Baltimore are banned models than in 15 other cities.
Conclusions—Maryland's law has reduced the use of banned Saturday night specials by criminals in Baltimore. Contrary to the claims of some opponents of gun control laws, regulation of the lawful market for firearms can also affect criminals.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (99.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cook P. J., Cole T. B. Strategic thinking about gun markets and violence. JAMA. 1996 Jun 12;275(22):1765–1767. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cukier W. Firearms regulation: Canada in the international context. Chronic Dis Can. 1998;19(1):25–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cummings P., Grossman D. C., Rivara F. P., Koepsell T. D. State gun safe storage laws and child mortality due to firearms. JAMA. 1997 Oct 1;278(13):1084–1086. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loftin C., McDowall D., Wiersema B., Cottey T. J. Effects of restrictive licensing of handguns on homicide and suicide in the District of Columbia. N Engl J Med. 1991 Dec 5;325(23):1615–1620. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199112053252305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peters R., Watson C. A breakthrough in gun control in Australia after the Port Arthur massacre. Inj Prev. 1996 Dec;2(4):253–254. doi: 10.1136/ip.2.4.253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Teret S. P., Alexander G. R., Bailey L. A. The passage of Maryland's gun law: data and advocacy for injury prevention. J Public Health Policy. 1990 Spring;11(1):26–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wintemute G. J., Parham C. A., Wright M. A., Beaumont J. J., Drake C. M. Weapons of choice: previous criminal history, later criminal activity, and firearm preference among legally authorized young adult purchasers of handguns. J Trauma. 1998 Jan;44(1):155–160. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199801000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wintemute G. J. The relationship between firearm design and firearm violence. Handguns in the 1990s. JAMA. 1996 Jun 12;275(22):1749–1753. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]