Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 2000 Mar;54(3):207–214. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.3.207

Income non-reporting: implications for health inequalities research

G Turrell 1
PMCID: PMC1731636  PMID: 10746115

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—To determine whether, in the context of a face to face interview, socioeconomic groups differ in their propensity to provide details about the amount of their personal income, and to discuss the likely consequences of any differences for studies that use income based measures of socioeconomic position.
DESIGN AND SETTING—The study used data from the 1995 Australian Health Survey. The sample was selected using a stratified multi-stage area design that covered urban and rural areas across all States and Territories and included non-institutionalised residents of private and non-private dwellings. The response rate was 91.5% for selected dwellings and 97.0% for persons within dwellings. Data were collected using face to face interviews. Income response, the dependent measure, was binary coded (0 if income was reported and 1 for refusals, "don't knows" and insufficient information). Socioeconomic position was measured using employment status, occupation, education and main income source. The socioeconomic characteristics of income non-reporters were initially examined using sex specific age adjusted proportions with 95% confidence intervals. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression.
PARTICIPANTS—Persons aged 15-64 (n=33 434) who were reportedly in receipt of an income from one or more sources during the data collection reference period.
RESULTS—The overall rate of income non-response was 9.8%. Propensity to not report income increased with age (15-29 years 5.8%, 30-49 10.6%, 50-64 13.8%). No gender differences were found (men 10.2%, women 9.3%). Income non-response was not strongly nor consistently related to education or occupation for men, although there was a suggested association among these variables for women, with highly educated women and those in professional occupations being less likely to report their income. Strong associations were evident between income non-response, labour force status and main income source. Rates were highest among the employed and those in receipt of an income from their own business or partnership, and lowest among the unemployed and those in receipt of a government pension or benefit (which excluded the unemployed).
CONCLUSION—Given that differences in income non-reporting were small to moderate across levels of the education and occupation variables, and that propensity to not report income was greater among higher socioeconomic groups, estimates of the relation between income and health are unlikely to be affected by socioeconomic variability in income non-response. Probability estimates from a logistic regression suggested that higher rates of income non-reporting among employed persons who received their income from a business or partnership were not attributable to socioeconomic factors. Rather, it is proposed that these higher rates were attributable to recall effects, or concerns about having one's income information disclosed to taxation authorities. Future studies need to replicate this analysis to determine whether the results can be inferred to other survey and data collection contexts. The analysis should also be extended to include an examination of the relation between socioeconomic position and accuracy of income reporting. Little is known about this issue, yet it represents a potential source of bias that may have important implications for studies that investigate the association between income and health.


Keywords: socioeconomic position; income non-response; data quality

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (171.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Backlund E., Sorlie P. D., Johnson N. J. The shape of the relationship between income and mortality in the United States. Evidence from the National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Ann Epidemiol. 1996 Jan;6(1):12–22. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(95)00090-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berkman L. F., Macintyre S. The measurement of social class in health studies: old measures and new formulations. IARC Sci Publ. 1997;(138):51–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brick J. M., Kalton G. Handling missing data in survey research. Stat Methods Med Res. 1996 Sep;5(3):215–238. doi: 10.1177/096228029600500302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davis P. B., Yee R. L., Chetwynd J., McMillan N. The New Zealand Partner Relations Survey: methodological results of a national telephone survey. AIDS. 1993 Nov;7(11):1509–1516. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199311000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dengler R., Roberts H., Rushton L. Lifestyle surveys--the complete answer? J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997 Feb;51(1):46–51. doi: 10.1136/jech.51.1.46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Etter J. F., Perneger T. V. Analysis of non-response bias in a mailed health survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Oct;50(10):1123–1128. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00166-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fein O. The influence of social class on health status: American and British research on health inequalities. J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Oct;10(10):577–586. doi: 10.1007/BF02640369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Feinstein J. S. The relationship between socioeconomic status and health: a review of the literature. Milbank Q. 1993;71(2):279–322. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. House J. S., Kessler R. C., Herzog A. R. Age, socioeconomic status, and health. Milbank Q. 1990;68(3):383–411. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaplan G. A., Lynch J. W. Whither studies on the socioeconomic foundations of population health? Am J Public Health. 1997 Sep;87(9):1409–1411. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.9.1409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Liberatos P., Link B. G., Kelsey J. L. The measurement of social class in epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev. 1988;10:87–121. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lynch J. W., Kaplan G. A., Salonen J. T. Why do poor people behave poorly? Variation in adult health behaviours and psychosocial characteristics by stages of the socioeconomic lifecourse. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(6):809–819. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00191-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lynch J., Kaplan G. A., Salonen R., Salonen J. T. Socioeconomic status and progression of carotid atherosclerosis. Prospective evidence from the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997 Mar;17(3):513–519. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.17.3.513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Martelin T. Mortality by indicators of socioeconomic status among the Finnish elderly. Soc Sci Med. 1994 May;38(9):1257–1278. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90190-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McDonough P., Duncan G. J., Williams D., House J. Income dynamics and adult mortality in the United States, 1972 through 1989. Am J Public Health. 1997 Sep;87(9):1476–1483. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.9.1476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Melton L. J., 3rd, Dyck P. J., Karnes J. L., O'Brien P. C., Service F. J. Non-response bias in studies of diabetic complications: the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Apr;46(4):341–348. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90148-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pappas G., Queen S., Hadden W., Fisher G. The increasing disparity in mortality between socioeconomic groups in the United States, 1960 and 1986. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jul 8;329(2):103–109. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199307083290207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Prendergast M. J., Beal J. F., Williams S. A. An investigation of non-response bias by comparison of dental health in 5-year-old children according to parental response to a questionnaire. Community Dent Health. 1993 Sep;10(3):225–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Saunders P. Poverty and health: exploring the links between financial stress and emotional stress in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1998 Feb;22(1):11–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1998.tb01139.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sheikh K., Mattingly S. Investigating non-response bias in mail surveys. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1981 Dec;35(4):293–296. doi: 10.1136/jech.35.4.293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Siemiatycki J. A comparison of mail, telephone, and home interview strategies for household health surveys. Am J Public Health. 1979 Mar;69(3):238–245. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.3.238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Slymen D. J., Drew J. A., Wright B. L., Elder J. P., Williams S. J. Item non-response to lifestyle assessment in an elderly cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 1994 Jun;23(3):583–591. doi: 10.1093/ije/23.3.583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Turrell G., Najman J. M. Collecting food-related data from low socioeconomic groups: how adequate are our current research designs? Aust J Public Health. 1995 Aug;19(4):410–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1995.tb00396.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vestbo J., Rasmussen F. V. Baseline characteristics are not sufficient indicators of non-response bias follow up studies. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992 Dec;46(6):617–619. doi: 10.1136/jech.46.6.617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES