Skip to main content
Injury Prevention logoLink to Injury Prevention
. 2000 Jun;6(2):130–134. doi: 10.1136/ip.6.2.130

Evaluation of the Waitakere Community Injury Prevention Project

C Coggan 1, P Patterson 1, M Brewin 1, R Hooper 1, E Robinson 1
PMCID: PMC1730604  PMID: 10875670

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the Waitakere Community Injury Prevention Project (WCIPP).

Methods—Process and outcome evaluations were conducted over a three year period. Process activities included analysis of project documentation, participant observation, key informant interviews, and two post-implementation case studies. A quasiexperimental design was used for the outcome evaluation. Three primary sources of data were collected and analysed: injury statistics; a pre-post telephone survey (n=4000); and a pre-post organisation survey (n=144).

Results—Process evaluation provided a comprehensive account of the operation and activities of the WCIPP. Findings stress the pivotal role of the coordinators and highlight the value of incorporating a multicultural approach. A positive impact on changes to Waitakere City Council safety policies and practices was also evident. Outcome evaluation findings demonstrated significant reductions in rates of Waitakere child injury hospitalisations (p<0.05), while comparison communities showed an increase in child hospitalisation rates. In addition, compared with pre-intervention and comparison data, significantly more Waitakere residents were aware of injury prevention safety messages (p=0.0001) and had acquired appropriate child safety items (p=0.0001).

Conclusion—The community injury prevention model appears to be an effective strategy for injury prevention. The support provided by the council for the WCIPP has provided a benchmark for the role of local governments in injury prevention.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (135.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Jeffs D., Booth D., Calvert D. Local injury information, community participation and injury reduction. Aust J Public Health. 1993 Dec;17(4):365–372. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Langley J. D., Alsop J. C. Lidköping Accident Prevention Programme: what was the impact? Inj Prev. 1996 Jun;2(2):131–134. doi: 10.1136/ip.2.2.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lindqvist K., Timpka T., Schelp L., Ahlgren M. The WHO safe community program for injury prevention: evaluation of the impact on injury severity. Public Health. 1998 Nov;112(6):385–391. doi: 10.1038/sj.ph.1900505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Svanström L., Ekman R., Schelp L., Lindström A. The Lidköping Accident Prevention Programme--a community approach to preventing childhood injuries in Sweden. Inj Prev. 1995 Sep;1(3):169–172. doi: 10.1136/ip.1.3.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ytterstad B., Smith G. S., Coggan C. A. Harstad injury prevention study: prevention of burns in young children by community based intervention. Inj Prev. 1998 Sep;4(3):176–180. doi: 10.1136/ip.4.3.176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Injury Prevention are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES