Abstract
In the past decade, cellular immunophenotyping has become a new discipline in diagnostic haematology and immunology, and is invaluable in the rapid diagnosis of leukaemia and monitoring disease progression in human immunodeficiency virus infected individuals. The introduction of bench top flow cytometers has meant that immunophenotyping is now also used for the quantitation of CD34+ peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) to ensure the correct timing and adequacy of haematopoietic progenitor cell harvests. Furthermore, flow cytometry has become an important tool for the counting of leucocytes in blood components after leucocyte depletion. Because this new discipline is now such a major diagnostic and prognostic tool in the clinical arena, its use must be subject to both internal and external quality control. Such a requirement was first recognised as early as 1986 when an Inter-Regional Quality Assessment Scheme (IRQAS) was initiated for laboratories that undertook the immunocytochemical diagnosis of leukaemia using the alkaline phosphates anti-alkaline phosphatase technique. This programme began with around 25 UK laboratories. In 1990, after the introduction of two more programmes (one for leukaemia diagnosis using UV microscopy and latterly flow cytometry, and one for the enumeration of CD4+ T cells) the IRQAS achieved UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme (UK NEQAS) status and changed its title to UK NEQAS for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping. In the past decade the once small IRQAS programme has evolved into the largest international scheme of its kind, providing EQA to over 650 laboratories world wide for leukaemia immunophenotyping, lymphocyte subset analysis, PBSCs, and more recently low level leucocyte counting. Over the years, this EQA programme has highlighted important problems, such as the inappropriate use of fluorochromes and antibody titre, and the identification of effective gating strategies, all of which have contributed directly to the high interlaboratory variations seen in cellular immunophenotyping. Furthermore, particularly in absolute counting of lymphocyte subsets, PBSCs, and the enumeration of low numbers of leucocytes, UK NEQAS for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping programmes have been instrumental in highlighting the differences that occur between single and dual platform flow cytometric technologies. As a result of these findings, UK NEQAS for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping has helped to reduce the variation seen on an interlaboratory basis and enabled greater standardisation both in the UK and internationally. These advances have been attributable to the development, by UK NEQAS for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping, of a unique whole blood stabilising process that ensures the retention of the physical characteristics (both light scatter and antigenic profile) required of cells to ensure successful cellular immunophenotyping. This major technological advancement has enabled the distribution of specimens for EQA purposes on a global scale that have minimal matrix effect and behave in a manner identical to fresh blood for several months after stabilisation.
Key Words: leucocyte immunophenotyping • leukaemia • human immunodeficiency virus infection • flow cytometry • guidelines
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (94.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barnett D., Granger V., Storie I., Peel J., Pollitt R., Smart T., Reilly J. T. Quality assessment of CD34+ stem cell enumeration: experience of the United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme (UK NEQAS) using a unique stable whole blood preparation. Br J Haematol. 1998 Jul;102(2):553–565. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.00784.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barnett D., Granger V., Whitby L., Storie I., Reilly J. T. Absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte and CD34+ stem cell counts by single-platform flow cytometry: the way forward. Br J Haematol. 1999 Sep;106(4):1059–1062. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01632.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barnett D., Janossy G., Lubenko A., Matutes E., Newland A., Reilly J. T. Guideline for the flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ haematopoietic stem cells. Prepared by the CD34+ haematopoietic stem cell working party. General Haematology Task Force of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Clin Lab Haematol. 1999 Oct;21(5):301–308. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2257.1999.00253.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chang A., Ma D. D. The influence of flow cytometric gating strategy on the standardization of CD34+ cell quantitation: an Australian multicenter study. Australasian BMT Scientists Study Group. J Hematother. 1996 Dec;5(6):605–616. doi: 10.1089/scd.1.1996.5.605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Forrest M. J., Barnett D. Laboratory control of immunocytochemistry. Eur J Haematol. 1989 Jan;42(1):67–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1989.tb00249.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gratama J. W., Kraan J., Levering W., Van Bockstaele D. R., Rijkers G. T., Van der Schoot C. E. Analysis of variation in results of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cell enumeration in a multicenter study. Cytometry. 1997 Jun 15;30(3):109–117. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0320(19970615)30:3<109::aid-cyto1>3.0.co;2-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hassett J., Parker J. Laboratory practices in reporting flow cytometry phenotyping results for leukemia/lymphoma specimens: results of a survey. Cytometry. 1995 Dec 15;22(4):264–330. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990220403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Homburger H. A., Rosenstock W., Paxton H., Paton M. L., Landay A. L. Assessment of interlaboratory variability of immunophenotyping. Results of the College of American Pathologists Flow Cytometry Survey. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Mar 20;677:43–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb38762.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Immunophenotyping in the diagnosis of acute leukaemias. General Haematology Task Force of BCSH. J Clin Pathol. 1994 Sep;47(9):777–781. doi: 10.1136/jcp.47.9.777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Immunophenotyping in the diagnosis of chronic lymphoproliferative disorders. General Haematology Task Force of BCSH. J Clin Pathol. 1994 Oct;47(10):871–875. doi: 10.1136/jcp.47.10.871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krause D. S., Fackler M. J., Civin C. I., May W. S. CD34: structure, biology, and clinical utility. Blood. 1996 Jan 1;87(1):1–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Macey M. G., McCarthy D. A., van Agthoven A., Newland A. C. How should CD34+ cells be analysed? A study of three classes of antibody and five leucocyte preparation procedures. J Immunol Methods. 1997 May 26;204(2):175–188. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1759(97)00045-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reilly J. T. Use and evaluation of leucocyte monoclonal antibodies in the diagnostic laboratory: a review. Clin Lab Haematol. 1996 Mar;18(1):1–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2257.1996.tb00728.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson G., Morgan L., Evans M., McDermott S., Pereira S., Wansbrough-Jones M., Griffin G. Effect of type of haematology analyser on CD4 count. Lancet. 1992 Aug 22;340(8817):485–485. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91807-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Storr J., Dolan G., Coustan-Smith E., Barnett D., Reilly J. T. Value of monoclonal anti-myeloperoxidase (MPO7) for diagnosing acute leukaemia. J Clin Pathol. 1990 Oct;43(10):847–849. doi: 10.1136/jcp.43.10.847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van't Veer M. B., Kluin-Nelemans J. C., van der Schoot C. E., van Putten W. L., Adriaansen H. J., van Wering E. R. Quality assessment of immunological marker analysis and the immunological diagnosis in leukaemia and lymphoma: a multi-centre study. Dutch Cooperative Study Group on Immunophenotyping of Leukaemias and Lymphomas (SIHON). Br J Haematol. 1992 Apr;80(4):458–465. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1992.tb04558.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]