Skip to main content
Injury Prevention logoLink to Injury Prevention
. 2003 Jun;9(2):142–146. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.2.142

Persistence of effects of a brief intervention on parental restrictions of teen driving privileges

B Simons-Morton 1, J Hartos 1, K Beck 1
PMCID: PMC1730968  PMID: 12810741

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which effects of exposure to a brief intervention designed to increase parental restrictions on teen driving privileges persisted over time.

Design: A total of 658 parents and their 16 year old adolescents were recruited from a local motor vehicle administration (MVA) site as adolescents successfully tested for provisional licenses. At the MVA, parents completed written surveys about expected teen driving during the first month of provisional licensure. Afterwards, on weeks assigned as intervention, parents watched a video and were given the video and a driving agreement to take home. Both parents and teens completed follow up telephone interviews about communication, amounts, and limits on teen driving at one month (579 dyads), four months (529 dyads), and nine months (528 dyads).

Results: The results indicated that both intervention parents and teens were much more likely to report using a driving agreement at each follow up during the nine month period. Significant treatment group differences persisted for communication about driving, but effects related to limits on teen driving that were evident at one month declined over time. Reports for passenger, road, and overall limits remained significant at four months; fewer were present at nine months. There were no differences in amounts of teen driving at four or nine months.

Conclusions: It is possible to reach parents through brief interventions at the MVA and successfully promote increases in initial parental restrictions on teen driving with modest persistence for at least four months.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (135.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arnett J. J. Developmental sources of crash risk in young drivers. Inj Prev. 2002 Sep;8 (Suppl 2):ii17–ii23. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.suppl_2.ii17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beck Kenneth H., Hartos Jessica, Simons-Morton Bruce. Teen driving risk: the promise of parental influence and public policy. Health Educ Behav. 2002 Feb;29(1):73–84. doi: 10.1177/109019810202900108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bettinghaus E. P. Health promotion and the knowledge-attitude-behavior continuum. Prev Med. 1986 Sep;15(5):475–491. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(86)90025-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Motor-vehicle safety: a 20th century public health achievement. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999 May 14;48(18):369–374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen L. H., Baker S. P., Braver E. R., Li G. Carrying passengers as a risk factor for crashes fatal to 16- and 17-year-old drivers. JAMA. 2000 Mar 22;283(12):1578–1582. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.12.1578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Doherty S. T., Andrey J. C., MacGregor C. The situational risks of young drivers: the influence of passengers, time of day and day of week on accident rates. Accid Anal Prev. 1998 Jan;30(1):45–52. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(97)00060-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ferguson S. A., Leaf W. A., Williams A. F., Preusser D. F. Differences in young driver crash involvement in states with varying licensure practices. Accid Anal Prev. 1996 Mar;28(2):171–180. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(95)00051-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Foss R. D., Feaganes J. R., Rodgman E. A. Initial effects of graduated driver licensing on 16-year-old driver crashes in North Carolina. JAMA. 2001 Oct 3;286(13):1588–1592. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.13.1588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mayhew D. R., Simpson H. M. The safety value of driver education and training. Inj Prev. 2002 Sep;8 (Suppl 2):ii3–ii8. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.suppl_2.ii3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McKnight A. J., Peck R. C. Graduated driver licensing: what works? Inj Prev. 2002 Sep;8 (Suppl 2):ii32–ii38. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.suppl_2.ii32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Preusser D. F., Ferguson S. A., Williams A. F. The effect of teenage passengers on the fatal crash risk of teenage drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 1998 Mar;30(2):217–222. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(97)00081-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shope J. T., Molnar L. J., Elliott M. R., Waller P. F. Graduated driver licensing in Michigan: early impact on motor vehicle crashes among 16-year-old drivers. JAMA. 2001 Oct 3;286(13):1593–1598. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.13.1593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Simons-Morton B. G., Hartos J. L., Leaf W. A. Promoting parental management of teen driving. Inj Prev. 2002 Sep;8 (Suppl 2):ii24–ii31. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.suppl_2.ii24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Simons-Morton B. G. Reducing young driver crash risk. Inj Prev. 2002 Sep;8 (Suppl 2):ii1–ii2. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.suppl_2.ii1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vernick J. S., Li G., Ogaitis S., MacKenzie E. J., Baker S. P., Gielen A. C. Effects of high school driver education on motor vehicle crashes, violations, and licensure. Am J Prev Med. 1999 Jan;16(1 Suppl):40–46. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00115-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Williams A. F., Ferguson S. A. Rationale for graduated licensing and the risks it should address. Inj Prev. 2002 Sep;8 (Suppl 2):ii9–ii16. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.suppl_2.ii9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Williams A. F., Preusser D. F. Night driving restrictions for youthful drivers: a literature review and commentary. J Public Health Policy. 1997;18(3):334–345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Injury Prevention are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES