Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2000 Feb;54(2):143–148. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.2.143

Accuracy of the estimated prevalence of obesity from self reported height and weight in an adult Scottish population

C Bolton-Smith 1, M Woodward 1, H Tunstall-Pedoe 1, C Morrison 1
PMCID: PMC1731630  PMID: 10715748

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE—To determine whether self reported heights and weights from Scottish adults can provide an accurate assessment of obesity prevalence in the population.
DESIGN—Standardised clinic measurements of weight and height were compared against self reported values on a postal questionnaire in the fourth Scottish MONICA cross sectional study.
SETTING—A sex and five year age band stratified random population sample drawn from general practitioner registers in north Glasgow in 1995. Response rate 63% for men and 62% for women.
PARTICIPANTS—A total of 865 men and 971 women aged between 25 and 64 years.
RESULTS—Men and women under-reported their weight by a mean (SD) of 0.63 (3.45) kg and 0.95 (2.64) kg respectively, and their height by a mean (SD) of 1.3 (2.50) cm and 1.7 (2.37) cm respectively. Estimated body mass index, BMI (kg/m2) varied from true (measured) BMI by +0.19 (1.40) for men and by +0.17 (1.34) for women. The only age/sex group in which BMI was under-estimated from self reports (mean 0.2) was the 55-64 year old women. Prediction equations that explained 90% (men) and 88% (women) of the difference between self reported and measured height included age and self reported weight. The equivalent prediction equations for weight explained 93% of the difference between self reported and measured weight for men and included smoking and diabetic status, while for women 96% of the variance was explained with no further variables being significant. Sensitivity and specificity for determining clinical obesity (BMI⩾30) were 83% and 96% respectively for men, and 89% and 97% for women.
CONCLUSIONS—This Scottish population was unique in the under-reporting of height as well as weight, which resulted in BMI estimates with low error. These data suggest that self reported weights and heights would be satisfactory for the monitoring of obesity prevalence in Scotland.


Keywords: obesity measurement; obesity prevalence; self reports

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (141.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alvarez-Torices J. C., Franch-Nadal J., Alvarez-Guisasola F., Hernandez-Mejia R., Cueto-Espinar A. Self-reported height and weight and prevalence of obesity. Study in a Spanish population. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1993 Nov;17(11):663–667. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boström G., Diderichsen F. Socioeconomic differentials in misclassification of height, weight and body mass index based on questionnaire data. Int J Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;26(4):860–866. doi: 10.1093/ije/26.4.860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Crawley H. F., Portides G. Self-reported versus measured height, weight and body mass index amongst 16-17 year old British teenagers. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1995 Aug;19(8):579–584. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gupta M. A., Schork N. J., Dhaliwal J. S. Stature, drive for thinness and body dissatisfaction: a study of males and females from a non clinical sample. Can J Psychiatry. 1993 Feb;38(1):59–61. doi: 10.1177/070674379303800115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hill A., Roberts J. Body mass index: a comparison between self-reported and measured height and weight. J Public Health Med. 1998 Jun;20(2):206–210. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kuskowska-Wolk A., Karlsson P., Stolt M., Rössner S. The predictive validity of body mass index based on self-reported weight and height. Int J Obes. 1989;13(4):441–453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nichter M., Nichter M. Hype and weight. Med Anthropol. 1991 Sep;13(3):249–284. doi: 10.1080/01459740.1991.9966051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nieto-García F. J., Bush T. L., Keyl P. M. Body mass definitions of obesity: sensitivity and specificity using self-reported weight and height. Epidemiology. 1990 Mar;1(2):146–152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Roberts R. J. Can self-reported data accurately describe the prevalence of overweight? Public Health. 1995 Jul;109(4):275–284. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(95)80205-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Woodward M., Tunstall-Pedoe H., Smith W. C., Tavendale R. Smoking characteristics and inhalation biochemistry in the Scottish population. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(12):1405–1410. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90101-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ziebland S., Thorogood M., Fuller A., Muir J. Desire for the body normal: body image and discrepancies between self reported and measured height and weight in a British population. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Feb;50(1):105–106. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.1.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES