Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 2001 Oct;54(10):806–808. doi: 10.1136/jcp.54.10.806

Are clinicians failing to supply adequate information when requesting a histopathological investigation?

J Burton 1, T Stephenson 1
PMCID: PMC1731285  PMID: 11577135

Abstract

Aims—There is a perception among histopathologists that specimens are often received without adequate clinical details. This is the first study to determine the adequacy of information provided when histopathological investigations are requested.

Methods—Two thousand sequential requests for histological examination were assessed for adequacy and completeness.

Results—There was no significant difference in the demographic details supplied by physicians and surgeons. Clinical details were inadequate in 6.1% of cases: those from physicians were significantly more often adequate (98.7% v 90.6%) and more often included a diagnosis (74.4% v 38.8%) than those from surgeons. Physicians were more likely to supply their name and contact number but requests frequently lacked details of the sender.

Conclusions—Specimens are infrequently received with inadequate demographic details, but clinical details and details of the sender are more often lacking. Education of clinical colleagues is required if pathologists are to manage the demand for the service.

Key Words: surgical pathology • demand management

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (132.9 KB).


Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES