Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE—This paper is based on a qualitative study that aimed to identify factors that facilitate or impede evidence-based policy making at a local level in the UK National Health Service (NHS). It considers how models of research utilisation drawn from the social sciences map onto empirical evidence from this study. DESIGN—A literature review and case studies of social research projects that were initiated by NHS health authority managers or GP fundholders in one region of the NHS. In depth interviews and document analysis were used. SETTING—One NHS region in England. PARTICIPANTS—Policy makers, GPs and researchers working on each of the social research projects selected as case studies. MAIN RESULTS—The direct influence of research evidence on decision making was tempered by factors such as financial constraints, shifting timescales and decision makers' own experiential knowledge. Research was more likely to impact on policy in indirect ways, including shaping policy debate and mediating dialogue between service providers and users. CONCLUSIONS—The study highlights the role of sustained dialogue between researchers and the users of research in improving the utilisation of research-based evidence in the policy process. Keywords: evidence-based policy making; research/policy interface; research utilisation
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (136.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Dowie J. 'Evidence-based', 'cost-effective' and 'preference-driven' medicine: decision analysis based medical decision making is the pre-requisite. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996 Apr;1(2):104–113. doi: 10.1177/135581969600100208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harries U., Elliott H., Higgins A. Evidence-based policy-making in the NHS: exploring the interface between research and the commissioning process. J Public Health Med. 1999 Mar;21(1):29–36. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/21.1.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacobson L. D., Edwards A. G., Granier S. K., Butler C. C. Evidence-based medicine and general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Jul;47(420):449–452. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murray S. A. Experiences with "rapid appraisal" in primary care: involving the public in assessing health needs, orientating staff, and educating medical students. BMJ. 1999 Feb 13;318(7181):440–444. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7181.440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Popay J., Rogers A., Williams G. Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res. 1998 May;8(3):341–351. doi: 10.1177/104973239800800305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sackett D. L., Rosenberg W. M., Gray J. A., Haynes R. B., Richardson W. S. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):71–72. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sheldon T. A., Sowden A. J., Lister-Sharp D. Search for evidence of effective health promotion. Systematic reviews include studies other than randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 1998 Feb 28;316(7132):704–704. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Speller V., Learmonth A., Harrison D. The search for evidence of effective health promotion. BMJ. 1997 Aug 9;315(7104):361–363. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7104.361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]