Skip to main content
PMC home page
Injury Prevention logoLink to Injury Prevention
. 2003 Sep;9(3):261–265. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.3.261

Home delivery of an injury prevention kit for children in four French cities: a controlled randomized trial

M Sznajder 1, S Leduc 1, M Janvrin 1, M Bonnin 1, P Aegerter 1, F Baudier 1, B Chevallier 1, C Macarthur 1
PMCID: PMC1730977  PMID: 12966017

Abstract

Objectives: Home delivery of counselling and safety devices to prevent child injuries could help parents to adopt safe behaviour. The aim of this study was to test a safety kit designed and used in Quebec (Canada).

Design and subjects: One hundred families from four towns in the Paris suburbs were visited at home by nurses or doctors when their child reached 6–9 months. Selection criteria were: primipara, medical problem, psychological, and/or socioeconomic difficulties.

Interventions: During the first visit, 50 families (group 1) received counselling and a kit including preventive devices and pamphlets about indoor injuries and ways to avoid them. The other 50 families (group 2) received counselling but not the kit. A second home visit was made 6–8 weeks later.

Main outcome measures: The number of safety improvements was calculated 6–8 weeks after a first home visit. Perceived usefulness of the kit was collected from families and from interviewers.

Results: Between the first and the second visits, safety improvement was significantly higher in the group with the kit. This was mainly related to the risk of fall (p<0.02), fire and burns (p<0.001), poisoning (p<0.01), and suffocation (p<0.001). For improvement related to devices provided in the kit, the difference between the groups was significant: 64.4% improvement in group 1 versus 41.2% in group 2 (p<0.01). The relative risk (RR) of safety improvement between groups was 1.56 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35 to 1.80). Even for improvements not related to the kit the difference remained significant: 31.2% in group 1 versus 20.2% in group 2 (p<0.05); RR = 1.54 (95% CI 1.22 to 1.93).

Conclusion: Routine home visits by social services offer a good opportunity to tackle child injury prevention. Free delivery of prevention kits and counselling allow families to modify their behaviour and homes so as to reduce risks.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (68.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bablouzian L., Freedman E. S., Wolski K. E., Fried L. E. Evaluation of a community based childhood injury prevention program. Inj Prev. 1997 Mar;3(1):14–16. doi: 10.1136/ip.3.1.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Capon-Degardin N., Martinot-Duquennoy V., Lesage-Maillard V., de Broucker V., Patenotre P., Herbaux B., Pellerin P., Gottrand L. Les brûlures de la face chez l'enfant. A propos de 197 patients. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2001 Jun;46(3):190–195. doi: 10.1016/s0294-1260(01)00020-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Colver A. F., Hutchinson P. J., Judson E. C. Promoting children's home safety. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 Oct 23;285(6349):1177–1180. doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6349.1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dershewitz R. A., Williamson J. W. Prevention of childhood household injuries: a controlled clinical trial. Am J Public Health. 1977 Dec;67(12):1148–1153. doi: 10.2105/ajph.67.12.1148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DiGuiseppi C., Roberts I. G. Individual-level injury prevention strategies in the clinical setting. Future Child. 2000 Spring-Summer;10(1):53–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DiGuiseppi C., Slater S., Roberts I., Adams L., Sculpher M., Wade A., McCarthy M. The "Let's Get Alarmed!" initiative: a smoke alarm giveaway programme. Inj Prev. 1999 Sep;5(3):177–182. doi: 10.1136/ip.5.3.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dowswell T., Towner E. M., Simpson G., Jarvis S. N. Preventing childhood unintentional injuries--what works? A literature review. Inj Prev. 1996 Jun;2(2):140–149. doi: 10.1136/ip.2.2.140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dowswell Therese, Towner Elizabeth. Social deprivation and the prevention of unintentional injury in childhood: a systematic review. Health Educ Res. 2002 Apr;17(2):221–237. doi: 10.1093/her/17.2.221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hapgood R., Kendrick D., Marsh P. How well do socio-demographic characteristics explain variation in childhood safety practices? J Public Health Med. 2000 Sep;22(3):307–311. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/22.3.307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. King W. J., Klassen T. P., LeBlanc J., Bernard-Bonnin A. C., Robitaille Y., Pham B., Coyle D., Tenenbein M., Pless I. B. The effectiveness of a home visit to prevent childhood injury. Pediatrics. 2001 Aug;108(2):382–388. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.2.382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Klassen T. P., MacKay J. M., Moher D., Walker A., Jones A. L. Community-based injury prevention interventions. Future Child. 2000 Spring-Summer;10(1):83–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mallonee S. Evaluating injury prevention programs: the Oklahoma City Smoke Alarm Project. Future Child. 2000 Spring-Summer;10(1):164–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Masson F., Savès M., Salmi L. R., Bourdé A., Henrion G., Erny P. Injuries in a problematic socioeconomic context: a population-based study in Réunion, Indian Ocean, 1993-1994. GEAR. Groupement d'Etude sur les Accidents à la Réunion. Int J Epidemiol. 1997 Oct;26(5):1033–1040. doi: 10.1093/ije/26.5.1033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mercier C., Blond M. H. Epidemiological survey of childhood burn injuries in France. Burns. 1996 Feb;22(1):29–34. doi: 10.1016/0305-4179(95)00073-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Miller T. R., Levy D. T. Cost-outcome analysis in injury prevention and control: eighty-four recent estimates for the United States. Med Care. 2000 Jun;38(6):562–582. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200006000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Roberts I., Kramer M. S., Suissa S. Does home visiting prevent childhood injury? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 1996 Jan 6;312(7022):29–33. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7022.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Roberts I., Power C. Does the decline in child injury mortality vary by social class? A comparison of class specific mortality in 1981 and 1991. BMJ. 1996 Sep 28;313(7060):784–786. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7060.784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sznajder M., Chevallier B., Leroux G., Bruneau C., Yacoubovitch J., Auvert B. Analyse des accidents de l'enfant: premiers résultats de l'Observatoire de Boulogne-Billancourt. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2001 Apr;49(2):125–134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tursz A., Lelong N., Crost M. Home accidents to children under 2 years of age. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1990 Oct;4(4):408–421. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1990.tb00668.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Injury Prevention are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES