Abstract
Objectives—To determine the relative incidence of gun victimization versus self defense gun use by civilians in the United States, and the circumstances and probable legality of the self defense uses.
Methods—National random digit dial telephone surveys of the adult population were conducted in 1996 and 1999. The Harvard surveys appear unique among private surveys in two respects: asking (1) open ended questions about defensive gun use incidents and (2) detailed questions about both gun victimization and self defense gun use. Five criminal court judges were asked to assess whether the self reported defensive gun uses were likely to have been legal.
Results—Even after excluding many reported firearm victimizations, far more survey respondents report having been threatened or intimidated with a gun than having used a gun to protect themselves. A majority of the reported self defense gun uses were rated as probably illegal by a majority of judges. This was so even under the assumption that the respondent had a permit to own and carry the gun, and that the respondent had described the event honestly.
Conclusions—Guns are used to threaten and intimidate far more often than they are used in self defense. Most self reported self defense gun uses may well be illegal and against the interests of society.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (114.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Annest J. L., Mercy J. A., Gibson D. R., Ryan G. W. National estimates of nonfatal firearm-related injuries. Beyond the tip of the iceberg. JAMA. 1995 Jun 14;273(22):1749–1754. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Azrael D., Hemenway D. 'In the safety of your own home': results from a national survey on gun use at home. Soc Sci Med. 2000 Jan;50(2):285–291. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00283-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DelPrete L. R., Caldwell M., English C., Banspach S. W., Lefebvre C. Self-reported and measured weights and heights of participants in community-based weight loss programs. J Am Diet Assoc. 1992 Dec;92(12):1483–1486. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gosling S. D., John O. P., Craik K. H., Robins R. W. Do people know how they behave? Self-reported act frequencies compared with on-line codings by observers. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 May;74(5):1337–1349. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.5.1337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- John O. P., Robins R. W. Accuracy and bias in self-perception: individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Jan;66(1):206–219. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.66.1.206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krosnick J. A. Survey research. Annu Rev Psychol. 1999;50:537–567. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McDowall D., Wiersema B. The incidence of defensive firearm use by US crime victims, 1987 through 1990. Am J Public Health. 1994 Dec;84(12):1982–1984. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.12.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith T. W. Discrepancies between men and women in reporting number of sexual partners: a summary from four countries. Soc Biol. 1992 Fall-Winter;39(3-4):203–211. doi: 10.1080/19485565.1992.9988817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]