Abstract
Aims—To compare clinical information and sputum microscopy as methods for the selection of samples for enhanced mycobacterial detection, identification, and susceptibility systems (EMDISS) to promote the rapid diagnosis of patients with infectious pulmonary tuberculosis.
Methods—Two thousand, two hundred and sixty four specimen request forms were examined for clinical details, which were then used to identify specimens likely to yield Mycobacterium tuberculosis on culture. These results were compared with the results of sputum microscopy for acid fast bacilli (AFB). Both methods were assessed against the results of culture using a combination of continuous automated mycobacterial liquid culture (CAMLiC) and conventional solid culture.
Results—Classification based on clinical details was an inefficient method of identifying high priority specimens for EMDISS. Although, when given, clinical details were often consistent, a substantial proportion of specimens arrived with no details. This approach would result in the referral of at least 16% of the workload but lead to the detection by culture of only 46% of the M tuberculosis present within it. In contrast, microscopy for AFB defined a much smaller number of specimens (4.8% of the total), which contained 90% of the M tuberculosis isolates.
Conclusions—Microscopy for AFB is the most efficient method for defining sputum specimens suitable for referral for enhanced mycobacteriological techniques. However, it is essential that the methods used for smear preparation and microscopy are of the highest possible standard, otherwise some patients with infectious pulmonary tuberculosis will be denied, unnecessarily, the benefits of important advances in mycobacteriology.
Key Words: tuberculosis • diagnosis • AFB smear • mycobacterial culture
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (142.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cohen R., Muzaffar S., Capellan J., Azar H., Chinikamwala M. The validity of classic symptoms and chest radiographic configuration in predicting pulmonary tuberculosis. Chest. 1996 Feb;109(2):420–423. doi: 10.1378/chest.109.2.420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drobniewski F. A., Watt B., Smith E. G., Magee J. G., Williams R., Holder J., Ostrowski J. A national audit of the laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases within the United Kingdom. J Clin Pathol. 1999 May;52(5):334–337. doi: 10.1136/jcp.52.5.334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El-Solh A. A., Hsiao C. B., Goodnough S., Serghani J., Grant B. J. Predicting active pulmonary tuberculosis using an artificial neural network. Chest. 1999 Oct;116(4):968–973. doi: 10.1378/chest.116.4.968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El-Solh A., Mylotte J., Sherif S., Serghani J., Grant B. J. Validity of a decision tree for predicting active pulmonary tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 May;155(5):1711–1716. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.155.5.9154881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kearns A. M., Freeman R., Steward M., Magee J. G. A rapid polymerase chain reaction technique for detecting M tuberculosis in a variety of clinical specimens. J Clin Pathol. 1998 Dec;51(12):922–924. doi: 10.1136/jcp.51.12.922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Magee J. G., Freeman R., Barrett A. Enhanced speed and sensitivity in the cultural diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis with a continuous automated mycobacterial liquid culture (CAMLiC) system. J Med Microbiol. 1998 Jun;47(6):547–553. doi: 10.1099/00222615-47-6-547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peterson E. M., Lu R., Floyd C., Nakasone A., Friedly G., de la Maza L. M. Direct identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium avium, and Mycobacterium intracellulare from amplified primary cultures in BACTEC media using DNA probes. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Jul;27(7):1543–1547. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.7.1543-1547.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salfinger M. Diagnosis of tuberculosis and other diseases caused by mycobacteria. Infection. 1997 Jan-Feb;25(1):60–62. doi: 10.1007/BF02113517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salfinger M., Pfyffer G. E. The new diagnostic mycobacteriology laboratory. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Nov;13(11):961–979. doi: 10.1007/BF02111498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]