Abstract
Aim—To evaluate whether the assessment of multiple sections from retrieved nodes yields an increased number of metastases compared with the number that would be detected by the commonly applied method of microscopy of a single section of lymph node only.
Methods—A prospective study of 72 colorectal carcinoma resection specimens. Lymph node sampling was based on the current guidelines for the detection of breast cancer metastases in axillary nodes. Lymph nodes up to approximately 5 mm in maximum extent were processed in entirety, without prior sectioning, and assessed histologically at three levels; larger lymph nodes were processed in entirety as multiple sections and histologically assessed at one level.
Results—From a total of 72 carcinomas, eight were Dukes's A, 26 were Dukes's B, and 38 were Dukes's C. The mean and median numbers of nodes identified were 13 and 12, respectively (range, three to 44). Of the Dukes's C cases, four contained lymph node metastases identified by our method that might have gone undetected by the current, generally applied method. In one case, this led to the detection of the only nodal metastasis present and therefore "upstaged" the tumour from Dukes's B to C. On average, six extra tissue blocks were processed for each case in applying this method.
Conclusion—The assessment of multiple sections of lymph nodes from colorectal specimens leads to the detection of only a small number of additional nodal metastases. The method involves increased workload for pathologists and laboratory staff.
Key Words: colorectal carcinoma • lymph node • metastases
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (81.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Goldstein N. S., Sanford W., Coffey M., Layfield L. J. Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma. Trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered. Am J Clin Pathol. 1996 Aug;106(2):209–216. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/106.2.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hayashi N., Arakawa H., Nagase H., Yanagisawa A., Kato Y., Ohta H., Takano S., Ogawa M., Nakamura Y. Genetic diagnosis identifies occult lymph node metastases undetectable by the histopathological method. Cancer Res. 1994 Jul 15;54(14):3853–3856. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hayashi N., Ito I., Yanagisawa A., Kato Y., Nakamori S., Imaoka S., Watanabe H., Ogawa M., Nakamura Y. Genetic diagnosis of lymph-node metastasis in colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1995 May 20;345(8960):1257–1259. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90922-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hernanz F., Revuelta S., Redondo C., Madrazo C., Castillo J., Gómez-Fleitas M. Colorectal adenocarcinoma: quality of the assessment of lymph node metastases. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994 Apr;37(4):373–377. doi: 10.1007/BF02053600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liefers G. J., Tollenaar R. A., Cleton-Jansen A. M. Molecular detection of minimal residual disease in colorectal and breast cancer. Histopathology. 1999 May;34(5):385–390. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1999.00716.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sasaki M., Watanabe H., Jass J. R., Ajioka Y., Kobayashi M., Hatakeyama K. Immunoperoxidase staining for cytokeratins 8 and 18 is very sensitive for detection of occult node metastasis of colorectal cancer: a comparison with genetic analysis of K-ras. Histopathology. 1998 Mar;32(3):199–208. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1998.00338.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scott K. W., Grace R. H. Detection of lymph node metastases in colorectal carcinoma before and after fat clearance. Br J Surg. 1989 Nov;76(11):1165–1167. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800761118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scott K. W., Grace R. H., Gibbons P. Five-year follow-up study of the fat clearance technique in colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994 Feb;37(2):126–128. doi: 10.1007/BF02047533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilkinson E. J., Hause L. Probability in lymph node sectioning. Cancer. 1974 May;33(5):1269–1274. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197405)33:5<1269::aid-cncr2820330512>3.0.co;2-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]