Skip to main content
Injury Prevention logoLink to Injury Prevention
. 2003 Jun;9(2):184–186. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.2.184

Routine narrative analysis as a screening tool to improve data quality

S Jones 1, R Lyons 1
PMCID: PMC1730971  PMID: 12810750

Abstract

Aim: To determine whether narrative information in emergency department surveillance systems can be systematically interrogated to improve our understanding of the causes of injury.

Methods: Screening algorithms for location, intent, and activity were developed from structured analysis of narrative data from 98 999 records. The algorithms were then tested on a 50 000 record database containing entries in both of the two narrative fields. A proxy gold standard was defined as the total extract using both code and narrative. Sensitivity and specificity of the emergency department coding and narrative algorithms was calculated.

Results: The proportion of records carrying an informative emergency department code was higher in records containing narrative—the percentage of causes coded "not know" dropped by 28.3%. The sensitivity of coded data varied from 42% to 98 % and from 33% to 99% for narrative data. Narrative analysis increased the percentage of home injuries identified by 19%, assaults by 26%, and rugby injuries by 137%.

Conclusions: Using a small amount of narrative is a practical and effective means of developing more informative injury causation data in an emergency department based surveillance system. It allows for internal validation of the codes and for the identification of emerging hazards without adding more "tick boxes" or further burdening data entry clerks.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (45.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burt C. W., Overpeck M. D. Emergency visits for sports-related injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Mar;37(3):301–308. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.111707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Greenhalgh T., Hurwitz B. Narrative based medicine: why study narrative? BMJ. 1999 Jan 2;318(7175):48–50. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7175.48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lyons R. A., Jones S., Kemp A., Sibert J., Shepherd J., Richmond P., Bartlett C., Palmer S. R. Development and use of a population based injury surveillance system: the all Wales Injury Surveillance System (AWISS). Inj Prev. 2002 Mar;8(1):83–86. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.1.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McCullough P. A., Smith G. S. Evaluation of narrative text for case finding: the need for accuracy measurement. Am J Ind Med. 1998 Aug;34(2):133–136. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199808)34:2<133::aid-ajim5>3.0.co;2-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Stone D. H., Morrison A., Ohn T. T. Developing injury surveillance in accident and emergency departments. Arch Dis Child. 1998 Feb;78(2):108–110. doi: 10.1136/adc.78.2.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Xia Z., Sorock G. S., Zhu J., Courtney T. K., Fu H., Liang Y., Christiani D. C. Fatal occupational injuries in the construction industry of a new development area in east China, 1991 to 1997. AIHAJ. 2000 Sep-Oct;61(5):733–737. doi: 10.1080/15298660008984584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Injury Prevention are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES