Skip to main content
PMC home page
Injury Prevention logoLink to Injury Prevention
. 2002 Jun;8(2):106–110. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.2.106

Association between state level drinking and driving countermeasures and self reported alcohol impaired driving

R Shults 1, D Sleet 1, R Elder 1, G Ryan 1, M Sehgal 1
PMCID: PMC1730839  PMID: 12120827

Abstract

Objectives: In 1999, alcohol related motor vehicle crashes in the United States claimed 15 786 lives and injured more than 300 000 persons. Drinking and driving behavior is shaped by individual and environmental level influences. In this study, the association between each state's driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) countermeasures and self reported alcohol impaired driving was explored.

Methods: Mothers Against Drunk Driving's (MADD's) Rating the States 2000 survey, which graded states on their DUI countermeasures from 1996–99, was used as an index of each state's comprehensive DUI prevention activities. Information on alcohol impaired driving from residents of each state was obtained from the 1997 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey. The association between the MADD state grades and alcohol impaired driving was assessed using multiple logistic regression.

Results: Of the 64 162 BRFSS respondents who reported drinking any alcohol during the past month, 2.1% of women and 5.8% of men reported at least one episode of alcohol impaired driving in the past month. Those living in states with a MADD grade of "D" were 60% more likely to report alcohol impaired driving than those from states with a MADD grade of "A" (odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 2.1). The association existed for men and women.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that stronger state level DUI countermeasures are associated with lower rates of self reported alcohol impaired driving.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (122.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. DeJong W., Hingson R. Strategies to reduce driving under the influence of alcohol. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:359–378. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Everett S. A., Shults R. A., Barrios L. C., Sacks J. J., Lowry R., Oeltmann J. Trends and subgroup differences in transportation-related injury risk and safety behaviors among high school students, 1991-1997. J Adolesc Health. 2001 Mar;28(3):228–234. doi: 10.1016/s1054-139x(00)00177-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Farrell S. Policy alternatives for alcohol-impaired driving. Health Educ Q. 1989 Fall;16(3):413–427. doi: 10.1177/109019818901600309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Greenland S. Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis. Am J Public Health. 1989 Mar;79(3):340–349. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.3.340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Holder H. D., Gruenewald P. J., Ponicki W. R., Treno A. J., Grube J. W., Saltz R. F., Voas R. B., Reynolds R., Davis J., Sanchez L. Effect of community-based interventions on high-risk drinking and alcohol-related injuries. JAMA. 2000 Nov 8;284(18):2341–2347. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.18.2341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu S., Siegel P. Z., Brewer R. D., Mokdad A. H., Sleet D. A., Serdula M. Prevalence of alcohol-impaired driving. Results from a national self-reported survey of health behaviors. JAMA. 1997 Jan 8;277(2):122–125. doi: 10.1001/jama.277.2.122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Milio N. Making healthy public policy; developing the science by learning the art: an ecological framework for policy studies. Health Promot. 1987;2(3):263–274. doi: 10.1093/heapro/2.3.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. O'Malley P. M., Johnston L. D. Drinking and driving among US high school seniors, 1984-1997. Am J Public Health. 1999 May;89(5):678–684. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.5.678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Remington P. L., Smith M. Y., Williamson D. F., Anda R. F., Gentry E. M., Hogelin G. C. Design, characteristics, and usefulness of state-based behavioral risk factor surveillance: 1981-87. Public Health Rep. 1988 Jul-Aug;103(4):366–375. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Russell A., Voas R. B., Dejong W., Chaloupka M. MADD rates the states: a media advocacy event to advance the agenda against alcohol-impaired driving. Public Health Rep. 1995 May-Jun;110(3):240–245. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shults R. A., Elder R. W., Sleet D. A., Nichols J. L., Alao M. O., Carande-Kulis V. G., Zaza S., Sosin D. M., Thompson R. S., Task Force on Community Preventive Services Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce alcohol-impaired driving. Am J Prev Med. 2001 Nov;21(4 Suppl):66–88. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00381-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Simons-Morton B. G., Brink S. G., Simons-Morton D. G., McIntyre R., Chapman M., Longoria J., Parcel G. S. An ecological approach to the prevention of injuries due to drinking and driving. Health Educ Q. 1989 Fall;16(3):397–411. doi: 10.1177/109019818901600308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sleet D. A., Wagenaar A. C., Waller P. F. Drinking, driving, and health promotion. Health Educ Q. 1989 Fall;16(3):329–333. doi: 10.1177/109019818901600302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wagenaar A. C., Murray D. M., Toomey T. L. Communities mobilizing for change on alcohol (CMCA): effects of a randomized trial on arrests and traffic crashes. Addiction. 2000 Feb;95(2):209–217. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.9522097.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Injury Prevention are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES