Skip to main content
Injury Prevention logoLink to Injury Prevention
. 2000 Mar;6(1):9–15. doi: 10.1136/ip.6.1.9

Youth injury data in the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program: do they represent the Canadian experience?

W Pickett 1, R Brison 1, S Mackenzie 1, M Garner 1, M King 1, T Greenberg 1, W Boyce 1
PMCID: PMC1730589  PMID: 10728534

Abstract

Objective—Injuries to Canadian youth (11–15 years) identified from a population based health survey (World Health Organization—Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children Survey, or WHO-HBSC) were compared with youth injuries from a national, emergency department based surveillance system. Comparisons focused on external causes of injury, and examined whether similar rankings of injury patterns and hence priorities for intervention were identified by the different systems.

Setting—The Canadian version of the WHO-HBSC was conducted in 1998. The Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program (CHIRPP) is the national, emergency room based, surveillance program. Two hospitals involved in CHIRPP collectively provide population based data for Kingston, Ontario.

Method—Numbers of injuries selected for study varied by data source: WHO-HBSC (n=3673); CHIRPP (n=20 133); Kingston CHIRPP (n=1944). WHO-HBSC and Kingston CHIRPP records were coded according to four variables in the draft International Classification of External Causes of Injury. Existing CHIRPP codes were available to compare Kingston and other CHIRPP data by five variables. Males and females in the three datasets were ranked according to the external causes. Data classified by source and sex were compared using Spearman's rank correlation statistic.

Results—Rank orders of four variables describing external causes were remarkably similar between the WHO-HBSC and Kingston CHIRPP (ρ>0.78 p<0.004) for mechanism, object, location, and activity). The Kingston and other CHIRPP data were also similar (ρ>0.87; p<0.001) for the variables available to describe external causes of injury (including intent).

Conclusion—The two subsets of the CHIRPP data and the WHO-HBSC data identified similar priorities for injury prevention among young people. These findings indicate that CHIRPP may be representative of general youth injury patterns in Canada. Our study provides a novel and practical model for the validation of injury surveillance programs.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (151.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bienefeld M., Pickett W., Carr P. A. A descriptive study of childhood injuries in Kingston, Ontario, using data from a computerized injury surveillance system. Chronic Dis Can. 1996 Winter;17(1):21–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Castillo D. N., Malit B. D. Occupational injury deaths of 16 and 17 year olds in the US: trends and comparisons with older workers. Inj Prev. 1997 Dec;3(4):277–281. doi: 10.1136/ip.3.4.277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cayten C. G., Quervalu I., Agarwal N. Fatality Analysis Reporting System demonstrates association between trauma system initiatives and decreasing death rates. J Trauma. 1999 May;46(5):751–756. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199905000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Choi B. C., Levitsky M., Lloyd R. D., Stones I. M. Patterns and risk factors for sprains and strain in Ontario, Canada 1990: an analysis of the Workplace Health and Safety Agency data base. J Occup Environ Med. 1996 Apr;38(4):379–389. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199604000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Harel Y., Overpeck M. D., Jones D. H., Scheidt P. C., Bijur P. E., Trumble A. C., Anderson J. The effects of recall on estimating annual nonfatal injury rates for children and adolescents. Am J Public Health. 1994 Apr;84(4):599–605. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.4.599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Harrison J., Tyson D. Injury surveillance in Australia. Acta Paediatr Jpn. 1993 Jun;35(3):171–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200x.1993.tb03034.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Layde P. M. Beyond surveillance: methodologic considerations in analytic studies of agricultural injuries. Am J Ind Med. 1990;18(2):193–200. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700180211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lloyd L. E., Graitcer P. L. The potential for using a trauma registry for injury surveillance and prevention. Am J Prev Med. 1989 Jan-Feb;5(1):34–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mackenzie S. G., Pless I. B. CHIRPP: Canada's principal injury surveillance program. Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program. Inj Prev. 1999 Sep;5(3):208–213. doi: 10.1136/ip.5.3.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McColl A., Roderick P., Cooper C. Hip fracture incidence and mortality in an English Region: a study using routine National Health Service data. J Public Health Med. 1998 Jun;20(2):196–205. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Myers J. R., Hard D. L. Work-related fatalities in the agricultural production and services sectors, 1980-1989. Am J Ind Med. 1995 Jan;27(1):51–63. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700270106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pickett W., Hartling L., Brison R. J. A population-based study of hospitalized injuries in Kingston, Ontario, identified via the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program. Chronic Dis Can. 1997;18(2):61–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pless C. E., Pless I. B. How well they remember. The accuracy of parent reports. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995 May;149(5):553–558. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170180083016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sheps S. Components of a minimum data set. Can J Public Health. 1989 Nov-Dec;80(6):430–432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Thacker S. B., Stroup D. F. Future directions for comprehensive public health surveillance and health information systems in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Sep 1;140(5):383–397. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Weiss H. B. Limitations of child injury data from the CPSC's National Electronic Injury Surveillance System: the case of baby walker related data. Inj Prev. 1996 Mar;2(1):61–66. doi: 10.1136/ip.2.1.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. van Beeck E. F., Looman C. W., Mackenbach J. P. Mortality due to unintentional injuries in The Netherlands, 1950-1995. Public Health Rep. 1998 Sep-Oct;113(5):427–439. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Injury Prevention are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES